image stats
rating
2.82
votes
76
views
906
uploader
woberto
comments
2
date added
2025-12-07
category
None Yet
previous votes
Loading..
log in
indent login to site
indent create account
indent recover password
also liked
top tags
IOTW assets babes boobs car gif gipple moothammock niceass peanutsmuggler restinpeace schmoo shirt starwars stupid
Sure why not
Rate the image:

"a group of girls looking at a phone"

  • Facebook
  • X/Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Pinterest
  • E-mail
Rate image:
[ | | |
| ]
uploader: woberto
date: 2025-12-07
Comments for: Sure why not
woberto Report This Comment
Date: December 13, 2025 02:14AM

Like I give a shit BUT...
...this is not the governments responsibility.
...this is not private industry's problem.
(matrix)
Can you guess who is responsible for a minor?
THE PARENTS!
(*facepalm*)
FFS the Australian Governemnt is fucked in the head. Don't get me started on the VIC Government.
Parental Controls exist on every piece of hardware your dependent children own (which you bought).
Parental Controls exiting on most software and if not you can still restrict it using other software.
quasi Report This Comment
Date: December 13, 2025 10:56AM

You'd love Florida then. [www.orlandoweekly.com]

I'm sure you did everything your parents told you to do drinking smiley Do you have kids?

From the article: "The law, a focus of former House Speaker and now candidate for Governor Paul Renner, passed in 2024 and prohibits Floridians younger than 14 from having social media accounts on platforms that deploy “addictive features.” The law, which scored bipartisan support, also requires parental consent for youngsters age 14 and 15 to have accounts on those same platforms."



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 13/12/2025 10:59AM by quasi.