image stats
rating
2.61
votes
116
views
1893
uploader
aDCBeast
comments
14
date added
2006-01-21
category
None Yet
previous votes
Loading..
Bush = Weak on Terror !
1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
Bush = Weak on Terror !

"a man in a suit and hat"

Rate image:
[ | | ]
[ | ]
Comments for: Bush = Weak on Terror !
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: January 21, 2006 02:42PM

b.l.'s fucking dead already or his "latest" video would be verifiable to it's authenticity.
b.l. thinks he's some kind of movie star or something. his ego wouldn't accept any less than that.
al-jazeera and whoever else pulled this vid out of their asses.
shaDEz Report This Comment
Date: January 21, 2006 07:46PM

adcBeast
rated R for =Retarded=
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: January 21, 2006 09:06PM

Here's his translated full "message"


My message to you is about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and how to end them. I did not intend to speak to you about this because this issue has already been decided. Only metal breaks metal, and our situation, thank God, is only getting better and better, while your situation is the opposite of that.

But I plan to speak about the repeated errors your President Bush has committed in comments on the results of your polls that show an overwhelming majority of you want the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. But he has opposed this wish and said that withdrawing troops sends the wrong message to opponents, that it is better to fight them [Bin Laden's followers] on their land than their fighting us [Americans] on our land.

I can reply to these errors by saying that war in Iraq is raging with no letup, and operations in Afghanistan are escalating in our favor, thank God, and Pentagon figures show the number of your dead and wounded is increasing, not to mention the massive material losses, the destruction of the soldiers' morale there and the rise in cases of suicide among them.

So you can imagine the state of psychological breakdown that afflicts a soldier as he gathers the remains of his colleagues after they stepped on land mines that tore them apart. After this situation, the soldier is caught between two hard options. He either refuses to leave his military camp on patrols and is therefore dogged by ruthless punishments enacted by the Vietnam butcher [U.S. Army] or he gets destroyed by the mines. This puts him under psychological pressure, fear and humiliation while his nation is ignorant of that [what is going on].

The soldier has no solution except to commit suicide. That is a strong message to you, written by his soul, blood and pain, to save what can be saved from this hell. The solution is in your hands if you care about them [the soldiers]. The news of our brother mujahedin is different from what the Pentagon publishes. They [the news of mujahedin] and what the media report is the truth of what is happening on the ground. And what deepens the doubt over the White House's information is the fact that it targets the media reporting the truth from the ground. And it has appeared lately, supported by documents, that the butcher of freedom in the world [Bush] had decided to bomb the headquarters of the Al Jazeera in Qatar after bombing its offices in Kabul and Baghdad.

On another issue, jihad [holy war] is ongoing, thank God, despite all the oppressive measures adopted by the U.S. Army and its agents, to a point where there is no difference between this criminality and Saddam's criminality, as it has reached the degree of raping women and taking them as hostages instead of their husbands.

As for torturing men, they have used burning chemical acids and drills on their joints. And when they give up on [interrogating] them, they sometimes use the drills on their heads until they die. Read, if you will, the reports of the horrors in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo prisons.

And I say that, despite all the barbaric methods, they have not broken the fierceness of the resistance. The mujahedin, thank God, are increasing in number and strength — so much so that reports point to the ultimate failure and defeat of the unlucky quartet of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz. Declaring this defeat is just a matter of time, depending partly on how much the American people know of the size of this tragedy. The sensible people realize that Bush does not have a plan to make his alleged victory in Iraq come true.

And if you compare the small number of dead on the day that Bush announced the end of major operations in that fake, ridiculous show aboard the aircraft carrier with the tenfold number of dead and wounded who were killed in the smaller operations, you would know the truth of what I say. This is that Bush and his administration do not have the will or the ability to get out of Iraq for their own private, suspect reasons.

And so to return to the issue, I say that results of polls please those who are sensible, and Bush's opposition to them is a mistake. The reality shows that the war against America and its allies has not been limited to Iraq as he [Bush] claims. Iraq has become a point of attraction and restorer of [our] energies. At the same time, the mujahedin, with God's grace, have managed repeatedly to penetrate all security measures adopted by the unjust allied countries. The proof of that is the explosions you have seen in the capitals of the European nations that are in this aggressive coalition. The delay in similar operations happening in America has not been because of failure to break through your security measures. The operations are under preparation, and you will see them in your homes the minute they are through [with preparations], with God's permission.

Based on what has been said, this shows the errors of Bush's statement — the one that slipped from him — which is at the heart of polls calling for withdrawing the troops. It is better that we [Americans] don't fight Muslims on their lands and that they don't fight us on ours.

We don't mind offering you a long-term truce on fair conditions that we adhere to. We are a nation that God has forbidden to lie and cheat. So both sides can enjoy security and stability under this truce so we can build Iraq and Afghanistan, which have been destroyed in this war. There is no shame in this solution, which prevents the wasting of billions of dollars that have gone to those with influence and merchants of war in America who have supported Bush's election campaign with billions of dollars — which lets us understand the insistence by Bush and his gang to carry on with war.

