image stats
rating
2.61
votes
31
views
1256
uploader
aDCBeast
comments
38
date added
2007-02-14
category
Weird
previous votes
Loading..
log in
Username:

Password


indent register
indent recover

A lyin son of a bitch til the day he dies

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
A lyin son of a bitch til the day he dies

Comments for: A lyin son of a bitch til the day he dies
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 14, 2007 11:23PM

smiling
bouncing smiley THAT WAS A GOOD ONE! smiling
bouncing smiley
90130_ Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2007 03:57AM

Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?smiling
bouncing smiley
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2007 08:01AM

Come on Fossil don't stroke beast's ego. You know he can't recognize sarcasm.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2007 01:04PM

Man, it sure looks like Beast is obssesed in sucking Bush's cock or what ?
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2007 03:33PM

So beast is telling us he's gonna keep lying and carrying out his ego driven agenda.
quasi Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2007 05:09PM

Beast just keeps on projecting his own, tragic character flaws on to those he reviles. Guess it makes him feel better about his own sad, pathetic excuse for a life.
Aaron price Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2007 08:26PM

bush shouldnt waste time dropping dat big ass nuke over iran,ohh yeahh go to
fucking hell ayatollahs,mujaheddin,
madhatter Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2007 11:20PM

Beast- Did Bush refuse to hire you,or what?
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2007 11:49PM

smiling
bouncing smiley that's it!! hatter, you're a genius! smiling
bouncing smiley
shaDEz Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2007 03:05AM

time for somemore....


blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah
blah
blah blah
blah blah blah blah
blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah...
blah blah blah?
blah blah blah blah blah blah?
blah, blah blah blah!!!
blah!
blah blah blah blah blah...
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2007 09:54AM

Beast, looks like shaDez has a Blah key on his keyboard, put there for you only.
I agree with you beast, One day their blinders will be removed and they will see the truth. Hopefully, it won't be to late. Looks like Bush want to go after the Devil's triangle, with Iran next. If you ask me, I think he just like stirring up crap and leave the mess for someone else. Yes, Hilary is going to wipe Bush's ass, and you know what, she has more balls then he ever dreamed about having!
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2007 10:34AM

!Holly Shit, I always knew Hillary was a Transexual..
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2007 04:59PM

Hillary can form a line at my front door with her dumb-o-crat traitor pals and constituents and suck my hairy, sweaty balls.smiling
bouncing smiley
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2007 05:08PM

Bush sucks and Hillary (manipulator) is just as bad, check into Ron Paul, dig into his history and you won't be able to find a bunch of crap, he's not an ass kisser to whoever has big money, he sticks to Principles.

Get Real!
[video.google.com]
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2007 07:46PM

true, but unfortunately people like that cannot generate enough $ to run a winning campaign. sad smiley
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 17, 2007 06:37AM

You admitted there is a devil's triangle but you also stated that we should be too chicken shit to go after them. You and people like you would rather we just sit back and allow these people to gain nuclear weapons and use them against us before we do anything about it. I would rather not see a nuclear weapon used on our soil, but I can assure you it will happen if Iran is left unchecked on there current path.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 17, 2007 10:06AM

So basically what you are saying is, it is ok for us to have them but no one else. We were the only country to use the atomic bomb in WW2 so what makes you think we would not do it again? I know what Japan did at Pearl harbor, but don't you think something lesser could have been in store for us to use against them? Or do you think the technology we had and we just needed someone to try them out on and to use revenge as a justified means? I wonder if you even know that even the little things are faked anymore. Take the men that posed for the statue raising the flag during WW2 was staged simply for Morale boost, they were not even the original flag raisers . You can think what you want about other countries, but even small dogs run with the large ones!
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 17, 2007 05:10PM

I think the world learned just how deadly nuclear weapons are which is why they haven't been used since. If you think Iran, who have publicly called for our destruction, would not use nuclear weapons on us or our interests then you are living with blinders on. Iran has a large terrorist organization under it's control and it would be easy for them to give all kinds of nuclear weapons to the terrorists to use against us. Wheather it is a suitcase nuke or a dirty bomb, Iran would not hesitate to use it and Hezbulla(sp) against us. No they should never be allowed nuclear capability.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 17, 2007 05:45PM

jgoins ... chickenlittle

What about India or Pakistan ? 1.5 billion muslims there.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 17, 2007 05:52PM

The problem with conservative americans is that they think they are mandated by God to save the world.

