Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 03, 2007 09:27PM
I think the joke is on you.
He lived like a king for the last 30 years.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: January 03, 2007 11:21PM
He live like a king off the blood and tears of his people.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 04, 2007 12:16AM
True enough. Put in power by the dickheads (or their ancestors, politically or
literally depending on who you blame) who were trying to take over the planet 30
years ago.
I'm fine with Hussein being overthrown. NOW: GET HIS FORMER BACKERS.
IMPEACH A BUSHFUCK.
SAVE THE WORLD.
(And keep going until you get to somebody who doesn't floss their teeth with
treasury notes and Defense department budget requests.)
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 04, 2007 03:43AM
jgoins ....
chickenlittle
You have proved your
moron status
again.
Saddam
did not kill 95% of the Iraqis the US has accused him of.
The current Shia militias and Sunni secret security forces are responsbile for
those killings during Saddam's reign.
These are the same people
that the US military CAN'T contain in Iraq now.
Saddam did kill people but the number is very small. And he did it with the full
knowledge and acceptance of the US.
Get off the farm some time you idiot.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: January 04, 2007 01:21PM
The killings were done on his watch with his full knowledge and approval.
Beast, have you noticed how your responses always seem to consist of childish
name calling and insults. That is a clear sign of a weak stance and lower
mentality. I am so glad I don't have to resort to your tactics.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 05, 2007 08:19AM
jgoins ...
chickenlittle
because your comments are that of a naive 13yr old.
Get a fuckin clue
bitch. You spread Limbaugh and Hannity propaganda that only retards listen
too.
You follow the Limbaugh script to a T by claiming the moral high ground for
spreading hate and clearly failing to defend anything you say. That is the sign
of a lack of intellectual skill.
Nice misapplication of american standards to Iraq.
Saddam did not have control of Iraq. He had control of the money in Iraq. that's
it.
Maybe you should get a fucking clue.
if the US military can't do jack shit to stop
the sectarian violence in Iraq, what the fuck was Saddam going to do to stop it
?
Iraq is not the US. Iraq is not a police state where the police or military
could bring everything to a halt. That is a fantasy in Iraq.
You have no fucking clue about Iraq under Saddam or now so you should ask
questions or keep your mouth shut.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 05, 2007 12:25PM
happy day
jgoins Report This Comment Date: January 06, 2007 01:18PM
Well beast I haven't listened to Rush in years and seldom watch Hannity so I
don't get any of my beliefs from them. My beliefs are my own and have been for
over 50 years. These people you think guide me probably get their guidance from
me. I guess you didn't take long enough to mourn your loss when Saddam was
executed.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 06, 2007 08:27PM
jgoins ...
chickenlittle
You supported a poor foreign policy where the US went into muslim land and took
advantage of the people? So you are one of the morons that caused 9-11?
nice going asshole!
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: January 06, 2007 10:00PM
"Saddam did not have control of Iraq. He had control of the money in Iraq.
that's it.
Maybe you should get a fucking clue.
if the US military can't do jack shit to stop the sectarian violence in Iraq,
what the fuck was Saddam going to do to stop it ?"
i see your position has yet again taken a turn. so this week he didn't have
control? wow! what's next?
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: January 06, 2007 10:01PM
and don't even claim you never said that Saddam was the only thing holding the
different factions at bay. i will quote you.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 06, 2007 10:55PM
monkey killing monkey killing monkey over pieces of the ground
don't these silly humans know that this holy eden has enough to go around
maybe we should be asking ourselves what the absolute true cause of all this
killing is and fix that?
Civilians reported killed by military intervention in Iraq
Min-Max
52810-58408 as of today this does not include people deemed military
combatants
only civilians.
[
www.iraqbodycount.org]
what makes one such human life so much better than another
what makes ones childs life worth so much more than another
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 06, 2007 11:48PM
CRAPPER
I didn't say anything inconsistent. You also quoted me out of context. Were were
talking about police or military control of Iraq.
Jackass!
Saddam did NOT control the people of Iraq with police or military might as I
stated to
Chickenlittle
Saddam
DID control Iraq and the world with FEAR of the possibility of
things as I stated.
Saddam controlled Iran (and more) by spreading lies about having WMDs.
Saddam controlled the Iraqi population with myths about torture and death at the
hands of his "people".
Saddam's "people" were so few in number that Iraq was a prime target
to be attacked from Iran or terrorist groups.
The Sunni and Shia were fighting as they are right now (while the US can't do
shit to stop it) with the FEAR that Saddam's people could come for you. The US
military does come after these people and they still are not dettered one
bit.