If you are sincere in your desire for peace and security, we have answered you. And if Bush decides to carry on with his lies and oppression, then it would be useful for you to read the book "Rogue State," which states in its introduction: "If I were president, I would stop the attacks on the United States: First I would give an apology to all the widows and orphans and those who were tortured. Then I would announce that American interference in the nations of the world has ended once and for all."

Finally, I say that war will go either in our favor or yours. If it is the former, it means your loss and your shame forever, and it is headed in this course. If it is the latter, read history! We are people who do not stand for injustice, and we will seek revenge all our lives. The nights and days will not pass without us taking vengeance like on Sept. 11, God permitting. Your minds will be troubled and your lives embittered. As for us, we have nothing to lose. A swimmer in the ocean does not fear the rain. You have occupied our lands, offended our honor and dignity and let out our blood and stolen our money and destroyed our houses and played with our security, and we will give you the same treatment.

You have tried to prevent us from leading a dignified life, but you will not be able to prevent us from a dignified death. Failing to carry out jihad, which is called for in our religion, is a sin. The best death to us is under the shadows of swords. Don't let your strength and modern arms fool you. They win a few battles but lose the war. Patience and steadfastness are much better. We were patient in fighting the Soviet Union with simple weapons for 10 years, and we bled their economy, and now they are nothing.

In that there is a lesson for you.
Duane Report This Comment
Date: January 22, 2006 02:32AM

Lame,so gay,drivel.
The_Central_Scruitnizer Report This Comment
Date: January 22, 2006 04:08AM

Well, Bin Laden represents legitimate gripes with how we conduct ourselves around the world. That doesn't make HIM legitimate or his methods.

He's scum, but we're acting just like the fucking Soviet Union did back when the people who set Saddam Hussein up in power were calling the Soviet Union and "evil empire". Were they wrong?
Nope. (Though Reagan was wrong about a whole lot of other shit, some people, like him, must've slept through) It just makes us look like Dumbass Hypocrites. (Well, 52% of us, anyway....)
John_Stone Report This Comment
Date: January 22, 2006 06:57AM

Sort the signal from the noise, Duane. There are some clear issues being dealt with. The only question is whether he's honest about the truce or not. Based on Al Qaeda's methodologial approach, I'd guess there's some truth to the offer. But El Generalissimo Busho want control of the energy supplies in central asia, and won't pull out until he's cum all over the place.

As a wise man once said: " *What difference does it make to the dead, the injured, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of communism, or the holy name of democracy and liberty?* " Who, indeed, would Jesus bomb, yo. Nobody.
The_Central_Scrutinizer Report This Comment
Date: January 22, 2006 12:06PM

Nice, John. I second alla that.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: January 23, 2006 03:04AM

*he is dead you trees*!
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: January 23, 2006 04:05AM

2184 No one on this site reads that much shit, even if they agree with you completely. Brevity is the sole of wit.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: January 23, 2006 07:01AM

John_Stone, apparently you don't know much about Jesus. Yes he was for peace, but that turn the other cheek was a bit of a misunderstanding. He said, as is the custom, turn the other cheek. The custom was turn the other cheek, but only once, then kick the shit out of them. His point was don't strike back in anger the moment you get smacked, or even the second time. They don't get a third time. The thing about forgiving 70 times 7, that deals with forgivness. Kicking the crap out of nerdowells has nothing to do with forgiveness. You can forgive them after you take of business. NOBODY has the right to opress or enslave another human being. Yes, even your wife. So you can quit beating her now and go back to your bible pounding.
John_Stone Report This Comment
Date: January 27, 2006 04:46AM

Dude, I quit beating my wife years ago. Back off.

Humor aside, smiling
smiley , if we're going to discuss the "retaliatory Jesus", otherwise known as the "Battlin' Jesus" I heard the 'turn the other cheek' thing yet another way: Since Jesus was arabic and a Jew, and the culture says the left hand is unclear (due to wiping your butt with it), turning the other cheek was an insult to the overlords ... they would hit you with their right hand on your left cheek, so to insult them (since you can't really hit an overlord back, else suffer torture, etc.), you turn your other - right - cheek, asking them to strike you with their unclean =left= hand ... something they would not do. It was a passive-aggressive affront. But who knows. Wikipedia has a couple other versions, different from both of ours.

Regardless, I still think He would not have started an air war over Iraq that has now killed in excess of 100,000 people. If Saddam & Sons were to blame for despotic excess - and they certainly were - I think Jesus would have taken the fight to them, right? Dealt with them personally, and not persecuted the entire land with depleted uranium.

And while we're on esoteric theological points, you say =NOBODY has the right to oppress or enslave another human being= . So do you include the USA using "extraordinary rendition" to hide and torture people? How about Abu Ghraib, ok or no? Just curious.
sydney Report This Comment
Date: February 09, 2006 03:58AM

WAG THE DOG
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 26, 2006 08:00AM


Bin Laden .. chillin in Saudi Arabia thanks to Bush.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 26, 2006 11:34AM

Pres. George Bush in Extreme Makeover Greeting Dubai Overseers Of America's Owned America -Arabia O Akbar Harbors : Anchors Aweigh !