Mrkim Report This Comment
Date: September 15, 2009 10:33PM
Lots more fuel for the fire ..... Burn Baby
Tennessee Grand Jury Joins DOJ in Obstructing Justice
Canadian Free Press
By JB Williams Wednesday, September 9, 2009
The US Constitution and the entire American way of life hang in the balance. Yet
it is clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is engaged in running
interference for someone very likely to be an unconstitutional fraud, busily
dismantling our sovereign nation while his high-dollar Ivy League lawyers play
politics with the justice system.
For months now, numerous efforts to smoke Barack Hussein Obama out into the open
where he can become the “transparent” president he promised to be, have been
thwarted by Obama’s Department of Justice. The American people have been
categorically denied access to the courts or any other peaceful means of redress
and the clock is ticking on this time bomb.
Rather than confronting the facts presented in countless cases, the sum of which
raise more than a reasonable doubt regarding Obama’s Article II constitutional
eligibility for the Oval Office, the DOJ, in concert with Obama legal defense
attorneys who might be paid by the very taxpayers raising the claims, have used
technicality defenses to keep evidence against Obama out of court.
The net result is a massive nationwide federal DOJ effort to obstruct justice,
coming from within the halls of justice, if you can imagine.
Background for this developing story is available in, Is Obama Guilty of
Treason? - Jun 10, 2009 and Why Commander Fitzpatrick Is NOT Guilty of Mutiny! -
Jun 14, 2009.
Commander Fitzpatrick started his quest for justice in a letter dated November
6, 2008, in which he challenged the nations Electoral College to make public the
means by which they performed their constitutional duty to vet all candidates
for the office of President, including Barack Hussein Obama.
That letter stated, - “ELECTORS for President are the ultimate arbiters in
certifying a candidate’s eligibility to hold the Office of President. You are
invested with absolute authority and responsibility in determining eligibility.
The Constitution commands you vote only for Citizens who meet each
constitutional requirement to hold the Office of President. The Constitution
proscribes voting for a Person who is constitutionally ineligible.
MR. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S eligibility to hold the Office of President is an
unsettled question under direct and aggressive challenge.
I join, advance, and extend extant challenges by demanding ELECTORS for the
Office of President individually certify MR. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S
eligibility to hold the Office of President of the United States.”
As of this writing, there has been no response to Commander Fitzpatrick’s
letter. The entire letter can be read here: [jaghunters.blogspot.com
On March 17, 2009, LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick publicly and formally charged
President Barack Hussein Obama with the high crime of treason in a federal
complaint filed with James R. Dedrick U.S. Attorney, Eastern District Tennessee,
and Edgar Schmutzer, Dedrick’s Assistant U.S. Attorney. To date, no actions to
investigate the charges have been taken by this U.S. Attorney’s office.
However, on March 19, two days after the filing, Commander Fitzpatrick received
an unsolicited visit from two Secret Service agents at his home. They had been
advised by Dedrick’s office that the Commander presented some form of
“threat” to Mr. Obama.
When someone has something to hide, anyone seeking the truth is indeed a
“threat” to both the standing lie and the cover up. Having interviewed the
Commander on numerous occasions, I feel quite confident that he poses no other
type of “threat.”
Yet on the Tennessee Eastern District web site, the following mission statement
“The mission of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern
District of Tennessee is to enforce the law and defend the interests of the
United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats
foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and
controlling crime; and to ensure the fair and impartial administration of
justice for the people of East Tennessee.”
Why no action on criminal charges of “treason” then? Why won’t Commander
Fitzpatrick get his day in court, or a “fair and impartial administration of
justice” under Obama’s DOJ?
Since then, Commander Fitzpatrick has remained engaged in his quest for justice
and last week he was finally successful in placing the criminal case against
Obama before a Tennessee Grand Jury in Monroe County, but not without
incident… Back to this in a moment.
