Onyma Report This Comment Date: March 14, 2012 07:38PM
I'd love to see the same chart for Bush's term... I think you'd find it even
worse.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: March 14, 2012 08:01PM
you're right, ................., Carter, Reagan and Bush all doubled down and
O'dipstick took the reins and spurred us on. i sure hope that you're not
claiming that because Bush snapped us all off in the ass that it's O.K. for
O'fuckhead to put one right between our eyes?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 14/03/2012 08:03PM by fossil_digger.
GAK67 Report This Comment Date: March 14, 2012 08:15PM
While that is a bad record you have to take into account that some of it would
have happened regardless of who was in the oval office and regardless of what
fiscal and economic policies are implemented. An example of that is the fuel
prices. There was also a Global Financial Crisis.
That doesn't fully absolve the politicians from their performances though.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: March 14, 2012 11:18PM
I'd like to hear an Obozo supporter try to rationalize anything he's done
without 1st attempting to reference his predecessor. If ever there was a
completely lame-o tactic to try and justify anything this jackass has done,
that's right at the top of the list, followed closely of course by the always
at-the-ready racism/race card ploy
BlahX3 Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 12:40AM
You wouldn't REALLY want that would you? I mean be honest, you'll just get
pissed off, your blood pressure will go up and stuff like that. Don't do that to
yourself, it's unhealthy and some of us here actually like you.
I don't support anyone. They're all full of shit as far as I'm concerned. I
don't like any of them. Everybody blames everybody else and that's not how
problems get solved.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 02:22AM
Want it? Goddamn man, I'd get off on it .... skeet, skeet, skeet
It would be ever so refreshing to find someone capable of representing Obozo in
a positive light without attempting to do so by way of comparing him to Bush
1st.
And .... I was never a huge fan of my fellow Texan but I'd take his
accomplishments 7 ways to Sundee over the assclown we have now.
Anyone with a brain who can look at the above indicators and see that as
positive movement by any stretch of the imagination on any of those fronts (and
a LOOOONG list of others) .... I'd say a lot more than their vision needed a
check up
BlahX3 Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 02:43AM
There are plenty of people out there representing a positive view on the
president. If you want to argue with someone and it really gets you off then
there are plenty to chose from. Whatever makes you feel better I guess. It all
looks like a futile pissing match to me.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 02:49AM
To us Type A++++sers it's a way of life and nearly as necessary as oxygen,
except that debate is what I desire, argument never achieves anything.
And, finding any lib capable of real debate is about as easy as findin frog hair
BlahX3 Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 03:18AM
It's just another pissing match and accomplishes nothing except people getting
piss on each other but mostly themselves. I can get drunk enough to do that all
by myself, thanks.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 04:59AM
So now Obama was expected to be Superman and stop the Bushwreck on the first
day he took office? LOL!
Only NUTTERS buy that argument
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 05:01AM
Obama turned the Bushwreck around with the stimulus
[
www.bloomberg.com]
Check out the 5yr chart .....
Jobs ... that Bush lost in droves ....
[
assets.bostatic.com]
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 05:34AM
Thanks for makin my points so eloquently Beast
canmer Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 01:30PM
At the end of the second world war, the US had half the world's wealth and
incomparable security and global reach. The government was well aware of the
massive power imbalance, and intended to keep it that way. This intention was
outlined in a major state paper of 1948 (PPS23). The author was the chair of the
State Department policy planning staff, respected statesman and scholar George
Kennan, a moderate dove. He noted that the central policy goal was to maintain
the "position of disparity" that separated our enormous wealth from
the poverty of others. To achieve that goal, he advised, "We should cease
to talk about vague and … unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising
of the living standards, and democratization," and must "deal in
straight power concepts", not "hampered by idealistic slogans"
about "altruism and world-benefaction."
By 1970, US share of world wealth had dropped to about 25%, roughly where it
remains, still colossal but far below the end of the second world war.
Only way is down guys, suck it up.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2012 02:31PM
so...what about my first link Beast? you must think it's a better plan than
Bush's plan of destruction?
oh i forgot...you might want to post links to less one sided stats. i won't
laugh as loud if you do.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 15/03/2012 02:33PM by fossil_digger.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: March 18, 2012 12:40AM
hellooooooo Beeeeeeeeeeeastie girl. cat got your fingers?
