Emancipating movement of provinces against England is connected with colonial
form of board in Mother country.
The English democracy which arisen in 13 century as the form of colonial board
served interests of barons and peers, in modern England - to the same noblemen.
Provinces are practically as dominions and protectorates. Struggle of English
provinces is conducted for free participation in government against
limited democracy.
Development of English democratic colonization threatens also to safety
of the world. The state with the out-of-date form of board where the lie can
become the reason of war should not have the nuclear weapon.

Asia has appeared not ready to oppose lie and hypocrisy,
therefore democracy in Asia is shown in the worst form,
as imposing of colonial standards, suppression of freedom,
destruction of culture and morals.
Anticolonial war in Iraq is directed to restoration
of statehood, free development of a society.

=Deutschland, Deutschland Uber Alles!= Heil Oleg!

What form of partition of the world constant membership in Secutiry council of the United
nations has?
Constant membership should be replaced to elective.
How the Secutiry council of the United Nations can affect an aggressive policy of
monarchic authority of England possessing the nuclear weapon?
England as discredited country by colonial policy
and by occupation of Iraq should be excluded from Secutiry council of the United Nations and to become state without weapon.

After attack to London, the policy of democratic colonization
in Iraq should have weaken, but it has not occured.
As politician Tony Blair does not consider that bears the personal responsibility for occupation of Iraq because idea of colonialism is inspired by the queen Elizabeth II?

The English monarchy, actively aspiring to influence world politics, finds the participation through English democracy - creation of the deformed negative information (as a freedom of speech), imposings of permissiveness (as freedom of the rights). Acceptance by a democratized society of English democratic values - without English system of the totalitarian control - decomposes the state up to a feudal-bureaucratic colony. With growth of movement for freedom and the truth the English society is divided into supporters and opponents of democratic colonization. Desperate effective resistance and migration become means of struggle for emancipating the colonized countries.

My mother always said that talking to oneself is the first sign of madness, Oleg.

Basis of the constitution of Iraq offered by the USA is a restriction of the rights and freedom. Occupational armies cannot be in the territory of Iraq without free will of people. All conversations about the constitution of Iraq have no sense because there is no free Iraq. Acceptance of the colonial constitution by the state occupied by USA is a prolongation of a colonial policy of USA concerning to Iraq.


HISTORY REPEATS
www.genevo.org/p2i.htm

To establish the democratic government in Iraq
english-speaking neo-Nazis occupied Iraq.
Iraq became neo-colony. Civil emancipating
war has begun.
To make the constitutional democratic order,
occupation of Iraq should become termless,
the constitution is accepted for this purpose.
The democratic government of Iraq serves
interests of neo-colonialists in deliveries of oil to
support democratic stability in the country.

The basic question of the Iraq constitution is legalization and fastening of spheres of
influence, sources of enrichment in Iraq by neo-colonialists.
Local authorities, created by neo-colonialists, will receive nothing from such repartition,
their role will be maintenance of stability,
maintenance of tolerance to plunder of the country.
Political dissociation of Iraq, while there is the absence of national ideology,
is fixing in the constitution as democracy and refusal of freedom, and creates
the Iraq democratic colony.

He's like a Russian Serdar Argic.

Terrorists-anticolonialists:
Mohammad Sidique Khan,
Hasib Hussain,
Germaine Lindsay,
Shehzad Tanweer
Before session of the G8 in England, in the world ideological center of
neo-colonialism, anticolonialists development of democratic colonization in Asia was stopped by the life of four people, having begun anti-colonial resistance in England.
After freeing Iraq the history will assess, giving names.

Colonialists have replaced ideas of Freedom to ideas of
Democracy in the constitution of Iraq, having named Iraq Democratic instead of Free.
Colonialists and their voters suggest Iraquis to receive Freedom by
a life?

After the Second world war, countries of Africa and Asia received
independence which consisted in creation of controlled democratic modes. Colonies being released from military political occupation, were becoming under control of the Source of colonialism through financial-political colonization. Independent democratic colonies have not become the free states, the created democratic modes served economic interests of the Source of colonialism. Famine, poverty, emigration have become consequences of financial colonial political control.
Using military-political pressure, London and Washington, through acceptance of the constitution, offer to Iraq to become a financial-political colony instead of military political control.

The fascinating thing about this guy is why he thinks posting to the plus613 forum is a good idea.

The basic long-term reasons of a rise in oil prices
are still an inflation of dollar and occupation of Iraq.
USA try to increase an extraction of oil from Iraq,
for these purposes additional armed forces are sent.
If US hopes for acceptance of the colonial constitution
will not be justified the prices for oil will continue growth.
The second country of the world by reserves of oil,
lives on the anglo-american grant from oil, received for restraint
of emancipating movement.

The policy of the government of England has led to acts of terrorism in London.
It is connected with occupation of Iraq and Toni Blair and Elizabeth's II belief
in colonialism. Despite of internal problems in the USA caused by hurricane,
policy of George Bush in Iraq (occupation of Iraq by means of
the Iraq democrats who supported the Anglo-American neo-nazis,
and by the European diplomacy) may be compared with ""velvet season" of
hitlerism, occupation of the East Europe.