This attitude is pervasive in many police officers, military, politicians, Presidents, old hags in churches, etc.

What comes with this attitude is a sense that they can do wrong to achieve the ends. Never mind that the ends they aim to achieve could be completely fucked up.

People with this psychology are dangerous to everyone around them and should never be in positions of power.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 18, 2007 08:11AM

Well India and Pakistan have never stated their desire to destroy the US, Iran has.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 18, 2007 03:09PM

they do however want to destroy each other
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 19, 2007 01:09AM

jgoin, here I go again, you simplify way to much, I wish the world was that simple, Iran may be a bunch of freaks but there is no country in the world that will nuke another country that easy, the main thing there is, they may hate America but as soon as we see even one nuclear warhead come from anywhere, that country will be wiped off the face of the earth and the main thing here is even those higher ups in shithole countries like Iran like their comfort-ability.

Do you ever see the terrorist leaders sending there kids out to kill themselves, NO, just the general populations kids. It's not a true hate, it's just power propaganda. People just like you don't get it, the Terrorist don't want to kill people, they want the reaction to the killing, what it does to people's brains, so, America is right where they want them to be. Sometimes instead of Re-action we should go with Pro-action.

If you want to get into the shit ask yourself why Bush was such a hardass with North Korea but now that he's going to start threatening Americans with Iran (FEAR) all of a sudden he's getting somewhere with North Korea, they are way closer to going bigtime Nuclear than Iran and that N. Korean leader has threatened lots of places in the world openly, it just goes to show, we pick the most profitable confrontation out of the barrel, real threats don't matter if they can't get that much out of it. They act and the people suffer!
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 19, 2007 01:47AM

a nuclear bomb will not be detonated by one country against another. rather detonated by some " lost " " stloen " "sold "

i thinks the odds are very low one will.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 19, 2007 02:57AM

The biggest Nuclear threat in the world right now as far as "on the side" is STILL Russia, it's a place your order under the table kinda thing.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 20, 2007 10:02AM

If allowed to proceed Iran will give some form of nuclear capability to terrorists to use against us. When a nuclear explosion happens in this country it will not be seen beforehand because it will not be done with a missle. It will be carried in.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 21, 2007 04:00AM

jgoins ... chickenlittle

Iran won't be able to nuke a 7-11 burrito for years to come.

Iran is playing the same game that North Korea just played. Show enough nuclear proficiency to make people take you seriously at the bargaining table.

Just wait until other nations play the same game. What will you say then when it's a white christian nation ?

You are a rube.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 21, 2007 07:06AM

I would say the same regardless of who is doing it. If they clearly call for our destruction and then attempt to gain the means to do it, I would call for their destruction before they can carry it out.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 21, 2007 10:48PM

jgoins ... chickenlittle

You really are dense. It's all a game. Talk. Just to get the countries with money to share it with the rest of the world. That's it.

If you believed the propaganda that's your fault for being so gullible.

The hardline Bush admin's press releases about Iran calling for the destruction of the US are merely statements telling Iran "We don't want to share our money with you". Get it ?

I bet you don't. You like many other americans would rather get wrapped up in the low level religious hatred. You show it with the crap about jihad.

You don't question what the US government says ? Why ? Don't you think they need to sucker the masses with BS to get them to fall behind their crap ?
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 21, 2007 10:56PM

wow i beleive now, it's been a bad dream...
SLAP!

hot smiley
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 22, 2007 08:54AM

Gee Fossil Digger, how could we have been so wrong all these years. It was always a dream, all those towel heads celebrating when the towers went down, their burning the American flag. I am so glad beast woke us up from this nightmare. Psych.

