image stats
date added
previous votes
log in


indent register
indent recover


1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars

Comments for: FAKE NEWS
Loner Report This Comment
Date: June 22, 2019 03:01PM

When was the photo taken? After the event in question? She looks happy to see him. Just sayin'.
pulse Report This Comment
Date: June 22, 2019 09:51PM

I think there's a fairly long bow being drawn there between meeting and knowing somebody.

I've met and greeted a thousand people in formal or business settings and have no idea who they are 5 seconds later.

Though I guess there was enough familiarity for the photographer to have known who it was immediately and realise they had indeed met.
quasi Report This Comment
Date: June 23, 2019 06:48AM

While simply meeting someone then forgetting them soon after happens to everyone and could apply in this case, genius Trump should realize this and say he may have met her but doesn't recall rather than categorically denying he ever met her. But denying everything then backtracking later is how he does things.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: June 23, 2019 07:09AM

Personally I don't care what he did or didn't do any more than I cared about Bill getting head in the Oval Office.
quasi Report This Comment
Date: June 23, 2019 12:09PM

So if he raped your mother, wife, daughter, whoever, you'd be good with that? What the hell is wrong with you?
Loner Report This Comment
Date: June 23, 2019 02:44PM

Quasi, so you are fully aware of what E. Jean Carroll is alleging(25 years ago), right? You actually know the story; what happened and the lead up to it, right?
Loner Report This Comment
Date: June 23, 2019 05:10PM

FYI - Apparently the photo was taken in 1987, whereas the alleged, and again I say alleged incident took place in 1994 or 1995.

E. Jean Carroll's narrative of the Trump encounter - DIRECTIONS: Scroll down about half-way down to the paragraph, "Which brings me to..." just above the pic of what appears to be an old TV appearance. Just below that, start at the paragraph that begins with, "And I say to No. 20...":

Camille Paglia, Seattle Times, Sunday February 17, 1991 <-That's right, 1991!
Perspective Needed -- Feminism's Lie: Denying Reality About Sexual Power And Rape
Camille Paglia:
"Running to mommy and daddy or the campus grievance committee is unworthy of strong women. Posting lists of guilty men in the toilet is cowardly, infantile stuff."
"A woman going to a fraternity party is walking into Testosterone Flats, full of prickly cacti and blazing guns. If she goes, she should be armed with resolute alertness. She should arrive with girlfriends and leave with them. A girl who lets herself get dead drunk at a fraternity party is a fool. A girl who goes upstairs alone with a brother at a fraternity party is an idiot. Feminists call this ``blaming the victim.'' I call it common sense."
"The only solution to date rape is female self-awareness and self-control. A woman's No. 1 line of defense against rape is herself. When a real rape occurs, she should report it to the police. Complaining to college committees because the courts ``take too long'' is ridiculous."

Jordan Peterson, excerpt from Strengthen the Individual: Q & A Parts I & II, "What Women Want"
The entire Q&A, which I, Loner, encourage listening to in its entirety(1 hour):
Jordan Peterson:
“But here’s the comical part. This just made me laugh, man. What were the five categories of most desirable male entity used most broadly in female pornography? It’s so embarrassing. Women you have to cover your heads while I say this:
“Vampire, werewolf, BILLIONAIRE, surgeon, and pirate.”

To have any opinion worth a damn you have to read Ms. Carroll's account of what happened. It doesn't take long if you know where to start.
You'll have to read the entire Paglia article(5 minutes?).
The Peterson excerpt is only 3 minutes or so.

What does Ms. Carroll say in the piece referenced above? "Do I attract hideous men? Possibly." She's also a writer. And it seems to me that she is inclined to seek or make good stories. I sure didn't want to read all of the blather in the piece, and I didn't. But a little below "hideous" I did read a bit about No. 15 and wonder, is she setting these guys up? Note No. 15's comment, "You're smart", and her response, "Thank you!", coupled with her earlier perception, 'gravel-voiced Moonves apparently takes one look at me — a 50-something journalist in a pair of old brown-and-beige oxfords — and his life is no longer his own.'

But, back to Trump. So, she's bantering back and forth with Billionaire about who's going to be trying on lingerie as they make their way back to a fitting room in an area of Bergdorf's with no other people ANYWHERE to be seen, and NO ALARM BELLS go off? BULLSHIT! Her following comment, "...and as I write this, I am staggered by my stupidity." Well, I'm staggered(not really) at her hubris. This woman knows exactly what she is doing!! Disagree? So, I guess you would argue that after all of the other experiences that she has had she can't put WHAT together? Nope! I ain't buyin' it! And sure, Trump has 200 lawyers. But Gloria Allred was already in full swing in the mid-90's. So that dog don't hunt. To argue that adequate options do not exist to mount an assault prosecution is a LIE! Certainly going forward reporting a crime years after it is committed should throw a shadow over the accusation, if not discrediting it altogether. This is the 21st century people. If a crime has been committed, step up now or shut up forever. Handle it!
Loner Report This Comment
Date: June 23, 2019 05:59PM

Speaking of 'knowing exactly what she's doing':

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23/06/2019 06:01PM by Loner.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: June 24, 2019 07:40AM

No, Quasi, if that happend to one of my family the perpetrator would be dead right after it happened.
Loner Report This Comment
Date: June 24, 2019 08:50AM

jgoins, What is the current sentencing in Missouri for doing the right thing?
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: June 24, 2019 12:35PM

innocent until proven guilty. smiling
quasi Report This Comment
Date: June 25, 2019 10:11AM

But it's okay if Trump were to do it to someone else's mother/wife/daughter because you don't care what he does or doesn't do, jgoins?
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: June 25, 2019 11:27AM

don't you think that if it DID happen, there would've been an immediate declaration of Mal-intent?
or should everyone wait until the perfect political instance to make a bigger impact? or possibly juuuuuuust before the statute of limitations expires?
maybe they should wait until the other party pushes you to say something?
maybe...she's full of shit and liked it, but he said or did something that you didn't like?
i'm sure i could think of some other "maybes", (but i need to go to work), or maybe we should STFU and quit judging people before they've had their day in court?

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 25/06/2019 11:28AM by fossil_digger.
pro_junior Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2019 12:19PM

one time about 23 years ago quasi tried to touch my butthole with his wiener. I don't remember where we were. I don't remember what day it was. I don't remember who else was there. I just remember he tried to do that. There's no proof. It's true because I say it's true.
Loner Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2019 12:26PM

Me too!
But it wasn't really rape. it was quasi-rape.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2019 03:44PM


i woulda said something earlier, but he offered me a ride in his canoe.....

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26/06/2019 03:47PM by fossil_digger.
quasi Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2019 04:26AM

Y'all need to learn to read for content.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2019 09:47AM

yeah, i missed the butt hole content (thank god), but i just went with the flow.