Mrkim Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2008 12:19PM
As glaring examples of a New World Order concept the Roman conquests and the
British attempts at world colonization and domination certainly rank as valid
attempts in the past.
What would the current move towards such a concept mean to the average American
you ask jgoins?
It would mean more "open borders" between ourselves and Mexico and
Canada, basically dissolving American sovereignty (want more Mescans here?),
reducing or deleting trade/import tarrifs and trucking restrictions currently in
place in the US to the great detriment of the American trucking indutry, which
is already staggering and shaky from the current price of fuel.
These moves all serve to further reduce the security of the current American
middle class job market and of course their buying power in doing so,
effectively turning the whole of American middle class society into a more :less
than" position than the one enjoyed today, which in case you haven't
noticed is slipping and has been for years now as costs of goods sold has far
outpaced most peoples income increases in the same time span.
So I guess if more foreign nationals enjoying rights to what we Americans feel
entitled to as born citizens of our nation, a continuing errosion of the middle
classes position here and in turn, more people here slipping into the ranks of
social poverty as a result, and political entities in Canada and Mexico having
an increased impact on the way our laws and society functions here is acceptable
to you, there really isn't a problem in how this trend might effect your day to
day life jgoins.
If you'd like more info a simple google video search of New World Order or the
NAU will certainly reveal quite a plethora of details on this topic and the
effects it could have on life in the United States.
Time to wake up and smell the catfood before it's too late
Mrkim Report This Comment
Date: June 28, 2008 01:03PM
The Federal Reserve Bank is and always has been a private corporation driven to
make as much $$ as possible and the US population is one of its main profit
centers. It is now and always has had a stranglehold on our economic system and
even worse than all that, a stranglehold given to them by our own congress!
You cats can talk all the shit you want about Ron Paul and what a wack job you
might envision his ideologies to be but the simple truth is he was the ONLY
presidential candidate calling for an end to the Federal Reserve Bank to stop
its pandering of our economy, the ONLY candidate wanting to make our government
fiscally responsible and give back the states rights that the Fed now dangles
over their heads by witholding federal funding when they refuse to play ball,
put an end to the rampant illegal immigration and many, withdraw our forces from
the lose-lose situation we are embroiled in in Iraq, and many more things all
core to the survival of our country.
Yep, I know the old argument about the limits of presidential powers and how no
president could really just go about doing these types of things without
congresses approval. However, if one is not sworn to make such changes, has not
made them pivotal to their campaign, what are the odds that they will EVER
undertake any such changes at all? In case that answer is evading you it's
called SLIM TO NONE
The other side of the coin is that IF Ron Paul were elected to the office, or
for that matter ANY candidate they COULD lobby the American Public to implore
their elected officials to move on legislation intended to make such changes
Now then, for the real meaty questions ..... has Obama or McCain either one even
mentioned the idea of disempowering the Federal Reserve Bank? Do either of these
candidates make mention of STOPPING the NAU initiatives underway? Do either of
these guys stump their constituents to support minimalization of the behemoth we
know as the Federal Government and return the rights to the states the
Constitution guaranteed that have been continually usurped by the Fed instead
If ANY single supporter of the above mentioned front runner candidates can prove
that a SINGLE answer to the above listed questions is a FIRM yes, I sure would
like to hear validation of that because I have heard NOTHING even vaguely
similar to such ideologies from either of the.
What can we do about all this? The answer is short, sweet and simple : research
every poitical candidate up for election in the coming elections and use the one
weapon you have and VOTE with your head! Do not vote because the candidate
shares your skin color, or because they make vague promises resembling the old
"2 Chickens In Every Pot" BS, vote for them because they share your
concerns about our nations issues and people and want to do something about them
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 28, 2008 03:24PM
Check this out, I'm telling you..... you live in a corporation.... why do you
think we do business the way we do with the Federal Reserve? That's just it, it
is just business
between two corporations, there is no government
By the way... the Supreme Court 5-4 for
guns is scary, should have been
9-0, it just goes to show how bad things really are, at least some of the
Supreme Court just goes with whatever is contemporary at the moment... SICK!
1st: Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with
General Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President
Lincoln institute continuous martial law by ordering the states (people) either
conscribe troops and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized
as enemies of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect
today. This martial law authority gives the President (with or without
Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by
government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America.
This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation
of Presidential Executive Orders authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The
Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters
105, 106, October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act,
which is ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress.
Today these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as their
2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a “municipal
corporation” to govern the District of Columbia. Considering the fact that
the municipal government itself was incorporated in 1808, an “Organic Act”
(first Act) using the term “municipal corporation” in 1871 can only mean a
private corporation owned by the municipality. Hereinafter we will call that
private corporation, “Corp. U.S.” By consistent usage, Corp. U.S.
trademarked the name, “United States Government” referring to
The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 places Congress in
control (like a corporate board) and gives the purpose of the act to form a
governing body over the municipality; this allowed Congress to direct the
business needs of the government under the existent martial law and provided
them with corporate abilities they would not otherwise have. This was done
under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten
mile square of the District of Columbia. Follow this link to see the effect of
the District of Columbia Act of 1871.