If you are going to make a comment about consistency of ideas then you should at
least keep it in context. Then you won't look like you are grasping at straws.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: January 07, 2007 01:01PM
Beast, I will stoop to your level a little. You are a fucking moron. The
mythins you atated were proven as not myths, bodies were found in mass graves
and the inspection teams found wmds in the decade they inspected Iraq and
destroyed them so they weren't myths. Denial is not just a river in Africa, it
is also living large in you head.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: January 07, 2007 07:25PM
HEEEEEE HAAAAAAAW!!!!
pro_junior Report This Comment Date: January 07, 2007 07:46PM
aDCBeast, I do not usually read your posts, and haven't read anything you have
posted in probably the last three months...
Upon reading your comments in this thread I have noticed that your spelling and
grammar seems to have improved.
Good for you Beast.
Did you take some classes? were you tutored?
I am an autodidact...
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: January 08, 2007 12:14AM
he realized that spell check wasn't just for Alyssa Milano.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 08, 2007 10:31AM
po_junior
Nice backhanded Limbaugh tactic. when you can't attack the ideas ... attack
grammar and spelling. A true sign that you can't refute what I say.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 08, 2007 10:48AM
jgoins ...
chickenlittle
Sure the people killed by Iranians were in mass graves. What the fuck was Saddam
going to do with them ? Do you remember the 200,000 soldiers in body bags found
in a warehouse in the south of Iraq in 2003? Killed during the Iran\Iraq war.
Why did they stay in a warehouse ? Because Saddam did not want to show the
weakness of Iraq. That Iraq's military sucked.
Iraq is not the US. Damn. When will you get that through your fucking head ?
They don't send dead and diseased carcasses back home in Iraq. They bury them in
mass graves or store them in warehouses. Get a clue bitch.
The inspection teams sent into Iraq post 1991 found the chemical weapons that
the US sold Iraq in the 80s. However the inspection teams found that Iraq was
not producing nuclear and biological weapons after that moment. And they
continued to find Iraq not producing new weapons up to the 2003 invasion.
Try harder next time. Trying to group decades into a few short years in a lame
attempt to have evidence of wmds for both time periods made your point
stupid.
To show you how stupid you really are: To quote you
"the inspection teams found wmds in the decade they inspected Iraq and
destroyed them"
If they destroyed them (the weapons the US sold them and we knew were there)
then how did Bush justify his BS for the 2003 occupation ? Some WMDs slipped by
the inspectors ? BS.
You nullified the argument for the 2003 invasion and you are too stupid to know
it.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 08, 2007 10:50AM
if the US military can't do jack shit to
stop the sectarian violence in Iraq, what the fuck was Saddam going to do to
stop it ?
Answer the question bitch!
jgoins Report This Comment Date: January 08, 2007 12:18PM
"Nice backhanded Limbaugh tactic. when you can't attack the ideas ...
" you insult and belittle.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: January 08, 2007 03:00PM
and prove how foot stomping childish the whole "mission" of yours is.
pro_junior Report This Comment Date: January 08, 2007 05:37PM
aDCBeast Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> po_junior
>
> Nice backhanded Limbaugh tactic. when you can't
> attack the ideas ... attack grammar and spelling.
> A true sign that you can't refute what I say.
Beast you are so used to people attacking you that you don't even recognize a
compliment...
how is stating that your spelling and grammar has improved equate to attacking
you?
sorry to disapoint you, but I do not listen to Limbaugh or any other political
pundit...its all just a bunch if bullshit rhetoric...much like what is written
in your posts...I am not interested in it...I believe our government is corrupt
beyond repair and any discussion you and I may have about that, in this forum,
is a futile waste of time.
refute what you say? hardly...I dont care.
po_junior? is that the best name insult you could come up with?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/01/2007 08:20PM by pro_junior.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 09, 2007 02:12AM
po_junior
Damn you're paranoid. It was a purposeful misspelling like the one above in
direct response to your spelling and grammar comment.
I could care less to engage in a debate. I will crush a statement that is false.
Many people like to repeat falsehoods on this site. They don't know what they
are saying are falsehoods and god damn if they won't defend the falsehood with
their life.
You don't have to listen to Limbaugh and Hannity to repeat their propaganda. The
crap they repeat is repeated on many media sources. Most people don't know that
the garbage they are hearing on FOX, CNN, MSNBC news has been copy on Limbaugh
and Hannity as well.
The difference is that Limbaugh and Hannity are out in the open about having a
NEOCon slant. The other sources who report the same propaganda are not out in
the open but they do slant.
Too many conservative ameircans think FOX news is good. Too many liberal
americans think CNN is good. The fact is they all sell the President's
propaganda as if they were on the payroll like Armstrong Williams.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: January 09, 2007 01:00PM
Beast, absolutely all media are biased and spew their own slant on things. You
follow the media which is slanted in the direction you want to follow. You
claim you are an independant thinker but in reality you follow others who
believe as you do.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 13, 2007 08:25PM
jgoins ...
chickenlittle
But when the president pays for a new organization to spew their propaganda,
that is
illegal.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: January 13, 2007 10:49PM
you still haven't fixed that zipper.