The colonial constitution of Iraq lobbied by the democratic government
became the reason of growth of interethnic collisions. Such contradictions, as consequence of military colonization, are characteristic in other proEnglish democracies also. By means of the democratic government of Iraq, colonizers have directed the state to interethnic opposition, to disintegration of the state and colonization of separate areas.

Though the United Nations is the international organization,
it should work interacting with the regional organizations,
promoting creation where there are no of them. A priority
of the United Nations is to finish the international conflicts,
such as occupation of Iraq, instead of doing orders of
Anglo-American nazis. If the United Nations is not able to
solve the international problems - reform of this
organization will be just as dissolution and creation
of the organization on new conditions and rules.

Historical development of the countries, their entering to the international arena,
is restrained by the ideological scholasticism of London and Washington.
Economic backlog of KNDR is connected with economic isolation,
created artificially by Washington. London with the out-of-date system
of the authority, representing threat to the world by presence
of the nuclear weapon, `show`s an example of obscurantism,
trying to limit development of Iran and to run the country to the Middle Ages.
London and Washington have already made all this concerning to Iraq,
authority of which shows senselessness board in the colonized country.

Political scientists of London and Washington in Iraq and in the world have developed
a series of PR-companies, directed: to convincing the public
in an invented image of democratic authority of Iraq and the order established there.,
separation of the country and colonization.

Financed by London and Washington and created artificially
democratic аuthority support tolerance of people to colonial occupation.
Democratic colonizers use educational backlog of Iraq – it is difficult
for people to understand colonial ways of a robbery
by having little education.

Spontaneous transfering of authority from hands of
invaders to emancipating movement in Iraq can cause big
number of victims. It is necessary for regional and international
organizations to come into contact with emancipating movement
to help with the organization of transfering of authority, to create
system of amnesty to pro-American Iraq democrats.
To not allow disintegration of the country into the North and the South.

The next large act of genocide will probably be emancipated
city Ale-Khaim, the plan of London and Washington may be
in concentration the guerrilla in the city for carpet bombing the
city. Emancipating war undermines colonialism of London and
Washington.
The basic centers of where the Anglo-American militarians are
located, are in areas of extracting of oil and Bagdad. Washington
and London hardly will throw large forces from protection of oil
extracting on suppression of emancipating movement. More likely,
tactics of suppression of revolts of Anglo-Americans will be carpet
bombing and retaliatory operations, use of the technical superiority.
Nevertheless, guerrillas can win, if their army becomes imperceptible.
Tactics of insurgents can become emancipating of the
cities and transfering of management to national structures,
without direct collisions with coalition armies. The main thing
is that there would be no pro-American democrats in management.
Probably, insurgents will be able to emancipate the country having
created wide guerrilla emancipating movement. And how do you think?

Adolf Hitler aspired to colonize the world by military occupation,
Georges Bush – by democratic occupation.
In 60 years, methods of colonization were improved-
through involving the country into conflicts, demonization of an image,
economic blockade, gambe on national interests.
By these means London and Washington aspire to occupy Iran,
to replace free development of the country onto colonial democratic.
The answer of London and Washington to emancipating movement becomes
increasing spendings on war and democrats. After attack to London
colonialistic movement stopped, positions of colonialists weaken,
but now revanchists restore unity of a coalition in Iraq, investing
more actively into the Chechen armed democrats in the Russian Federation.
If after London, new anticolonialistic movements are created in Warsaw,
Madrid, Rome, Kiev, the countries-participants of a coalition, - they will
receive the international resonance and make active new forces for struggle
with colonialism.

The third capital of colonialism?

For London and Washington participation of the countries
of a coalition is necessary for a political substantiation of
colonization. After London and Washington the third active
participant of policy of colonialism is the satellite of
colonizers - Warsaw.
Warsaw took active participation in colonization of Iraq,
section on to sectors and the organization of oil extracting.
The president of Poland Alexander Kvasnevsky, his
voters, political parties support occupation of
Iraq as mean of safety of Poland and the world.

The colonial policy of Warsaw is directed to destruction
of the democratized states up to English administrative
units or states. Advancing the general ideas of colonialism,
Warsaw hopes that English-speaking colonialists will pay
to Poland for support of a colonial policy. Participation in
democratization of the countries of the East Europe, in colonization of Asia,
promotion to the East for Warsaw - source of development of its economy.
Profascist Warsaw is used by London and Washington as key capital
for expansion of front of colonialism in the Europe and the world.

[news.bbc.co.uk]

Cancellation of the pact of Molotov-Ribbentrop has become a mistake
at the Yalta conference about dividing of Poland,
we would not see development of neo-fascism in Warsaw now.
To where Alexander Kvasnevsky’s profascist government conducts
Poland, to final section of Poland?
In difference from Rome which has decided to confuse the public by
leading out armies from Iraq, Warsaw never refused
from colonization in structure of London and Washington and also does
obstacles to leading out armies of the countries of a coalition.