There is so much data related to "climate change" that seems at best, tainted and agendized it's hard to accept their findings and clamorings as any different than the many other shrill campaigns flying around. Everything from sensor data placements in auspicious places, collected data being manipulated and the constant outcries from CC supporters about this or that impending catastrophe that never seem to ring true all points to an overall lack of believability for their case.
It would seem foolish to say man has no impact on our planet, as surely the actions of an ever growing population naturally has some sort of impact. Yet many climatologists are quick to point out that our planets weather is indeed cyclical and the impact we have made is almost negligible comparatively.
If you wanna glean where some real truth may lie in all this it's fairly simple to follow a common idea and "follow the money" to see who, if anyone stands to gain financially from forwarding CC theorems, selling carbon tax credits and peddling "green technology" items.
If you go about it from this standpoint I think you'll find there are many people, agencies, brokerage houses and manufacturers who certainly do stand to gain, and not only that, but gain quite substantially in foisting this agenda on others.
Could many, if not most of us, do a better job of conserving and recycling our resources? I would say the answer would most likely be yes to that query, to the benefit of all humanity, both living and those yet to be born.
For an interesting view on several of the above points as well as many others I'd highly recommend watching "Zeitgeist - Moving Forward" which uncovers many underlying principles on how we got to where we are today and reveals some common sense answers that would benefit everyone if they were embraced