Mrkim Report This Comment Date: February 13, 2009 06:13AM
You're usin the wrong software, and uh, no .... please don't ask ...

woberto Report This Comment Date: February 13, 2009 07:59AM
As a printer I can tell you that it is instant gaol-time for making any kind of
reproduction of a bank note in Australia, the UK and USA. Makes me wonder how
they do it in the movies... I'm sure they use real money because they wouldn't
break the law, would they?
Mint Report This Comment Date: February 13, 2009 10:21AM
cant you just save it and print it with something else? like paintbrush? or
any image viewer?
FrostedApe Report This Comment Date: February 13, 2009 04:36PM
As a banker, I know that the best tool for detecting fake bills is... the human
fingers. Between the top-secret rag paper and the Intaglio printing process, US
bills have a very distinctive feel to them that your casual counterfeiter can't
duplicate. You hear it over, and over, "It just didn't feel right."
There are verifier pens, blacklights, and what-not, to find out if one is really
fake, but it's the feel that usually sets off the mental alarms in the first
place.
When I was a kid, you could run dollar bills through a copier and they would be
good enough to fool the change machine down at the car wash. Back then, and
8-year-old kid with $10 in stolen quarters in his pocket was practically Al
Capone.
Allegedly, of course. I never did anything like that.
Ahem.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: February 13, 2009 08:14PM
As anyone in the printing business can relate, it's been quite easy for many
years to duplicate the image on currency. The whole deal seen in movies about
"getting the plates" and all is totally bogus or at least has been now
for a good many years. Anyone with a camera, a way to develop the image and burn
a plate, and then slap it on a press and run it, which any Quick Copy joint
could do in no time, could easily dyplicate the image of the $$.
Like FA mentioned though, the subtrate (paper/cloth material money is printed
on) and also the qualities specific to the ink used to print currency are the
hard parts to duplicate. Since the US currency finally stepped up to the plate
and started using water marked stock in the process, this also added another
layer of protection to the currency that made it harder still to replicate.
No matter what though, if humans can create it, somehow or some way, other
humans can also duplicate it

woberto Report This Comment Date: February 13, 2009 10:24PM
There was a famous case over here in Oz 30-40 years ago.
US Dollars are the easiest to forge and some guy had millions printed in his
garage.
However he had not numbered them yet.
The numbering box & wheels are a specific size and font, so when he ordered
the gear, the feds delivered it.
Game over.
Only US banknotes use that specific number and the companies don't even make it
but are trained to refer inquiries to the cops.
Minimum 25 years in Australia. He should be out now though.
Onyma Report This Comment Date: February 14, 2009 01:00AM
The reason that the US is moving to coloured money now is that they caught some
group buying stacks of American 1's... bleaching the ink off them, then printing
100's since they all used the same paper and same colour ink.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: February 14, 2009 03:21AM
^^^^^^^ That scenario has been played out numerous times ^^^^^^^^^ It IS the
easiest way to get the right kinda paper

FrostedApe Report This Comment Date: February 14, 2009 06:23PM
The following are just my opinions, and I can't prove any of it, but...
I think "they" (US Treasury and Bureau of Engraving and Printing) have
to know that, no matter what they do to the bills, a sufficiently motivated,
equipped, and funded counterfeiter will eventually be able to duplicate the
bills. However, by making it as difficult as possible, they raise the cost
enough to make it uneconomical to do it in small quantities, and the more bills
that someone makes, the easier it becomes to track them to their source and shut
them down. Infiltrating a suitcase full of fake $100's into the cashflow stream
is one thing, but moving three semi-loads of them is an entirely different
matter.
I also believe that many countries around the world, probably including the US,
manufacture counterfeit currencies of foreign countries as a form of economic
warfare. A flood of counterfeit currency on the market diminishes the public's
faith in the real currency, lowering its value, since the whole concept of
modern paper currency is founded on nothing more than faith and trust in the
first place. I'm almost positive that I've read the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing already manufactures foreign currencies under contract anyway, so it
would seem to be a fairly trivial step to crank out a few extras for later use,
should the need for them ever arise.
As I said in the beginning, I can't prove any of this, so I might be completely
full of shit. Wouldn't be the first time.
woberto Report This Comment Date: February 14, 2009 11:54PM
Ca$h is a thing of the past, 15 years and it will be gone for good.
Personally I don't want that to happen but it's not up to me, or anyone outside
of the banks.
quasi Report This Comment Date: February 15, 2009 12:05AM
Cash is already a thing of the past for a lot of people these days - they don't
have any.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: February 15, 2009 05:04AM
you'll have a chip in your arm,
resistance is futile.;(
FrostedApe Report This Comment Date: February 15, 2009 07:54AM
When they force us all to get chipped, I'm going to tell everyone that mine is
in my ass-cheek, and then they'll have to run it through the scanner at Safeway
over and over and over. Then I say, "Oh, sorry, it's right here in my arm,
just like yours!" Then they have to use those sanitizer wipes on the whole
place. Because I'm a dick.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: February 15, 2009 11:33PM

"HAZMAT TO
SELF CHECKOUT NUMBER 18!!"

FrostedApe Report This Comment Date: February 16, 2009 12:31AM
Hell, by then all the food will be chipped, too, so you won't even have to
check out. Just put your shit in the cart and let the scanners at the door ring
it all up as you go out, and they scan your chip at the same time and debit your
bank account. The food will be so expensive, you won't be able to buy very much
of it at one time, anyway. You won't know until you get home that your bananas
cost you $22. They know you won't come back to get it corrected, because it
will cost you more to do it than what the difference will be.
woberto Report This Comment Date: February 16, 2009 06:30AM
They already do that at supermarkets, it just hasn't gone mainstream yet, too
pricey on the packaging.
Besides, humans will never be chipped, there is no point, our bodies already
provide enough unique markers to be scanned.
Frequent flyers with KLM have had retina scanning at check-in for almost ten
years now.
There are other biometric measures, it won't be long.