Anonymous Report This Comment Date: July 02, 2006 08:24PM
OMG
Gaijin Report This Comment Date: July 02, 2006 10:37PM
I am going to say shopped only for the reason I find it hard believe that the
fish could have survived with both bodies and no atrophy of either, and the line
where they join is pretty distinct which you would not anticipate to see in any
creature who had matured this way.
Just an opinion…
It is however unlikely, possible so I could be wrong.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: July 02, 2006 11:51PM
Judges...a ruling.
[
www.devilducky.com]
All your smurf are belong to smurf! (a funny short spoof of all your base are
belong to us)
For some reason this picture reminded me of the end of that. If you look closer;
the one on the left is smaller and more atrophied looking, and the other looks
dominant. However I think it was 2 seperate fish and shopped together also
because one looks like it is on it's side.
Gaijin Report This Comment Date: July 03, 2006 01:09AM
True the one on the left is smaller, but the throat whould obviously belong to
the one on the right therefor all nurishment for the smaller but healthy looking
body on the left would have had to come through whatever blood supply was
existing between the joined heads. Likely this would not be enough to support
the body on the left to the degree it appears to have matured.
brokntoad Report This Comment Date: July 03, 2006 05:04AM
the eyes have it... look there and tell me its not shopped.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: July 03, 2006 05:15AM
it's real boys and girls
brokntoad Report This Comment Date: July 03, 2006 05:19AM
and you verified it how?
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: July 03, 2006 05:30AM
prove it's fake then toad, other than your expert shop eye. pretty lame
attempt, reminds me of a beast arguement
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: July 03, 2006 08:15AM
Gives the term 'double pike' a whole new meaning.
These would be Chernobyl pike right?
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: July 03, 2006 09:11PM
So, it's real unless someone can prove it's fake?
Then the Loch Ness Monster must be just as real.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: July 03, 2006 10:54PM
sorry guys i've been real sick lately and my temper is pretty short.
i've seen this before, but i've also seen shopped ripoffs of the same
phenomenon. it could go either way. i can't say for sure, and am too sick to do
a good search.
i should have said please prove it fake if you can.
sorry again
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: July 07, 2006 02:15PM
I'm going to say it's real. I've looked at the pixels zoomed and there's
nothing fake looking. Check the textured concrete background, it's consistent
across the whole image. Finally the attitude of the bodies looks like they're
in an authentic slump. It'd be very hard to achieve all this convincingly.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: July 07, 2006 02:15PM
PS And if it was fake you'd try to make the lesser fish more like the other?
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: July 07, 2006 02:16PM
Definitely not one I'd be eating. Or anything else out of the same water....
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: July 08, 2006 02:41AM
hell 4 filets for the price of one minnow.....looks like a good deal to me