image stats
date added
previous votes
log in


indent register
indent recover

David Hooper 2014 Anatomy of a Great Deception

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars

Comments for: David Hooper 2014 Anatomy of a Great Deception
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: September 18, 2014 08:00AM

Oh please more conspiracy theories? The amount of people who would have to have knowledge would be so large that it would be impossible to keep secret. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 18/09/2014 08:02AM by jgoins.
The Truth Report This Comment
Date: September 18, 2014 12:52PM

Jgoins is your typical American moron who can't deal with reality so he just attacks the messenger. He's a coward and a disgusting POS.
BlahX3 Report This Comment
Date: September 18, 2014 01:26PM

I disagree. JG is an American not afraid to say what he thinks and I happen to agree with him on a lot of things except racism and thinking Fox news is fair and unbiased and his attitude about firearms and some other stuff but he has the freedom to be a dumbass onine like everyone else.
Mach Report This Comment
Date: September 19, 2014 02:23AM

Her's a good article.... even the 9/11 Commission dudes are saying they were duped!

Not the whole article, lots more here... plus lots of links within the article...

But 9/11 Commissioners Admit They Never Got the Full Story

The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into a real 9/11 investigation:

The Commission’s co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”

No wonder the Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 – Bob Graham - and 9/11 Commissioner and former Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a “permanent 9/11 commission” or a new 9/11 investigation to get to the bottom of it.

Some examples of obstruction of justice into the 9/11 investigation include:

An FBI informant hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000. Specifically, investigators for the Congressional Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House. As the New York Times notes:

Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence ….The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers.

The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Official Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 said that Soviet-style government “minders” obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses

The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements

The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times

As reported by ACLU, FireDogLake, RawStory and many others, declassified documents shows that Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001

Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 19/09/2014 02:25AM by Mach.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: September 19, 2014 08:19AM

I have no problem believing there might have been a cover up over prior knowledge of the hijackings. The exact scope of that knowledge could be as little as knowing there will be hijackings some unknown time in the future. I believe the government may have known there would be some who were going to hijack planes at some future date and the cover up was political in nature to protect their political asses. Remember that prior to 9/11 hijackings were only to fly to a different location and demand money or to free some comrades. Prior hijackings were never used for mass murder or terrorism.

What I have a problem with is the belief that demolition charges were placed in the building prior to 9/11. The amount of people and time that would be involved in planting those charges would be entirely to large to be kept secret.
pulse Report This Comment
Date: September 20, 2014 04:41AM

Hundreds, if not thousands of people have worked on the Apple Watch. Everybody knew they'd make one, but unlike the phone and most of their other gizmos there was never any specs, never any pics; nothing at all leaked about it.

Especially if you knew your life, and/or the life of your loved ones would likely be under threat if you were involved in such a thing (publicly talking about/discussing the WTC thing I mean).

Just saying..

(though I think it's total bullshit)

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 20/09/2014 04:43AM by pulse.
Mach Report This Comment
Date: September 20, 2014 05:21AM



jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 11, 2007 06:51AM

I have seen the demolition of many bulidings before and after 9/11. This building could have been any of them . I don't believe this one was one of the trade towers or any of the surrounding buildings. Consipracy theories will rot your brain. Bin Laden accepted responsibility for the attack of 9/11 in his own words on video tape for all to see. Next someone will say an alien space craft used a partical weapon to destroy the buildings.

jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 13, 2007 08:43AM

I don't deny that it looks like demolition but I do not believe it was one of the buildings around the trade towers or that it was even done at the same time. There's no way of knowing from the pic that it was even in New York. Just this pic alone proves absolutely nothing because it could have been easily faked.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: September 20, 2014 07:18AM

Everything I said still stands.