The Central Scrutnizer Report This Comment Date: December 01, 2006 08:48PM
Well. Yeah. Roger that. It's almost a cliche except to those who are most
susceptable to it to begin with. Sort of the intellectually vacuous equivalent
of "Canary's in a Coal Mine". They're still saying "Problem?
What Problem?".
Just like Alfred E. Newman. What? Me Worry?
We should've seen it coming. And stopped it. But Greed and Stupidity are two
very powerful forces and it's done it's damage now.....
Maybe it can be fixed if the Democrats can stop infighting and avoid letting
their better, if idealistic and (comparitively) altruisitc instincts be derailed
by Big Corporate PACS.
FIVE STARS.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 01, 2006 08:51PM
Here's a good book that has 20/20 vision on this topic:
[
www.prwatch.org]
I highly recommend it.
Watch the YouTube video. It's hysterical. And dead on.
It's at: [
www.prwatch.org]
Enjoy!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 01, 2006 09:11PM
I like this qoute myself:
"How are nations ruled and led into war? Politicians lie to journalists and
then believe those lies when they see them in print."
—Austrian journalist Karl Kraus, explaining the causes of the First World War.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 01, 2006 09:48PM
Ann Coulter is a transvestite. And conservatives drool all over him. It's
funny. They're all homophobes, yet they're all in love with a gay man.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: December 02, 2006 01:08PM
The democrats will lead us into the end of the world far faster than the
republicans ever could. Just pop your popcorn sit back relax and watch.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 02, 2006 03:43PM
jgoins is one of those idiot conservatives who still love Bush -- although he
has run up the deficit so high that our fucking great grandkids won't even have
it paid off. And we're styill in an unwinnable war in Iraq -- a war that is
deteriorating into a civil war, and has killed nearly 3,000 American
soldiers.
Yeah, those Republicans sure do a great job -- NOT!!!
jgoins Report This Comment Date: December 03, 2006 12:44PM
There has been a deficit under all presidents repubs and dems alike so I don't
care about that. I suported the invasion and removal of Saddam. I differ only
in what we did after we found him. He shot have been shot on sight and we
should have just pulled out and let the Iraqis deal with the aftermath
themselves. We should have pulled our troops out of Iraq when Saddam was
defeated and then we should have repeated the exorcise in Syria and Iran.
Rebuilding the nations we were in war against has always been a mistake. I
supported Bush in the invasion of Iraq but not so much in the limited method and
the rebuilding areas. I am not afraid Bush will become our dictator like some
of you. He will leave office after the next election. I am more than a little
worried about what will take his place because of all the cowardice of the
American people today we will most likely get a weak pussy for president who
will allow us to be attacked again and again and will allow the radical muslims
to grow in strength and bring their wanted holy war to us.
messyflatmate Report This Comment Date: December 08, 2006 06:00AM
Question, jgoins - Just exactly what is Bush doing to (a) stop the US from
being attacked again or (b) preventing the radical muslims from growing in
strength
The current actions of the US in Iraq, and in Palestine, has only one effect -
to further alienate and radicalise muslims. They don't need to carry out
attacking actions in the mainland US because there is a vast body of americans
available for slaughter a lot closer to home (soldiers in Iraq, in case I lost
you along the way).
Unless, of course, you think the current situation is pacifying these guys - if
so, perhaps you could shed some light on this.