image stats
rating
3.08
votes
169
views
3178
uploader
Anonymous
comments
19
date added
2008-06-26
category
Sport
previous votes
Loading..
also liked
New World Order... Right in your Faces......
1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
New World Order... Right in your Faces......

"a statue of a man in front of a building"

Rate image:
[ | | ]
[ | ]
Comments for: New World Order... Right in your Faces......
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2008 07:36PM

Ring of Power......
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2008 07:52PM

Yeah! the New World Order revolves around Uranus....drinking smiley
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2008 08:10PM

and 9 rings were given to men, who above all else desired power.....
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2008 08:15PM

A great jam............... turn it up!

[www.youtube.com]
Mrkim Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2008 09:28PM

Anyone blind to the concept of a New World Order being currently afoot should make a valiant attempt at getting their head out of their anus.

"It's a cold, cruel world out there folks .... and we'll all be going out there again tomorrow" winking
smiley

smoking
smiley
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 26, 2008 10:39PM

Sorry MrKim, just couldn't resist making a joke, the NWO conspiracy stuff is nothing new, if you read Cicero from the Roman Republic 2 milenia ago they had it, and it's all over in history and I believe it's been the same since the start of human time. 'The strong will conquer the weak' drinking smiley
blinkermann Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2008 03:18AM

So the new world order is western civilization. Damn that Cicero, if only he had stopped it.
pro_junior Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2008 05:15AM

new world order
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2008 11:41AM

Just what impact would a new world order have on me or any ordinary person.
Mrkim Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2008 04:19PM

As glaring examples of a New World Order concept the Roman conquests and the British attempts at world colonization and domination certainly rank as valid attempts in the past.

What would the current move towards such a concept mean to the average American you ask jgoins?

It would mean more "open borders" between ourselves and Mexico and Canada, basically dissolving American sovereignty (want more Mescans here?), reducing or deleting trade/import tarrifs and trucking restrictions currently in place in the US to the great detriment of the American trucking indutry, which is already staggering and shaky from the current price of fuel.

These moves all serve to further reduce the security of the current American middle class job market and of course their buying power in doing so, effectively turning the whole of American middle class society into a more :less than" position than the one enjoyed today, which in case you haven't noticed is slipping and has been for years now as costs of goods sold has far outpaced most peoples income increases in the same time span.

So I guess if more foreign nationals enjoying rights to what we Americans feel entitled to as born citizens of our nation, a continuing errosion of the middle classes position here and in turn, more people here slipping into the ranks of social poverty as a result, and political entities in Canada and Mexico having an increased impact on the way our laws and society functions here is acceptable to you, there really isn't a problem in how this trend might effect your day to day life jgoins.

If you'd like more info a simple google video search of New World Order or the NAU will certainly reveal quite a plethora of details on this topic and the effects it could have on life in the United States.

Time to wake up and smell the catfood before it's too late eye
popping smiley

smoking
smiley
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2008 10:18PM

Here's a site to dig on, some dead links, an attorneys site. One thing that everyone seems to agree on as far as good and bad, right or wrong is, The Federal Reserve is a Private Corporation that enslaves us, it is that simple, whoever has the money makes the rules.... and they don't just have the money they create it!

[home.hiwaay.net]
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2008 10:22PM

If there are any beginners out there just watch this, just a sample of the control.

[www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 27, 2008 11:49PM

Hmmmmm.....

[news.yahoo.com]

[www.youtube.com]

[www.youtube.com]

The white boy with no money gets arrested and didn't get nowhere even close to the millions and millions of people that heard the other two.... Police State!


Fuck 'er!!!!
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: June 28, 2008 11:28AM

What power do we realisticly have to do anything about it? Also, I have been in the middle class in over 25 years as I am below the national poverty level.
Mrkim Report This Comment
Date: June 28, 2008 05:03PM

The Federal Reserve Bank is and always has been a private corporation driven to make as much $$ as possible and the US population is one of its main profit centers. It is now and always has had a stranglehold on our economic system and even worse than all that, a stranglehold given to them by our own congress!

You cats can talk all the shit you want about Ron Paul and what a wack job you might envision his ideologies to be but the simple truth is he was the ONLY presidential candidate calling for an end to the Federal Reserve Bank to stop its pandering of our economy, the ONLY candidate wanting to make our government fiscally responsible and give back the states rights that the Fed now dangles over their heads by witholding federal funding when they refuse to play ball, put an end to the rampant illegal immigration and many, withdraw our forces from the lose-lose situation we are embroiled in in Iraq, and many more things all core to the survival of our country.

Yep, I know the old argument about the limits of presidential powers and how no president could really just go about doing these types of things without congresses approval. However, if one is not sworn to make such changes, has not made them pivotal to their campaign, what are the odds that they will EVER undertake any such changes at all? In case that answer is evading you it's called SLIM TO NONE !

The other side of the coin is that IF Ron Paul were elected to the office, or for that matter ANY candidate they COULD lobby the American Public to implore their elected officials to move on legislation intended to make such changes possible.

Now then, for the real meaty questions ..... has Obama or McCain either one even mentioned the idea of disempowering the Federal Reserve Bank? Do either of these candidates make mention of STOPPING the NAU initiatives underway? Do either of these guys stump their constituents to support minimalization of the behemoth we know as the Federal Government and return the rights to the states the Constitution guaranteed that have been continually usurped by the Fed instead ?

If ANY single supporter of the above mentioned front runner candidates can prove that a SINGLE answer to the above listed questions is a FIRM yes, I sure would like to hear validation of that because I have heard NOTHING even vaguely similar to such ideologies from either of the.

What can we do about all this? The answer is short, sweet and simple : research every poitical candidate up for election in the coming elections and use the one weapon you have and VOTE with your head! Do not vote because the candidate shares your skin color, or because they make vague promises resembling the old "2 Chickens In Every Pot" BS, vote for them because they share your concerns about our nations issues and people and want to do something about them smileys with beer

smoking
smiley
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 28, 2008 07:24PM

Check this out, I'm telling you..... you live in a corporation.... why do you think we do business the way we do with the Federal Reserve? That's just it, it is just business between two corporations, there is no government involvement.

By the way... the Supreme Court 5-4 for guns is scary, should have been 9-0, it just goes to show how bad things really are, at least some of the Supreme Court just goes with whatever is contemporary at the moment... SICK!

------------------------------------------------------

Historical Outline

1st: Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with General Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute continuous martial law by ordering the states (people) either conscribe troops and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today. This martial law authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress. Today these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.

2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a “municipal corporation” to govern the District of Columbia. Considering the fact that the municipal government itself was incorporated in 1808, an “Organic Act” (first Act) using the term “municipal corporation” in 1871 can only mean a private corporation owned by the municipality. Hereinafter we will call that private corporation, “Corp. U.S.” By consistent usage, Corp. U.S. trademarked the name, “United States Government” referring to themselves. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 places Congress in control (like a corporate board) and gives the purpose of the act to form a governing body over the municipality; this allowed Congress to direct the business needs of the government under the existent martial law and provided them with corporate abilities they would not otherwise have. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District of Columbia. Follow this link to see the effect of the District of Columbia Act of 1871.

3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution's 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in 1913.

4th: Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve Bank". Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system—again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collection system based on this fact, however when we remember that Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it; there is no difference between that adoption and this—such is the nature of corporate enactments—when the corporate board (Congress) tells the secretary to enter the amendment as ratified (even thought the States had not ratified it) the Se3cretary was instructed that the Representatives word alone was sufficient for ratification. You must also note, this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court (in BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO., 240 U.S. 1 (1916)) ruled the 16th amendment did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations and government employees. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.

7th: Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th amendment. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation's Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected, which is the subject matter of this amendment; therefore they cannot pass such and Act and then of their own volition, order it entered as ratified. According to the United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.

8th: Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate capacity only; their respective seats from their States remained vacant because neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new Senators to replace them as is still required by the national Constitution for placement of a national Senator.

9th: In 1916, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government's seats were vacated because the people didn't seat any original jurisdiction government officers. It is important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of the military. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that such a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military in preparation for an impending war with France. During this period, Mr. Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would use that authority to create a military dictatorship of the nation. Mr. Adams averted the war through diplomacy and the title of Commander in Chief was returned to him.
(See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite well. Mr. Adams was a fascinating man.)

10th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act.

11th: In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt, they force a banking holiday to exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes with “legal tender” Federal Reserve Notes the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States as enemies of Corp. U.S.

12th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program. With the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration creates an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social Security number). They give you the Social Security card and let you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until they want it back. If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you activate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card’s name and number to thus transact business relations for the card’s actual owner. You are also to note that though the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority to control the entity so created) it is not for use as identification. On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, they offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave you something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity—by definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust. More importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual consciousness and physical capacity to this Trust’s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way—what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you.

13th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.14th: In 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely to kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do. Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern themselves. Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.

15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.

Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us and share your discovery with us.

When you find there is no error in this historical outline, then remember these simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.

The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations remember that is what they are and stop calling them government.

Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fix them. It is far more important that we learn how to reseat our original jurisdiction government and spread the word about the truth. By reseating our State and national governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign corporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world. In fact it is impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right. The process is a simple one. The difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth. That's why we ask you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery.

That means that you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than the sovereign that God created you to be. And, stop referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are. And, finally, stop listening to the Bigfoot Patriot Mythology that is espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.

It's time to wake up and follow the truth, time to repent and become a moral and honorable society instead of lauding our Piety while we stand guilty of:
a) not knowing the truth;
b) not living the truth;
c) believing God will save us even though we have the tools to know the truth the ability to use the tools but we refuse to live by the truth and use the tools we have to save ourselves and thereby become free.

The biggest problem with that get all excited about uniting against the tyranny of Corp. U.S. is that they are blind to the truth having no remedy so they bail out of "the system" hell bent for a rebellion even the scripture says cannot be won with conventional weapons of war. Would that we could instead follow the admonition of the King of Kings and unite with truth to legally, lawfully and peacefully reseat our original jurisdiction government thereby taking back the control our nation in accord with law.

[teamlaw.org]
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 28, 2008 07:40PM

You are being played, of course they don't want you to dig into the details because they use the details to control you, you cannot live your life and own land freely, you have to pay off the government to have or get anything, their cut, it's just business.

[members.iimetro.com.au]
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 29, 2008 06:46AM

Mrkim, watch this guy, I'm sure you will like him!

Constitution Class By Michael Badnarik Part 1 of 7


shadez, if you're out there you should definitely watch it, at the very least, please.... click here on Part 2 and go to.... 50:30, listen closely and watch to at least 52:15.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: June 29, 2008 10:23PM


Here is the same thing on YouTube and it will play itself all the way through...


[www.youtube.com]