tjbustem
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 12:31PM
Why would somebody rate this a 1? Is it that poor of a picture or is it they just don't like the poster?
fossil_digger
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 12:35PM
just a peckerhead anon that gives everything a 1.

he must think a 1 is bad for the poster, when in actuality all those 1's could be the reason i'm the #1 poster. keep 'em coming dipshit!
Anonymous
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 02:28PM
Yeah....14 y/o's are beautiful things.
tjbustem
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 02:50PM
Unless you know this girl how do you know her age? Besides, you haven't been to the pool or beach lately have you? Most of those 14 year olds have less cotton on than you can find in an aspirin bottle. Don't blame the girls, blame the parents.
ORLANDO399
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 04:12PM
Met Art posting chics under age,yeah right and im the pope.Looks to me like she's in her early twenties.
Mint
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 05:02PM
1 nothing special
Anonymous
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 06:17PM
I rate it a 1 also because it looks airbrushed (I know, photoshopped) to me. A lot of metart looks like artificial smoothing has been applied, don't get me wrong they do it better than a lot of other sites, that is to say with miore sublety.
Mrkim
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 07:29PM
I don't ever really care how anyone rates any of my pics, I mean really, like I'm gonna win a trip to Paris or somethin
I do however take exception with 2 notions posted above.
1. Another very suspicious mention by an oddly "anonymous" poster about this chic bein 14 .... sounds like someone we all know is prone to such comments who otherwise posts under a username ... hmmmm, why doncha grind that ax some more dillweed
2. If Met Art were prone to airbrushing dudn it seem as if the moles and freckles would be the 1st things they'd take out? And why in the hell would they even bother to airbrush a non nude pic at all?
In my experiences Met Art is one of the premier sites who actually seek to do all natural photography of ones just like this chic, who are simply beautiful without trying to "play" with their images at all. With likely a few thousand Met Art pics in my collection I've yet to have come across even one that seems as if it's been manipulated.
Then again, all things are possible, so as always, YMMV
tjbustem
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 07:47PM
I still don't see how it rates a 1. someone took the time and effort to do it and it should rate more than some lame ass unairbrushed/photoshoped pic.
ORLANDO399
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 08:12PM
Seem's like all the chic pics are getting ones..hmmm
SkullandChains
Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 08:42PM
Wasn't me who rated it with a 1. Not going to rate it either.