image stats
rating
3.15
votes
33
views
1406
uploader
fossil_digger
comments
15
date added
2006-07-02
category
Weird
previous votes
Loading..
log in
Username:

Password


indent register
indent recover

a ruling please

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
a ruling please

Comments for: a ruling please
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: July 02, 2006 04:24PM

OMG
Gaijin Report This Comment
Date: July 02, 2006 06:37PM

I am going to say shopped only for the reason I find it hard believe that the fish could have survived with both bodies and no atrophy of either, and the line where they join is pretty distinct which you would not anticipate to see in any creature who had matured this way.

Just an opinion…

It is however unlikely, possible so I could be wrong.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: July 02, 2006 07:51PM

Judges...a ruling.

[www.devilducky.com]

All your smurf are belong to smurf! (a funny short spoof of all your base are belong to us)

For some reason this picture reminded me of the end of that. If you look closer; the one on the left is smaller and more atrophied looking, and the other looks dominant. However I think it was 2 seperate fish and shopped together also because one looks like it is on it's side.
Gaijin Report This Comment
Date: July 02, 2006 09:09PM

True the one on the left is smaller, but the throat whould obviously belong to the one on the right therefor all nurishment for the smaller but healthy looking body on the left would have had to come through whatever blood supply was existing between the joined heads. Likely this would not be enough to support the body on the left to the degree it appears to have matured.
brokntoad Report This Comment
Date: July 03, 2006 01:04AM

the eyes have it... look there and tell me its not shopped.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: July 03, 2006 01:15AM

it's real boys and girls
brokntoad Report This Comment
Date: July 03, 2006 01:19AM

and you verified it how?
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: July 03, 2006 01:30AM

prove it's fake then toad, other than your expert shop eye. pretty lame attempt, reminds me of a beast arguement
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: July 03, 2006 04:15AM

Gives the term 'double pike' a whole new meaning.
These would be Chernobyl pike right?
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: July 03, 2006 05:11PM

So, it's real unless someone can prove it's fake?
Then the Loch Ness Monster must be just as real.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: July 03, 2006 06:54PM

sorry guys i've been real sick lately and my temper is pretty short.

i've seen this before, but i've also seen shopped ripoffs of the same phenomenon. it could go either way. i can't say for sure, and am too sick to do a good search.
i should have said please prove it fake if you can.
sorry again
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: July 07, 2006 10:15AM

I'm going to say it's real. I've looked at the pixels zoomed and there's nothing fake looking. Check the textured concrete background, it's consistent across the whole image. Finally the attitude of the bodies looks like they're in an authentic slump. It'd be very hard to achieve all this convincingly.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: July 07, 2006 10:15AM

PS And if it was fake you'd try to make the lesser fish more like the other?
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: July 07, 2006 10:16AM

Definitely not one I'd be eating. Or anything else out of the same water....
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: July 07, 2006 10:41PM

hell 4 filets for the price of one minnow.....looks like a good deal to me