Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 06:57PM

I'd take the one on his left, thats it. If being rich gets who those other 3 hags, I guess I can live without it.

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 06:57PM

nice wall paneling!

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 07:00PM

....dark room....3 or 4 bottles of wine.... youll never know the difference. try to look on the bright side mr.1574

Sokratesz Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 07:01PM

the one on his left is the only one whose shoes match his', so its probably his wife and not one of the models. He got taste, too!

Anthony Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 08:09PM

Yeah, I wish I was rich so I could have wall panelling like that. That is some NICE wall panelling!

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 08:16PM

The one farthest to his left is used for maid service, cooking and cleaning.
The one farthest to his right, is used to change channels on his tv, bring him his beer or wine, and also he lets her jump in his bed 1 hour before he gets in it (bed warmer so to speak) then he asks her to leave.

The one on his immediate right, is a stand in just in case his prime filet can't perform sexual favors for him. He does keep a paper or plastic bag (her choice) beside his bed.

And last but not least.......Well I believe you guessed what he uses her for. Oh, by the way, he says he would have voted for Bill Clinton again. Hell, he would have voted for Hilary!

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 08:25PM

Hey! Jackie Chan!

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 09:06PM

they are all ugly exept the one on HIS LEFt

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 10:23PM

rember what they say/bag for a hag.

Black_Trans_Am Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 10:25PM

It seriously is very nice wall panelling. VERY nice wall panelling!

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2005 11:23PM

With that kind of luck, would you believe, he is actually gay! So he is inviting all you hard-ons.

Silmarill Report This Comment
Date: March 19, 2005 06:23AM

One on his left.Very nice woman.

shaDEz Report This Comment
Date: March 27, 2005 01:08AM

damn got it goin on

MAILERDAEMON Report This Comment
Date: April 17, 2005 01:40PM

Hommingberger Gepardenforelle: [people.freenet.de]

Anon - not logged in Report This Comment
Date: April 22, 2025 04:01AM

I keep seeing these posts. The lack of men with enough money must really be biting in this age of 'cost of living crisis' (inflation caused by quantitive easing). I'm in Sydney at the moment and sat in a park overlooking a beach and the ocean. There's a walking path between beaches and the locals sun there on weekends (too many westies on the sand, who say things like 'youse' and take photos). All the men had tight t-shirts or showed off they spent more time at gym than earning. I was in a loose polo with a pocket (I won't buy a polo without one).

I must have looked like I had money:

A 30 year old yank with a face of warpaint tried twice to get my attention. A nineteen year old I've never seen in my life filmed me swearing to God she loved me into the phone (in my hearing), two eight year olds wearing pants their great grandmothers wore as underwear (the earth was cooler then) and a cross between a sports bra and bikini top (I don't know what it's called - I don't follow girls lines of communication) both took my photo, three teenagers in one direction (one definitely under age) and a twenty something in the opposite direction who had sunned with a man who had left took photos and texted, the older one hurried to walk in front of me when I was leaving and filmed me from in front, so I could see it.

I've never gone through that in my life.

- deliberate inflation, with or without quantitative easing;
- deliberate mass immigration;
- deliberate non-investment in relevant infrastructure, and;
- deliberately removing the moral backbone of society (for not believing evolution (you're just an animal, so government can act like a farmer), not supporting 'gay rights', or disarmament, or multi[religions], or globalisation or not getting mRNA (I'm proscribed on all counts. An idiot detached from science called it dissident genetics - dissent is not genetic). So marketing has more influence than ever - as evidenced by the fashions). So concepts of right from wrong now come from the leader (despotism) not from below (democracy), then the Liberal Party adopted marketing as government (Scott Morrison - it was a total failure of course, and evidence of a small and dumb echo chamber).

The last lesson at my school was: "You should judge what's promoted, by politicians or marketing". Isn't anyone told that any more?

During the Howard era my employer received a government contract in return for my sacking. The accountant left in disgust. Nothing is in writing so I can't prove it. So I don't have nearly as much money as I should have, and not enough.