madmex2000 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well its a damn good thing there was someone to
> stop the war machine. Its east to comply and be
> obeident to the military. HISTORY HAS ALSO SHOWN
> WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO SOCIETYS THAT CLOSE THERE
> EYES AND NOT RESIST MILITARY RULE.
Military rule and allowing the military to suceed at a task they're given
without decision making by NON military leaders are hardly the same thing. Tying
the militarys hands in deciding what can and can't be targets in all other areas
other than outright offensives/attacks upon non combatants is total BS.
The real tragedy is that these tactics by politicians make our military seem
ineffective in their ability to do the job they're given, which is far from the
reality that would occur if they were simply given a task and the freedom to get
it done without non military personnel making the calls.
My feelings are that if the same campaign being conducted in Iraq had been
carried out with the military makin all the calls it would have lasted a matter
of a few months and at a lot less risk to the soldiers involved.
The politicians in their efforts at waging war within the confines of political
correctness (a totally stupid and rediculous concept!) put our troops at far
greater risk than what their commanders own decisions would.
> YOU DONT NEED THE US GOVERMENT TO PROTECT YOU.THEY
> LIE!!!!!!!ASK ME I AM INJUN.
Hmmm .... so on 9-11 when the shit hit the fan I suppose the government
shouldn't have grounded all the other planes in the air in an attempt to stop
any further possible attacks that might have been in progress? The tightening
of airport/aircraft security measures mandated by the government in an attempt
to avert similar future attacks should not have occured either then huh ? Or
when foods are found to be contaminated with harmful bacteria the government
again should do nothing, right ?
I'm not much for governmental intervention in my life either, but there is a
definite need for the governments protection in the above mentioned and MANY
other instances.
So .... to make a blanket statement that we don't need their protection only
once points up your own lack of knowledge madnez and the roots of your heritage
really have no more relevence in such a discussion than do modern blacks
demanding retribution for the fact that their now long dead ancestors were
slaves.
If you are indeed a native Indian by heritage YOU have more rights than I as a
white native born American do. There is no such sanctuary in existance in the
US for MY race to be allowed free reign as any native Indian does, I can't get
ANY of the program benefits offered to the native Indians, nor am I awarded the
same minority status rights or tax exemption status rights you posess by nothing
more than the fact that you were ever born at all, so just get off that BS