3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States
Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of
the United States of America) except that it was missing the national
constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution's 14th, 15th and
16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the
Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this point take special notice and remember this
Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the
same manner in 1913.
4th: Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in
1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the
bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the
debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of the assets of
the Treasury of the United States of America.
5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary
business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they
could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already
demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had
foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a
private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve Bank". Corp. U.S.
formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact
their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship
was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government;
that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank
system—again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that
set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is
found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and
the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.
6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S.
adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters challenge the
IRS tax collection system based on this fact, however when we remember that
Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and
adopting it; there is no difference between that adoption and this—such is the
nature of corporate enactments—when the corporate board (Congress) tells the
secretary to enter the amendment as ratified (even thought the States had not
ratified it) the Se3cretary was instructed that the Representatives word alone
was sufficient for ratification. You must also note, this amendment has nothing
to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which
already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court (in BRUSHABER v. UNION
PACIFIC R. CO., 240 U.S. 1 (1916)) ruled the 16th amendment did nothing that was
not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United
States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations and government employees. We agree,
considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.
7th: Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified)
its 17th amendment. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not
constitutional; the nation's Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing
the matter of where Senators are elected, which is the subject matter of this
amendment; therefore they cannot pass such and Act and then of their own
volition, order it entered as ratified. According to the United States Supreme
Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to pass
an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.
8th: Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that
successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp.
U.S. Senate capacity only; their respective seats from their States remained
vacant because neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new
Senators to replace them as is still required by the national Constitution for
placement of a national Senator.
9th: In 1916, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their
election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where
the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral
College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly have been used
for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was
not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States
of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity.
Therefore the original jurisdiction government's seats were vacated because the
people didn't seat any original jurisdiction government officers. It is
important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander
in Chief of the military. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that such
a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams was
President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of
the military in preparation for an impending war with France. During this
period, Mr. Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill
and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr.
Hamilton and Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton
would use that authority to create a military dictatorship of the nation. Mr.
Adams averted the war through diplomacy and the title of Commander in Chief was
returned to him.
(See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over
this matter quite well. Mr. Adams was a fascinating man.)
10th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the
11th: In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt, they force a banking holiday to
exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes with “legal tender” Federal
Reserve Notes the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the
people of the United States as enemies of Corp. U.S.
12th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a
relationship with their program. With the express purpose of generating
Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security
Administration creates an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is
spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social Security
number). They give you the Social Security card and let you know that the card
does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until they want it back.
If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you activate the
card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the
cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card’s name and number to
thus transact business relations for the card’s actual owner. You are also to
note that though the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with
authority to control the entity so created) it is not for use as identification.
On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the
entity, they offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee capacity (by
lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave you something
(the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved the
actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity—by
definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust. More
importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they
gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual consciousness and
physical capacity to this Trust’s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your
capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way—what
you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you.
13th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed
to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private
corporation.14th: In 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington,
Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors
were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes
(foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions,
alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people
would discover what had been done with their money and would likely to kill them
all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S.
and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created,
which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, which thing
the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do. Our
Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they
govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern
themselves. Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.
15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such
private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the
people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State
Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but
rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us and share
your discovery with us.
When you find there is no error in this historical outline, then remember these
simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.
The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations
remember that is what they are and stop calling them government.
Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fix them. It is far
more important that we learn how to reseat our original jurisdiction government
and spread the word about the truth. By reseating our State and national
governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold
these private foreign corporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in
fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world. In fact it is
impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back
our nation and put things right. The process is a simple one. The difficulty
is in getting our people to wake up to the truth. That's why we ask you to
prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery.
That means that you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything
other than the sovereign that God created you to be. And, stop referring to
Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign
corporations that they are. And, finally, stop listening to the Bigfoot Patriot
Mythology that is espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.
It's time to wake up and follow the truth, time to repent and become a moral and
honorable society instead of lauding our Piety while we stand guilty of:
a) not knowing the truth;
b) not living the truth;
c) believing God will save us even though we have the tools to know the truth
the ability to use the tools but we refuse to live by the truth and use the
tools we have to save ourselves and thereby become free.
The biggest problem with that get all excited about uniting against the tyranny
of Corp. U.S. is that they are blind to the truth having no remedy so they bail
out of "the system" hell bent for a rebellion even the scripture says
cannot be won with conventional weapons of war. Would that we could instead
follow the admonition of the King of Kings and unite with truth to legally,
lawfully and peacefully reseat our original jurisdiction government thereby
taking back the control our nation in accord with law.