image stats
date added
previous votes
log in


indent register
indent recover

Oh yeah?

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
Oh yeah?

Comments for: Oh yeah?
duane Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 06:39AM

mrkim Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 07:58AM

Both the beauty and the pain of our freedom
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 08:54AM

I wish you political junkies would get your own blog. This stuff has gotten really boring. Saving your screed as a graphic doesn't make it an interesting image.
mrkim Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 10:27AM

So don't click on the obviously political images or comment on them. Is that concept really so hard to comprehend, or is bitchin about things you'll never likely change just your thing ?
BlahX3 Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 12:37PM

[email protected] ~ It's your fucking mouse, bitch. You click it, you see it.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 02:58PM

I fucked your mother
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 03:40PM

"I will defend your right to have suc a stupid idea".


Then why isn't the US military defending the CIA installed taliban and their wacked religious ideas?

The actor on the left is a CIA operative used to spread AMERICAN propaganda to scare americans into giving more of their freedoms away.

What kind of Americans give away their personal freedom? Someone who doesn't appreciate the freedom they possess.

Ungrateful bastards pissing on the graves of the founding fathers. Giving away freedoms THEY FOUGHT FOR to form this nation.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 05:17PM

[email protected]

My mom said you busted a nut in 1 minute.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 05:36PM

This will amuse all of you who express love for BushCheneyCo.:

*#2 Halliburton Charged with Selling Nuclear Technologies to Iran*


Global, August 5, 2005
Title: “Halliburton Secretly Doing Business With Key Member of Iran’s Nuclear Team”
Author: Jason Leopold

Faculty Evaluator: Catherine Nelson
Student Researchers: Kristine Medeiros and Pla Herr

According to journalist Jason Leopold, sources at former Cheney company Halliburton allege that, as recently as January of 2005, Halliburton sold key components for a nuclear reactor to an Iranian oil development company. Leopold says his Halliburton sources have intimate knowledge of the business dealings of both Halliburton and Oriental Oil Kish, one of Iran’s largest private oil companies.

Additionally, throughout 2004 and 2005, Halliburton worked closely with Cyrus Nasseri, the vice chairman of the board of directors of Iran-based Oriental Oil Kish, to develop oil projects in Iran. Nasseri is also a key member of Iran’s nuclear development team. Nasseri was interrogated by Iranian authorities in late July 2005 for allegedly providing Halliburton with Iran’s nuclear secrets. Iranian government officials charged Nasseri with accepting as much as $1 million in bribes from Halliburton for this information.

[...] []

Now tell me that the media is "liberal" ha!
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 05:38PM

Kinda makes the current "Iran must stop building nukes" issue a really silly one.. doesn't it!
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 05:41PM

This is rich:

" During a trip to the Middle East in March 1996, Vice President Dick Cheney told a group of mostly U.S. businessmen that Congress should ease sanctions in Iran and Libya to foster better relationships, a statement that, in hindsight, is completely hypocritical considering the Bush administration’s foreign policy.

* “Let me make a generalized statement about a trend I see in the U.S. Congress that I find disturbing, that applies not only with respect to the Iranian situation but a number of others as well,” Cheney said. “I think we Americans sometimes make mistakes . . . There seems to be an assumption that somehow we know what’s best for everybody else and that we are going to use our economic clout to get everybody else to live the way we would like.” *

Cheney was the chief executive of Halliburton Corporation at the time he uttered those words. "
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 05:42PM

And, golly, which US company is benefitting from lots of million and billion dollar contracts in Iraq... could it ... *Halliburton* ? Yes. YEs it could.

Funny that.
duane Report This Comment
Date: September 10, 2006 07:09PM

You guys are fucking Idiots.
mrkim Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 01:02AM

Come on duane, these cats took all the time to C&P stuff off the good ole interweb (or just fabricate it, who knows) so it HAS to be the truth, right !

BRB, I gotta go write a treatise on how Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny are real entities and post it on some nut bar site so these too can finally be known as THE TRUTH :>winking
duane Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 06:39AM

Nigel_Knowitall Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 07:22AM

Just to prove mrkim's point - or maybe not?
(Copied from the internet):

These are the scientific facts about Santa Claus.

1) No known species of reindeer can fly. BUT there are 300,000 species of living organisms yet to be classified, and while most of these are insects and germs, this does not COMPLETELY rule out flying reindeer which only Santa has ever seen.

2) There are 2 billion children (persons under 18) in the world. BUT since Santa doesn't (appear) to handle the Muslim, Hindu, Jewish and Buddhist cihldren, that reduces the workload to to 15% of the total - 378 million according to Population Reference Bureau. At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per household, that's 91.8 million homes. One presumes there's at least one good child in each.

3) Santa has 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seemes logical). This works out to 822.6 visits per second. This is to say that for each Christian household with good children, Santa has 1/1000th of a second to park, hop out of the sleigh, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left, get back up the chimney, get back into the sleigh and move on to the next house. Assuming that each of these 91.8 million stops are evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false but for the purposes of our calculations we will accept), we are now talking about .78 miles per household, a total trip of 75-1/2 million miles, not counting stops to do what most of us must do at least once every 31 hours, plus feeding and etc.

This means that Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, 3,000 times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest man- made vehicle on earth, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second - a conventional reindeer can run, tops, 15 miles per hour.

4) The payload on the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium-sized lego set (2 pounds), the sleigh is carrying 321,300 tons, not counting Santa, who is invariably described as overweight. On land, conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that "flying reindeer" (see point #1) could pull TEN TIMES the normal anount, we cannot do the job with eight, or even nine. We need 214,200 reindeer. This increases the payload - not even counting the weight of the sleigh - to 353,430 tons. Again, for comparison - this is four times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth.

