Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 07:06PM
It's Mr. Jonny 5!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 08:10PM
Aint nothin gonna bring victory in Iraq. We don't want to be there and they
don't want us there. It's that simple.
ganjaking Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 08:24PM
Iraq war was lost from the moment it started, You may have killed islamic
fanatics that wanted to do harm to america , but now you have created a whole
new breed of them , WITH a reason to kill americans.
Anthony Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 08:34PM
It's a T-1, first generation Terminator series, manufactured by a company
called Skynet.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 08:38PM
ganjaking, apparently that REASON is getting rid of a murdering dictator and
allowing the people to choose their own accountable government. Whatever you
think US motivations are, that is actually what is happening there. I guess this
is very un-Islamic. Islamic fanatics would like an all repressive nightmare
government where they execute teenage girls for having sex before marriage. i.e.
Iran
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 10:29PM
This thing will bring the death in Iraq.
...And hatred of the cowardly US that sends machines to kill without the loss of
soldiers.
No more honor in war, is there.
As to 208121: Yes, getting rid of Saddam was a good thing. However since the
US *supported* him previously, when it was convenient to us, and helped him gas
the Kurds (etc.) it's rather hypocritical to try to take the moral high ground
now and say we invaded Iraq to do the Iraqis a service. Follow the money, my
friend. Democracy is not lucrative.
However, you are also right that Islamics tend to choose religious govt's that
murder women for have premarital sex. And gays, and whomever doesn't follow
their Code.
But military invasion is not going to change their minds that "our
way" (of immorality and online porn?) is better than their system. Go
check out the Spengler debates on [
atimes.com] , in the forums.
However however, are we going to bring "democracy" to Iraq? Or are we
going to bring "capitalism" to Iraq? I think it's the latter, not the
former.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 10:50PM
I think we Americans should plot to make all the muslims fight each other just
like they have been for thousands of years,but let's pull out first/all we have
to do is tell the opposing religious finatics how come the other side always has
more than you do & vice versa works every time,try it on blacks(I've seen
them go at it,funny,funny,funny)
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 11:24PM
LOL, cowardly US huh? Yet another armchair political opinionist. I would like
to see how brave you would be when any pop can lying on the ground can blow up
in your face. this thing's purpose is very likely to examine potential road
side bombs and destroy them. Talk about cowardly acts, how brave are those
"Islamic jihadist lions" that remotely detonate road side bombs. They
are too scared to confront the US soldiers. Or the jihadists that kidnap and
execute women who have volunteered to help humanitarian projects in Iraq. And
you have interesting logic there about how the US has no moral right to remove a
murdering dictator because they once help financed his war against Iran. Every
anti-American jumps on this fact. So-fukn what??? At the time Iran was the
greater evil and Iraq was best placed to contain it. It was the right call at
the time. MANY nations were involved in supporting Iraq, not just the US. I
guess it shouldn't matter that he later invaded a sovereign nation called Kuwait
and executed thousands. I've read some stories about that invasion that were
horrifying. Who cares that he practiced genocide on ethnic minorities. No, the
world should just sit blindly by and watch it happen. Just like the Europeans
did with Hitler when he broke the treaty of Versailles and re-armed. Europeans
will always be appeasers at the expense of their principles. And just how
exactly did the US help him do this to the Kurds???? Yet another unsubstantiated
rumour that you typical anti-american jump on. Who needs facts huh? Even when
the US ostensibly is supporting something the west values such as freedom and
democracy, people still say "oh yeah, I bet there some financial reason
behind it, there HAS to be. We will find this reason even if there are no facts
to support it"
yamon Report This Comment Date: January 25, 2005 11:46PM
For anyone that thinks Iraq hates us: [
yamonsvotal.com]
ganjaking Report This Comment Date: January 26, 2005 01:15AM
Iraq war is about money and oil. Freedom? How about giving the iraqis the right
to live however they damn well please? Now I think that Iraq is safer after the
war , but is the U.S.A.? NO. How about the rest of the countries in Africa ,
South East asia, Cuba and etc.. with oppressive goverments, how come the US has
not drawn up the invasion plan to free the rest of the politically imprisoned
and suffering people? You know why ,because they dont have shit for them in
return. War for oil. Iraq is a mistake.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 26, 2005 02:23AM
OK, gabjaking, you must be a economics genius or something, the way you figure
out the real motivations of international diplomacy. Please bestow on us a mere
nugget of your amazing insight: how exactly does the US get the "money and
oil" that they couldn't get off the free market before invading Iraq?
