Mrkim
Report This Comment
Date: September 24, 2008 03:45PM
I won't go quite that far just yet, but I do have to at least wonder about the validity of such a statement
Monster1
Report This Comment
Date: September 24, 2008 07:47PM
So trashing Palin is protected under 'Free Speech'
but messing with B. Hussein Obama is not....
shaDEz
Report This Comment
Date: September 24, 2008 09:09PM
be careful with what you say...
means that there are consequences for speaking freely; thus no such thing as free speech
Idgf though... I trash all of those fucks on a daily basis. Not quite fascism yet, though I would prepare to opperate within a fascist country just in case
Chuckle Charley
Report This Comment
Date: September 25, 2008 12:44AM
When going to the Big Island Of Hawaii remember Akaka Falls in Honomu and Rainbow Falls, Hilo City , has people stealing from parked cars from Tourists and Residents , alike ! Remember Drive Safer and Slower in all Communities wherein people and children live on this Big Isle . - Concerned Chuckle Charley
brokntoad
Report This Comment
Date: September 25, 2008 06:39PM
MrKim "I won't go quite that far just yet, but I do have to at least wonder about the validity of such a statement"
A little kid draws a sloppy message on a t-shirt and that makes you wonder if the message might be true?
Mrkim
Report This Comment
Date: September 25, 2008 07:02PM
If I said the sloppy T shirt was a selling point to the logic your words would have had some relevance. When I write/speak I'm quite clear and concise in what my words mean, and if not, clarification is never more than a few keestrokes away.
So .... attempts at manipulating what I've written are pretty futile, and will never find purchase here or elsewhere BT
brokntoad
Report This Comment
Date: September 26, 2008 12:01AM
so... you read the statement "Obama, A terrorists best friend" and you went hmmmmm thats logical. I understand now but am curious as how you came to that conclusion?
Mrkim
Report This Comment
Date: September 26, 2008 12:18AM
I see it as unnecessary, but here it is again for clarity
I won't go quite that far just yet, but I do have to at least wonder about the validity of such a statement
Now let me break that all down for ya since simple statements seem to somehow confound you BT
"I won't go quite that far just yet" means exactly what it says, but to reinforce the contextual message, let me expound a bit and say :
I won't go quite that far (
because I have only personal assumptions, yet no solid proof)
just yet (
since I reserve making such an decision without further evidence)
The second part of the statement "
but I do have to at least wonder about the validity of such a statement" means with some of what I've read about possible ties to the Arab world, statements he's been quoted as having made and various positions he's taken, at least make me wonder if there's truth to this idea (or these ideas).
Hopefully that clears it all up nicely for ya BT .... and thanks for playing
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 26/09/2008 12:28AM by Mrkim.