DNC Documents that could Hang Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama
Not one, but TWO DNC nomination documents were signed, notarized and delivered
to the DNC on the same day, August 28, 2008. The purpose of these documents was
the official party nomination of Barack Hussein Obama and Joe Biden as the DNC
national ticket for president and vice president of the United States.
Normally, one will do. In this case, the TWO nominating documents are identical
except for one very important sentence, which is missing from the second version
of the document.
Present in document #1, but missing from document #2 is this sentence, -
“and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the
United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United
Document #1 includes this language, but document #2 does not. Both appear
identical, with this exception. Both appear to be dated and signed by DNC Chair
Nancy Pelosi and DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond. Both appear to be notarized
by the same notary of public on the same date.
But which of the TWO documents was delivered as the official nomination
document? Or, why TWO different documents?
Why was the phrase concerning constitutional provisions deleted from the second
version of the document?
And what evidence was used to fully vet Barack Hussein Obama for the Office of
Three COLBs vs. One Birth Certificate
The official record stands. NO official authenticated birth certificate for
Barack Hussein Obama has been offered by team Obama as proof that Obama is a US
citizen, much less a “natural born citizen” eligible to be President of the
United States under Article II—Section I of the US Constitution.
Contrary to leftist propaganda from the press, members of congress, the DOJ and
some courts, the burden of proof belongs to Obama, as Article II—Section I is
a well-known long-standing job requirement for the office of President, applied
equally to all applicants or candidates for more than 200 years.
Just as a job applicant is required to prove his/her drug-free status by
submitting to a drug test upon the request of the employer who established
drug-free status as a standard requirement for employment, Obama or any other
candidate for the office of President must be willing to prove compliance with
the standard job requirements that have existed in the Constitution since
Further in this regard, the US Senate took specific action in a Senate
Resolution to address the question of whether or not Senator John McCain was a
constitutional “natural born citizen” eligible to run for president in 2008.
But no such effort to vet or affirm eligibility for Barack Hussein Obama has
ever been undertaken by the Senate, the House, the courts, the Electoral College
or the press.
Instead, THREE different Hawaiian COLBs (Certifications of Live Birth, available
to anyone including people born abroad to foreign parents) have been posted
online as proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, none of them authenticated.
Clearly, as THREE difference COLBs have been offered, at least TWO of the THREE,
if not all three, are forgeries. But nobody knows since none of the three have
ever been authenticated.
Even if one were able to be authenticated, it would still not rise to the level
of “proof of citizenship” much less “natural born citizenship” as
defined by the Founders and reaffirmed by the Senate just last year.
Nearly $1.5 Million in legal fees to avoid the question
Although Obama has managed to focus all attention upon the missing birth
certificate, without which he could not even obtain a drivers license, open a
bank account or become a Scoutmaster in most states, the real issue is not when
or where he was born, but to whom… As the son of a foreign national, he cannot
be a “natural born citizen” of the United States.
Obama has spent almost $1.5 million racing lawyers around the country. In every
instance, those lawyers have raised “technicality” defenses without even
once challenging the claims or evidence against their client. In short, they
have thus far succeeded in stopping any discovery from going forward, in which
Obama’s files could be subpoenaed during the discovery process.
ALL birth, college, travel, passport and selective service files remain under
lock and key as of today. NOBODY knows for certain who or what Barack Hussein
Obama is as of this writing, despite a number of well-regurgitated false claims
by leftist organizations like FactCheck, MoveOn and Snopes.
All attention is on the missing birth certificate, three forged COLBs and now, a
birth certificate from Kenya and a sworn affidavit regarding the authenticity of
the Kenyan certificate, as the DOJ remains committed to blocking any discovery
under oath on the matter. Why?
The Kenyan Cert and Sworn Affidavit
Russian immigrant and self-made internet lawyer Orly Taitz amended an existing
suit to include a certified copy of a Kenyan birth certificate for Barack
Hussein Obama II, from Coastal Province Hospital in Mombassa, Kenya, dated
August 4, 1961, along with a sworn affidavit of authenticity under penalty of
This document is consistent with prior sworn affidavits from Obama family
members who have repeatedly claimed over the months of ongoing debate, to have
been present at Obama’s Kenyan birth.