Surely you aren't suggesting that the US is secretly building a pipeline to New
Jersey and sucking Iraq dry for free are you. No, you wouldn't subscribe to such
a crude idea as that. You must know some more subtle, yet ingenious method. Yes,
Iraq had a UN embargo before the invasion and could only export oil for money
to be used for food and medicine. The thing is, the U.S. was the major impetus
behind that resolution, and it was the Europeans that were sneakily making huge
profits by circumventing it (documents have been found in Iraq substantiating
this). So the argument that the invasion was to allow Iraq to export oil
doesn't seem reasonable. So far, the only money transfers I have heard about are
from the US congress that keeps passing huge expenditure bills to pay for Iraqi
infrastructure improvements, like powerplants and sewage plants that were
neglected for decades so that Saddam could pay for his massive military. (that
the Russians and French were all to happy to sell him). So by all means, tell me
how the US is making huge money from this invasion?
As to your question about the rest of the oppressed world: well the US did stop
the government in Serbia and help put Slobodan Milosevic on trial for genocide
of, oh my god, Muslims! In Somalia, they sent troops so that food aid would get
through to the starving people. Well, pretty much the entire population of
Mogadishu attacked them and killed something like 15 soldiers, so they left.
With limited resources, I don't think the US is going to send 10 divisions to
every hot spot in the world. That should be the responsibility of a unified
United Nations that is resolved to fight tyranny. With conflicting self
interests though that is never going to happen. For example, both France and
Russia PROFITED hugely from Saddams regime, and therefore did not want their
cushy deals to be disrupted.
duuuuuuuuuuuuude Report This Comment Date: January 26, 2005 03:45AM
nothing can bring true victory unless we destroy the place. it's illogical, but
true.
quote from 16852 "I don't think the US is going to send 10 divisions to
every hot spot in the world. That should be the responsibility of a unified
United Nations that is resolved to fight tyranny" the U.N. has no real
power. all they can do is pass resolutions "strongly urging" military
action. they can't force anyone to do anything
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 26, 2005 10:24AM
16852: "this thing's purpose is very likely to examine potential road side
bombs and destroy them. Talk about cowardly acts, how brave are those
"Islamic jihadist lions" that remotely detonate road side bombs. They
are too scared to confront the US soldiers"
your reply is 100% bovine excrement.
first of all you don't examine roads with a machine gun. Second, it's a tough
coward race, you bomb them with planes and cruise missiles, they have the right
to respond as they want.
Third, i'll be scared as shit too if i see a US marine with all new weapons n
technology approaching me when all i can have to defend myself are knives and
stones, or if i'm real lucky, a 30 years old kalashnikov.
Asshole
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 26, 2005 02:20PM
A comment on the picture now....doesn't look very impressive to me. What good
is a 30 million dollar weapon that some kid can just kick over and make useless?
Bob Report This Comment Date: January 26, 2005 03:23PM
What's the battery life like on this thing?
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 26, 2005 05:40PM
To poster who signed his post as "Asshole": Hmmm, "100% bovine
excrement" huh. What a witty, intelligent comeback. I feel totally humbled,
now that I have witnessed true excellence in the art of debate. You have
systematically disected every argument I presented with incisive, undeniable
truth and unambiguous use of the English language.
FIrst, I'm not exactly sure what you mean with your statement "you don't
examine roads with a machine gun". No, the machinegun is not used to
examine anything. I thought that was obvious. It is the cameras that would do
the examining. The machinegun would be used to disable or destroy the object of
interest.
Second, I'll take your last two statements as actually having the same meaning.
When you say "all I can have to defend myself...", I assume that you
are implying that the average Iraqi is being attacked by US soldiers, and that
those attacks are unjustified. However, those that are being attacked by the
soldiers are basically criminals by every accepted definition of the word, not
average Iraqis. They are a group that are indiscriminately killing hundreds of
innocent Iraqis. They are a group that is trying to sieze power disproportionate
to their public support by using terror and fear. Basically, exactly the same
characteristics of the Baathist regime or an Islamic fundamentalist regime. They
are sabatoging reconstruction projects in order to prevent any evidence that the
US is actually helping the average Iraqi. I am sure that if the average Iraqi is
in fact reasonable and has some foresight beyond that what is provided by
religious fervor, they do not want this group to seize power. Therefore I do not
accept the argument that the US is unjustifiably attacking anybody.
And no, this group is not the poorly equipped common people that you are trying
to characterize them as. They are well financed terror group and they have more
rocket propelled grenades and Kalshnikovs and explosives than they know what to
do with.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: January 26, 2005 09:08PM
info about robot: [
story.news.yahoo.com]
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: February 08, 2005 01:40AM
NUKE THE FREAKIN' IRAQUIS
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: April 10, 2005 10:09PM
nuke ur mother
MAILERDAEMON Report This Comment Date: April 17, 2005 01:54PM
Hommingberger Gepardenforelle: [
atlas.at.funpic.de]
