Posted by: Bob [x] - (82.41.43.---)
Date: March 23, 2005 11:26PM
Here's a lovely story about America and the middle east. It perhaps might tell a few of you why those 'sand niggers' you all hate so much hate you so much.
In the 1950's Iran complains that Britain is stealing it's oil and wants them to pay them for it.
Britain asks for America's help in continuing it's nice little money maker.
President Eisenhower declares the democratically elected president a "communist".
C.I.A assasinates the President in a Coup'd'etat.
Shah of Iran put in power by the U.S.
Shah repressive of Iranian people (Saddam Style)
Shah overthrown 20 years later by Iranian people.
Ayatollah Khomeini becomes leader because of his Anti-American sentiment.
So the Iranians are anti-american because...
American's put the Shah in power for their own means while he abused the Iranian people.

I like that story a lot, even more so because it's a true story.
Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (82.41.43.---)
Date: March 23, 2005 11:49PM
Actually the story is only partly true. I remember hearing about this and I am pretty sure Britain shares FAR more responsibility for this than you are letting on. I will check with the actual facts.
Posted by: Bob [x] - (82.41.43.---)
Date: March 24, 2005 05:13PM
Your right, Britain got billions of dollars of oil at a way lower price than they shoud've. Just like showing examples of Cause and Effect. I watched a great documentary on TV last night about American foreign policy, a real eye opener. The CIA classed 9/11 as 'blowback' caused from previous secret operations. 9/11 could've been predicted because the cause was American operations in the middle east, effect = 9/11.
Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (82.41.43.---)
Date: March 24, 2005 07:46PM
Apparently Britain controlled the oil in Iran and agreed to pay a royalty to the government. However, Britain somehow coerced them into accepting a one sided deal where the Iranian government had to accept whatever figures the British decided to provide. The Iranians were not allowed to audit the oil company. So obviously the British were not paying the agreed royalties and were making billions. The Iranian government finally decided to kick the British out. Well Britain decided to retaliate by convincing the Americans that what in fact was happening was that the Iranian government was influenced by the Soviet Union and was nationalizing private industry, and that the Soviet Union was going to assert it's control. So yes, the CIA became involved and help overthrow the government.
By the way, that must have been an interesting documentary. What channel was it on, what was it called?
Posted by: mark [x] - (82.41.43.---)
Date: March 26, 2005 02:48PM
man, anon-whatever just showed us the intellect of the typical bush-voter -> as dumb as bread.
i guess i'm beginning to understand how this could happen again. poor america ... :/
Posted by: Republifucks [x] - (82.41.43.---)
Date: March 26, 2005 04:26PM
Yeah, I'm seeing "cut and paste" boy (Anon...etc.) all over this site and the phrase "dumber than a bag of hammers" jumps instantly to mind.

I think he's here just to cruise the gay porn. Which wouldn't be so bad if he'd come out to himself. Maybe his brain would begin to get a little blood flow.
Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (82.41.43.---)
Date: June 19, 2005 10:55AM
Hey mark, did you miss the class in second grade when greater than and lesser than was discussed? I'm assuming so, especially since you just said that the typical bush hater is greater than "as dumb as bread". Just a thought.....
Your Name: 
Your Email: