Placelowerplace Report This Comment Date: April 08, 2008 06:16PM
and this war in Iraq won't be the last either
Mint Report This Comment Date: April 08, 2008 06:38PM
nevermind rather not go into this again
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/04/2008 06:40PM by Mint.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: April 08, 2008 06:47PM
chickenshit!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: April 08, 2008 09:08PM
fossil....
PW Report This Comment Date: April 08, 2008 10:05PM
not only that...
Germany NEVER attacked us until we were attacking them.
Korea never attacked us
Vietnam never attacked us
PW Report This Comment Date: April 08, 2008 10:10PM
also...
not to degrade but, in all this time in iraq only 4000 have died. thats pretty
fucking amazing.
god bless the troops and fuck all the nay sayers here at home asking them to
come home b4 all is done. if we come out now like the hippie left says, they
will probably get elected and when the psycho's in iraq start killing everyone
the dem's will THEN cry for peace and send the boys in anyway...
if democrats had brains, they would be republicans.
shaDEz Report This Comment Date: April 08, 2008 10:48PM
all this time, in Iraq,
only 4000 have died... so I guess, by that
logic, that Iraqi civilians are sub-human. Over 1 million have died! This is not
all that new of a phenomenon though(the national chauvinistic thinking that
American lives are more valuable than non-American lives), but is a thinking
that we have to do away with.
And speaking of Korea, and Vietnam(among many others); just like them, Iraq
never attacked the U.S. either.
The Democrats are not going to pull out any troops either. Basically if Hillary
is victorious, this occupation will continue, just needs a new strategy. McCain:
"a hundred years of war", Obama: "we need to increase our
soldiers by 100,000". It doesn't matter who is the president assuming that
there is an election. Whoever is the president is the president of the USA,
which doesn't do humanity any good.
The elections are just to pull the people back into the empire, instead of doing
what they need to be doing, taking to the streets in the millions, and taking
over the state.
"Elections are controlled by the bourgeoisie; are not the means through
which basic decisions are made in any case; and are really for the primary
purpose of legitimizing the system and the policies and actions of the ruling
class, giving them the mantle of a "popular mandate", and of
channeling, confining, and controlling the political activity of the masses of
people."-pp 68
Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That?, Bob
Avakian, Banner Press
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: April 08, 2008 10:55PM
Clinton turned Osama Loose,So "All" of the people who have died are
his fault.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: April 09, 2008 12:47AM
=== Clinton turned Osama Loose,So "All" of the people who === have
died are his fault.
No. Actually the guy who sent our troops in is responsible for the deaths of
4000 soldiers and the crippling injuries of nearly a thousand other soldiers. We
could have bombed Iraq into the stone age. We could have used chemical weapons
or dirty bombs to contaminate the area of the oil fields so that the would never
be able to recover their economy or technology. What IS Iraq without oil money?
A bunch of desert goat farmers. Can impoverished, subsistence farmers REALLY
threaten the most powerful country in the world? Nope. We are the masters of the
air, the gods of hellfire and lightning. We can destroy our enemies people,
technology, and raze their soil without a single soldier setting foot on the
earth. But we did not.
ORLANDO399 Report This Comment Date: April 09, 2008 04:03AM
uhhhh shadez,how many iraqi civilians died under sadaam's rule?
90130_ Report This Comment Date: April 09, 2008 06:04AM
Good point 'Lando.
And anon's post preceding yours.
If we were allowed to finish things prim and proper the first time around, this
one would never have been necessary.
In 1991, we blew the shit out of every living thing on the road to Basra, and
we're at the fucking doorsteps to Saddam's palace and then told to stop and go
home.
Mint Report This Comment Date: April 09, 2008 06:53AM
PW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> not only that...
>
> Germany NEVER attacked us until we were attacking
> them.
>
> Korea never attacked us
>
> Vietnam never attacked us
Correction. WWII Japan attacked us and Germany declared war on us. THEN we
attacked them. WWI They attacked our Atlantic ships first.
Vietnam. Although Johnson may have been the one that declared war, the conflict
started with Eisenhower. North Vietnam asked us for help with the French..we
sided with France so they turned to USSR and China
Korea. /shurg. no way we would let those commies win
Love how it conveniently left off Gulf War and Iraq/Afganistan
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: April 09, 2008 02:35PM
And may I add:
Afghanistan & Iraq is payback to the ragheads for 911,
and next time you fuck with us it's Iran & Siria MF....
ORLANDO399 Report This Comment Date: April 09, 2008 04:33PM
Good point minty,but the real terrorist was clinton by allowing sadaam to waste
innocent kuwaitans
shaDEz Report This Comment Date: April 11, 2008 03:19AM
>ORLANDO399
>uhhhh shadez,how many iraqi civilians died under sadaam's rule?
so the U.S. then is a
"lesser evil" is what you're saying;
right?
>the real terrorist was clinton by allowing sadaam to waste innocent
kuwaitans
the U.S. imperialists are also terrorists, it
was afterall the sanctions
imposed by the U.S. during the Clinton years that killed a million Iraqi
civilians. And Clinton
did bomb Bagdhad before the impeachment hearings,
killing Iraqis, to distract from the scandle. The reason the U.S. is in Iraq now
is because it is necessary to hold this strategic position, in the interests of
imperial expansion.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/04/2008 03:29AM by shaDEz.
ORLANDO399 Report This Comment Date: April 11, 2008 07:02AM
I will agree with ya on the stategic position.When Mcain takes over,all eyes
will be on syria and iran.Might as well,since were already over there.
PW Report This Comment Date: April 12, 2008 10:10PM
it was the U.N. that imposed sanctions not just the U.S.
i dont think anyone would miss the iraqis if they were all killed.
the middle east as a whole should be wiped off the map.
then we drop a luxor hotel smack dab on top of mecca. those people are savages
and not 1 has earned the right to live.
zxz555 Report This Comment Date: April 13, 2008 09:50AM
and the winner
is...
there are no winners, only losers. with a skewed view of history that they got
from TV.