A hearing on this case is scheduled for today, September 8, 2009, before Judge
David Carter, who has promised that all evidence would be heard in his court in
More on this later…
Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury August 27, 2009
Meanwhile, Commander Fitzpatrick had to literally fight his way into a Monroe
County Tennessee Grand Jury meeting last week, in his effort to file criminal
charges of “treason” and “fraud” against Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry
In his brief, Commander Fitzpatrick covers a lot of ground. But the tip of his
spear reads as follows…
“OBAMA-SOETORO IS MY SWORN ENEMY! - And as there were TRAITORS to Italy in
Caesars day, I report to this GRAND JURY with force and authority there are
senior military officers no more obedient to the CONSTITUTION than their
criminal DICTATOR, OBAMA-SOETORO.”
I must state that in this era of relative morality, I respect the Commander’s
ability and willingness to state his charges in such unequivocal terms. There
can be no missing the Commander’s point here, and his position is based firmly
in the oath he has taken along with millions of other soldiers, to protect and
defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
I can only pray that ALL American soldiers take that oath as seriously as
Commander Fitzpatrick, and I suspect that most do.
In his efforts to deliver his briefs to the Tennessee Grand Jury, his search for
justice was constantly obstructed by local officers of the court. Commander
Fitzpatrick alleges that both District Attorney James H. Stutts and Grand Jury
Foreman Gary Pettway stopped just short of physical abuse in their endless
efforts to obstruct the Commander’s access to the court.
In fact, on September 4, 2009, Commander Fitzpatrick filed formal criminal
charges of obstruction against Grand Jury Foreman Pettway and District Attorney
James H. Stutts for their continuing efforts to obstruct justice in the Monroe
County Grand Jury system, stating in his complaint—“My appearance before the
Grand Jury panel yesterday was a puppet show. Criminally assisted by others
named below, Mr. Pettway first attempted to block my appearance, and then
materially interfered with my verbal testimony and blocked all efforts to enter
into the record the physical evidence in my possession yesterday.”
As of this writing, no case number has been issued by Madisonville Police
Department concerning Fitzpatrick’s criminal complaint against Stutts or
Pettway, and it is unknown what if any action, the Monroe County Grand Jury
might take on the matter.
Meanwhile, on that same day, Obama’s DOJ was busy filing yet another dismissal
demand in Santa Ana, CA—using the same old “technicality” defense to stop
Orly Taitz in her current case in an ongoing DOJ effort to keep discovery of
Obama’s history out of Judge David Carter’s court this time.
Once again, the DOJ’s defense argument is limited to technicalities, not the
merits of allegations or the growing mountain of evidence against their
From the DOJ dismissal request—
III. ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1. This
Court Lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction Of This Action . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
A. Plaintiffs Lack Standing Herein . . . . . . . . 4 1. No Plaintiff Can
Show The Required Concrete, Traceable Injury-in-Fact To Provide Standing
Herein . . . . . . . 5 2. Plaintiffs Cannot Satisfy The Redressability
Requirement For Standing . . 9 B. This Case Presents Non-Justiciable Political
Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 C. This Court Lacks Subject
Matter Jurisdiction Over Plaintiffs’ Quo Warranto Claims . . . . . 16 D.
This Court Does Not Have Subject Matter Jurisdiction Of This Action Under Either
42 U.S.C. ¬ß 1983, Or 42 U.S.C. ¬ß 1988 . . . . 18
No direct denial of any of the claims leveled against their client, but just a
continued argument that NO American citizen has “proper standing” to
question King Barack Hussein Obama and all of his Czars. It should be obvious to
all readers at this point, that our system of justice is being manipulated by
Ivy League lawyers to subvert the system and obstruct justice. Every case filed
so far has been met with a technical defense asserting a “lack of standing”
to bring the charges, no matter who brings the charges, how much evidence they
have to support their charges, or in what court they bring those charges….
