Mach Report This Comment Date: December 08, 2011 06:13AM
Newt, just another corrupt scavenger insider..... an Official Ron Paul Ad
[
www.youtube.com]
quasi Report This Comment Date: December 08, 2011 11:03AM
Most people, at least those of a certain age, have heard the phrase, "If
you can't say something nice about someone then don't say anything at all."
I think part of the reason the media are virtually ignorring Ron Paul despite
his good numbers in the polls is that they've turned this phrase around to say,
"If you can't say anything bad about someone then don't say anything at
all." They are speechless in the face of an honest, decent man who has no
skeletons in his closet, does not flip flop, and always, always follows the U.S.
Constitution.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: December 08, 2011 02:07PM
But wait, there's more ....
When a candidate can't be bought off or manipulated into the old "go along
to get along" Good Ol Boy ideology the press will do everything possible to
downplay, overlook and marginalize them.
To every insider Ron Paul is a threat to everything they stand for because he
opposes it all and speaks all too plainly of how the same ol same ol in US
politics is EXACTLY the biggest part of the political problem known as US
Politics.
Ron Paul is the only candidate in the race honest and forthright enough to
deserve my support.
The real shame is the US electorate as a whole is so consumed with chowing down
on their Dancing with the Stars and Kim Kardashian Soma to even be aware enough
of what's going on in the candidate selection process, much less understand the
ideology behind the candidates to ever elect the right man for the job
Call it what you like but I'm all in favor of proposing a simple 3 question
political quiz before allowing anyone to vote. If a voter can't name the
current Prez, VP and Speaker of the House then they have no business even being
allowed to vote as they obviously are too politically unaware of the simple
chain of command in the presidency and constitutionally dictated line of
succession to have a clue of what's going on in the country

fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: December 08, 2011 02:28PM
that would eliminate 7% of the 10% that actually take the time to vote in this
country.

Mrkim Report This Comment Date: December 08, 2011 02:58PM
And having an actually informed electorate, no matter how small, elect the
leader of our country would be detrimental in what way?
When a president is elected on the quality of sound bite sized stump blurbs,
skin color or by a popularity contest instead of their grasp, stance and
position on real world issues .... we all lose.
If there's any doubt about that just look at what we have now and tell me again
how effective those tactics were at electing anything resembling a real leader
(headexplode)

fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: December 08, 2011 03:34PM
i never validated any of those accusations. merely stating fact
jgoins Report This Comment Date: December 09, 2011 11:58AM
Well I can name the president and vice president but the speaker escapes me.
Ron Paul will not make it because people know nothing about him and many voters
do not want to waste their vote by voting on someone who has no chance of
winning in their minds.