5) 353,000 tons travelling at 650 miles per second creates enourmous air resistance - this will heat the reindeer up in the same fashion as spacecrafts re-entering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer will absorb 14.3 QUINTILLION joules of energy. Per second. Each. In short, they will burst into flame almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them, and create deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team will be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second. Santa, meanwhile, will be subjected to centrifugal forces 17,500.06 times greater than gravity. A 250-pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of his sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force.

In conclusion -

If Santa ever DID deliver presents on Christmas Eve, he's dead now.
kirsty_uk Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 07:52AM

yes your right this would heat the reindeer up see#5, thats why rudolph has a red nose
mrkim Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 08:00AM

Thanks for the clarification [email protected] ! I'll be sure to use that data in my upcoming treatise ;>winking

After finishing up with the aforementioned "factoid mongering" I plan to prove out how there is indeed a "man in the moon" and that yes indeed Virginia, he's made of cheese through the postings of such data on various sites!

This internet thingie is the greatest tool yet for "inventing" the truth !!

Any help on these topics buddy ? :>winking
Nigel_Knowitall Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 08:05AM

Hi mrkim!

I'll see if I can fit it in...I have to work too - occasionally... :0)
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 12:31PM

hey! Where'd all that anthrax come from?
What?! You mean it is the US Military "Ames" strain of weaponized anthrax? I thought biological weapons were illegal. Gosh, who could have gotten their hands on a US Military bio-weapon and then sent it to a bunch of media outlets and Democratic congress critters? Hmm....
zxz555 Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 03:41PM

I read the first 2 comments and then skipped to the end. I have discovered this to be a efficient way to read America / Hate America posts on 613 & not miss anything. I am velly interrigent.
HellBent Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 07:00PM

I *love* the vapid, surface denial of information without actually digging into it by duane and kimmy. Proves that small minds won't even attempt to expand themselves.

And this after duane had posted a google video (well-known for it's authoritative information) about some wanker doing a humor hit-piece of creationism vs. evolution ... and expecting it to be believed!

And to zxz555's comment: It's not about Love/Hate America...that's the simplistic dismissal. It's about looking ugly information in the face and taking it into account, as opposed to dismissing anything that doesn't fit into one's worldview.

The facts surrounding America's illegal invasion of Iraq are far more complicated than "bomb the ragheads!" and "they hate us, let's hate them!"

Time for people to grow up and learn that adults don't "hate" other people simply because someone hates them. Who is the bigger man? Inquiring minds want to know.
duane Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 11:38PM

Hell bent, this has been going on between me and Beast long before you showed up. I dont even try to argue with Beast anymore, he would write anything about Bush and has on several occations. Click on his name in the image stats box on any of his posted pictures and you will get an idea what he is all about. Hell bent plain and simple fuck off with your SMALL MIND! Most of the people on here realise that this is an agenda for Beast. Fucking Dweeb winking
mrkim Report This Comment
Date: September 11, 2006 11:55PM

HellBent, without personal indepth knowledge on any topic, any and all "facts" come under scrutiny as any type of plausible "truth". As the old saying goes "Believe nothing you hear, nothing you read, and only 1/2 of what you see". With these thoughts in mind, why should any reasonable minded person believe a single idea or supposed truth posted on the internet by some anonymous source with no idea of what their personal agenda might be ?

To me, anyone blindly putting stock and belief in anything posted on the net is the fool in this discussion.

My earlier pokes were light hearted comments meant to encourage thought about how easily data can be manipulated to suit what ever agenda one wants to espouse. Also they were intended to reveal (with comedy) how easily simple minds seeking validation for whatever ideology they envision as "true" can find exactly that.

BTW, the only people who have ever called me Kimmy are women who've enjoyed the pleasures of my Johnson. Are you sure you want to put yourself in that same company?
duane Report This Comment
Date: September 12, 2006 06:23AM

Squeel like a pig Hellbent! lmao
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: September 12, 2006 10:18AM

beastie argues with the people that semi-agree with him. he's a glutton for punishment. i think he was beaten as a child, when he grows up and gets his drivers license maybe he'll get a life away from his persecuting father
zxz555 Report This Comment
Date: September 12, 2006 11:16AM

Thanks for the insight Hellbent. Can you scan and post your invitation to speak at the UN for all of us to see. While we´re waiting I´ll sit and humbly meditate your patronising answer to my clever comment.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 12, 2006 03:07PM

duane + mrkim = puppets...... you are controlled for profit, the end. If you want to continue to live your lives as hoars go ahead, why don't you head over to Iraq, hang out for awhile and then you can find out if you like to risk your life for other peoples profit..
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: September 12, 2006 06:01PM

duane Report This Comment
Date: September 12, 2006 06:23PM

Hoars, is that like whores. Im not sure what you mean. I would assume that if you agree with Beast you are a puppet.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: September 12, 2006 07:19PM

lol, who has who's hand up the others ass?
duane Report This Comment
Date: September 12, 2006 09:24PM

OOH! OOH!, me first. Shit I never get to go first.
mrkim Report This Comment
Date: September 13, 2006 02:49AM

Ah ... fuck all the back bitin anonypussies. Get a handle and get a reply, otherwise you don't rate high enough on my scale to even reach my shoe laces :>/
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: September 29, 2006 02:55AM

mr kim your dick is short