quasi Report This Comment
Date: September 13, 2025 09:49AM

He was a Nick Fuentes follower, even farther right than Charlie.

Your latest posts sound like you're about ready to start shooting. Not impressing anyone with your ravings.

woberto Report This Comment
Date: September 14, 2025 09:19AM

I never heard of any of these people.
The thing I take away is a "normal" kid spends just one year at college/university and turns into a libtard that starts fucking a transmission man and then assassinates another man he disagrees with.

quasi Report This Comment
Date: September 14, 2025 09:34AM

The guy did one semester learning to be an electrician and dropped out. It's looking like he was a member of a group called groypers who are even farther right than Charlie Kirk who they thought was too soft for even talking to people on the left. But now we know where p_j got much of his "truth".

pro_junior Report This Comment
Date: September 15, 2025 08:01PM

"He was a Nick Fuentes follower, even farther right than Charlie"
Nonsense. As usual coming from quasi..

So you're saying that you believe that this guy shot Charlie Kirk because Charlie Kirk wasn't far right enough? Seriously?
You can't be this dumb.
And as for me sounding like I'm about to start shooting.. fuck off. I'm not a little bitch liberal that can't control his emotions.



hE wAs a grOYpeR

pro_junior Report This Comment
Date: September 17, 2025 04:45PM

Charlie Kirk assassin:
I was driven by leftist ideas.
I am a progressive.
I am a trans activist.
My family disagrees with my extreme leftist progressivism.
I hate MAGA.


quasi: assassin is MAGA.


are you able to admit that you were wrong?
I doubt it.

quasi Report This Comment
Date: September 18, 2025 10:53AM

Yes, I can admit I was wrong, when new information comes forth I don't automatically dismiss it, however he was raised in a right wing recently MAGA environment and when he realized how flawed it was and rebelled he resorted to a method he learned there (apparently very well) pick up a gun to "solve" a problem. At any rate, it doesn't change that Charlie became a victim of his own acceptable losses philosophy. Charlie also espoused bringing back public executions and allowing children to attend, should that be Tyler Robinson's fate? Would the gore discourage kids from committing murders or numb their senses to it the way video games are said to do? I also saw Charley saying Joe Biden should have been jailed and/or executed - such a good, Christian dude, huh?

PS - In the last couple of days there have been two murders of a domestic nature in the very red Lee County (got to honor those confederates, right) just south of where I live that is represented in congress by Byron Donalds who has been endorsed by Drump for the next governor of the state. Such a peaceful red haven where crime is reported every day. Maybe the National Guard should be deployed there, that'll fix it.

quasi Report This Comment
Date: September 19, 2025 12:37AM

Ironically, one of the charges against Robinson is committing a murder where children could view it while Kirk had proposed bringing back public executions that children could attend.

pro_junior Report This Comment
Date: September 19, 2025 05:14PM

unironically you don't recognize the difference between murder and capitol punishment...


from the left leaning site snopes.com...

What Kirk said
Kirk and his co-presenters Jack Posobiec, Tyler Bowyer and Blake Neff were discussing capital punishment in the context of whether they believed convicted pedophiles should receive the death penalty.

About 40 minutes into the show, the discussion about capital punishment moved on to whether it should be public and, if so, who should watch. Kirk said (time code 49:35), "It should be public, it should be quick, it should be televised."

He added (time code 49:53), "You could have like 'Brought to you by Coca Cola' and no, I'm not kidding. By the way, I would totally tune in to see some pedo get their head chopped off. Convicted by a jury of their peers. I'm talking about a real thing."

The discussion moved on to whether children should watch publicly broadcast executions. Kirk said (time code 50:17, our emphasis):

I think at a certain age it's an initiation. No, but hold on, you see, if all of a sudden, you look at some of these savages like in Indiana, there was this guy that went in and killed a pregnant woman and her three kids. And, you know what, I want to watch that execution, that'll make my day better. I want to see him on a public block and get him be publicly executed, and I think that would be justice. You think children should have … you should see … what is the age? At what age should you start to see public executions?

The show's co-hosts Bowyer and Neff each suggested 16- and 12-year-olds, respectively, as appropriate viewing ages. Kirk said (time code 51:13), "But it should also be taken in a holy way. Now, I don't mean holy in a bad way, I mean that, like, this is heavy."

Kirk did not say that executions should be mandatory viewing for children or give an opinion on what age he thought was appropriate to start. He did, however, express a belief that making executions public would deter future crimes. Kirk said (time-code 51:42):

Kirk: I want you to imagine everyday, all of a sudden they said: "And today, remember that awful five, you know, the guy that went and shot up a school?" Because, you know, left hates school shooters, and so do we and, but they focus on the gun, I think they're evil. So, you know, you take one of these school shooters and they say, "Today we're going to publicly execute this person." And they read off —

Posobiec: How about the Super Bowl?

Kirk: Yeah, or the shooters at the Super Bowl thing, and you read off what they did and you don't celebrate it, you know, you just say, "Look, this is what they did and if you do this, this will be your fate," ready, set, go. Boom, end of life. And say —

Kirk: As a question — Here's a question for anybody that might be, you know, not persuaded. Would crime go up or down?

Bowyer: It would go way down

Kirk: Down. So then why is this even a question?

quasi Report This Comment
Date: September 20, 2025 01:04AM

I absolutely recognize the difference between murder and capital punishment, not that I'm in favor of either one. Whether it be murder or execution, killing someone in front of children is killing someone in front of children and the idea of it being a crime in one instance and acceptable in another in the opinion of the murder victim is quite ironic.