According to Obama’s defense team, “This motion (to dismiss) is made on the
ground that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’
claims against Defendants, and on the further ground that, as to certain claims
and Defendants, Plaintiffs fail to state claims upon which this Court may grant
relief. Further, with respect to any and all claims or causes of action alleged
herein under the Freedom of Information Act, this Court should also dismiss said
claims pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), on the
additional ground that venue does not properly lie as to said claims in this
The demand for dismissal was signed by attorneys for Obama, I assume paid for by
American taxpayers, since all serve under Obama’s Department of Justice as
U.S. Attorneys… GEORGE S. CARDONA Acting United States Attorney LEON W.
WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division ROGER E. WEST
Assistant United States Attorney First Assistant Chief, Civil Division DAVID A.
DeJUTEAssistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants Further, the
very people we expect to uphold and defend the US Constitution against a
“domestic enemy within” are also charged with defending that “domestic
enemy within” via the Department of Justice, all at taxpayer expense.
Judge Carter Orders Eligibility Case to Trial
As this column comes back from editing, news arrives that Judge Carter did NOT
dismiss the eligibility case before his court today.
From the WND report—“In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter,
several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions
about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants,
which she had.
In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States
Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent plaintiffs Wiley Drake
and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the
vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson,
the party’s chairman, also were restored to the case.
But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz’ motion to be granted
discovery—that is the right to see the president’s still-concealed records.
Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by
the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz’ challenge to the work of
a magistrate in the case.
Carter ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on the motion to dismiss and ordered arguments
submitted on the issue of discovery. - If the case survives that challenge, a
pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks
If Justice is denied in Santa Ana
The term “Once a Marine, always a Marine” seems to hold true in Santa Ana
California today. However, as WND reports, the DOJ request to dismiss will be
heard in October. If Carter has the backbone to deny the DOJ their desperate
plea to keep all Obama facts secret, then Obama’s fraudulent political future
could be limited to late January 2010.
However, the DOJ carries GREAT weight and powers of persuasion. They will stop
at nothing to stop this case from going forward. Based on the body count of past
Obama and Clinton opponents, I’d recommend that Judge Carter hire a crack
security staff immediately.
Indictment law under Rules of Criminal Procedure adopted in 1946 (but not passed
into law or amending the Constitution) are being used to block access to the
courts concerning Obama’s eligibility.
If for some reason the people are denied access to the courts once more in Judge
Carter’s court, I return to the same conclusion I have arrived at on countless
occasions over the last few years.
The Last Peaceful Solution
If the entire federal government, including the department assigned the duty of
administering equal justice under the Constitution and the law, has been
perverted into some insane mechanism by which the system itself is used as a
tool to obstruct justice and further subvert our system of self-governance, the
options for American citizens are limited at best.
In this event, the American Grand Jury effort is the last remaining peaceful
alternative for redress, in which the non-binding rules of criminal procedure
are set aside and the US Constitution is enforced via a constitutional grand
jury process, which has already returned 16 Grand Jury indictments against
Barack Hussein Obama.
This thing will not end until Barack Hussein Obama and all co-conspirators have
been brought to justice. The Constitution, freedom and liberty MUST be defended
at any cost. But all peaceful means must be exhausted before last resort
measures become the only alternative to protect the republic.
If the people are afforded NO access to the courts, to congress, to the press,
or any other peaceful means of redress, the people are left to their own devices
in defense of the free constitutional republic. The people are on their own at
that point and it will be every man for himself, patriots against invaders and
Left-wing elitists have already determined that not a single American citizen
has the “proper standing” and that NO US court has “proper jurisdiction”
to demand a constitutional government. But Americans must resist the urge for
violent revolution until all peaceful remedies have been exhausted. At that
point and for this reason alone, our Founding fathers wrote the following
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure
these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish
it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles
and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to
effect their Safety and Happiness.”—Declaration of Independence
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 15/09/2009 10:34PM by Mrkim.