image stats
rating
3.25
votes
52
your vote
4
views
2560
uploader
Mrkim
comments
11
date added
2007-08-29
category
Misc
previous votes
Loading..
log in
Username:

Password


indent register
indent recover

No make up, nor need for it ... simple beauty

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
No make up, nor need for it ... simple beauty

Comments for: No make up, nor need for it ... simple beauty
tjbustem Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 08:31AM

Why would somebody rate this a 1? Is it that poor of a picture or is it they just don't like the poster?
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 08:35AM

just a peckerhead anon that gives everything a 1.

smiling
bouncing smiley he must think a 1 is bad for the poster, when in actuality all those 1's could be the reason i'm the #1 poster. keep 'em coming dipshit! smiling
bouncing smiley
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 10:28AM

Yeah....14 y/o's are beautiful things.
tjbustem Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 10:50AM

Unless you know this girl how do you know her age? Besides, you haven't been to the pool or beach lately have you? Most of those 14 year olds have less cotton on than you can find in an aspirin bottle. Don't blame the girls, blame the parents. eye popping
smiley
ORLANDO399 Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 12:12PM

Met Art posting chics under age,yeah right and im the pope.Looks to me like she's in her early twenties.
Mint Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 01:02PM

1 nothing special
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 02:17PM

I rate it a 1 also because it looks airbrushed (I know, photoshopped) to me. A lot of metart looks like artificial smoothing has been applied, don't get me wrong they do it better than a lot of other sites, that is to say with miore sublety.
Mrkim Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 03:29PM

I don't ever really care how anyone rates any of my pics, I mean really, like I'm gonna win a trip to Paris or somethin eye rolling
smiley

I do however take exception with 2 notions posted above.

1. Another very suspicious mention by an oddly "anonymous" poster about this chic bein 14 .... sounds like someone we all know is prone to such comments who otherwise posts under a username ... hmmmm, why doncha grind that ax some more dillweed the finger
smiley

2. If Met Art were prone to airbrushing dudn it seem as if the moles and freckles would be the 1st things they'd take out? And why in the hell would they even bother to airbrush a non nude pic at all?

In my experiences Met Art is one of the premier sites who actually seek to do all natural photography of ones just like this chic, who are simply beautiful without trying to "play" with their images at all. With likely a few thousand Met Art pics in my collection I've yet to have come across even one that seems as if it's been manipulated.

Then again, all things are possible, so as always, YMMV smiling
bouncing smiley

smoking
smiley
tjbustem Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 03:47PM

I still don't see how it rates a 1. someone took the time and effort to do it and it should rate more than some lame ass unairbrushed/photoshoped pic. thumbs
down
ORLANDO399 Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 04:12PM

Seem's like all the chic pics are getting ones..hmmm
SkullandChains Report This Comment
Date: August 29, 2007 04:42PM

Wasn't me who rated it with a 1. Not going to rate it either. grinning
smiley