Beast, the hatred Iran has for the US did not develop when Bush became president, it has been there for decades upon decades. The current president of Iran has just brought it to the front with his speeches. We don't even have to believe Bush's translators to know what he said, all we have to do is go to Al Jazeera to get a translation. so Bush propaganda has nothing to do with it.
quasi Report This Comment
Date: February 22, 2007 06:10PM

Watch out, here comes the 150 years of mistreatment by the west defense. Yada, yada, yada. Blah, blah, blah. All the jihadists need is some cash and a big hug. Yuk, yuk, yuk.

Faaaaaarrt!

Glad I got that out of my system.

Too bad beast is still full of that same old shit.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 22, 2007 09:10PM

Quasi ... still a moron.

Funny that three retired US Generals that served in Iraq, all recall the history of British and then US aggression in Iraq for the last 150 years to explain the negative opinions Iraqis have of the US military in Iraq now.

Of course so do experienced intelligence analysts.

But what the fuck would they know?
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 23, 2007 08:23AM

3 generals out of over a thousand, not a very high margin. Was it not intelligence analysts who told us Iraq had weapons of mass destruction? I know you don't care but when Iran develops nuclear weapons they will use them on Israel and when that happens it will be too late to stop them from doing whatever they want.
quasi Report This Comment
Date: February 23, 2007 06:00PM

Wow! Three retired generals that are old enough to remember 150 years of history? Those must be some really old dudes. My mom can only remember half that and I thought she was old at eighty one. Holy shit!

And I can't decide if we're supposed to believe the intelligence analysts or not - you keep flip flopping, beast.

I'm really sorry but there's not a whole lot we can do about the past. All I know is that right now there are a lot of folks over there who feel their greatest achievment would be to kill as many people of differing opinions as they can even if it means their own death, and if Iran does develope nuclear weapons that is just to friggin close to those crazies who would be happy to use them. I don't really care what nationality, race, religion, or gender anyone is until they threaten to hurt others who are different than them and actually start doing it as they have. Do you need a bomb or something in your backyard before you get that?
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 25, 2007 08:10AM

Beast would get it even if he had a bomb in his backyard. Iran does control Hezbellah(sp?) which is a very large terrorist organization with members world wide. To allow Iran to have any nuclear capability would be the same as just giving Hezbellah nuclear material for their bombs. A dirty bomb can cause almost as much death and devistation as a complete nuclear bomb.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: March 20, 2007 10:24PM

jgoins ... chickenlittle

Now that you brought it up. No it was NOT intelligence analysts that said Saddam had WMDs. It was Dick Cheney.

I think the US should start placing demands on Israel and if Israel doesn't live up to them then stop giving money to Israel. Israel has overstepped its authority in the region and needs to be reigned in for the safety of the region.

two of the three were at the Patreus level. Top Commander in Iraq.

Hezbollah and Al Qaeda would not exist if muslim nations had nuclear weapons.


They would have an equal playing field with other nuclear countries and could act arrogantly and brashly as the US.

But they have been crippled by the british, french, and US for the last 150 years. Hence the pissed off sentiment they voice at the US.

quasi ... weak.

That was a fucking weak rebuttal about the 3 generals. Only a moron would what you did.

Iran couldn't light a fart with the knowledge they have right now. They are 10 to 15 years a way and they need expert help which they won't get.

India on the other hand has nuclear capabilities and they war with Pakistan all the time.

Where is your bitching about that?

TARDS


The only solution is to take the reason for their anger at the US away. Stop giving our money for oil to rich sheiks. Make those countries raise the standard of living for all of its people in oil nations and terrorism will fall accordingly.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: March 20, 2007 10:47PM

The only solution is to take the reason for their anger at the US away. Stop giving our money for oil to rich sheiks. Make those countries raise the standard of living for all of its people in oil nations and terrorism will fall accordingly

i can't agree more. thumbs
down