Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 09:49PM
How do you know it wasn't an Iraqi insurgent suicide bomber or roadside
bomb?????
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 09:52PM
Because it happened on the first day of US bombing.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 10:53PM
things like this are SO speculative and circumstantial... and then it whips
others into a frenzy because they take it as fact... despite the goodness of
the internet, this is one of the dangers... anybody can post anything, and
further "spin" subject matter to a particular purpose or political
view... not a judgment, just the way information is "shared" these
days...
mexican Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 11:30PM
fucking americans... any way...if this was made by "an Iraqi insurgent
suicide bomber" its USA fault!!!! you morron!!! way you dont leave the
fuking contry alone... the only thing that you care is the oil!!!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 11:38PM
What do you use to get around in, Pedro? An old burro and cart?
gladiatrrr3000 Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 01:03AM
Yes, there's no definete proof this was by an American bomb. She could have
gotten a cold. Maybe that's just a rash. Who knows?
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 01:20AM
Why doesn't anyone post pictures of the thousands upon thousands of kurdish
women and children that were slaughtered by Saddam's henchmen? Or pictures of
young Kuwaiti men who were dissapeared forever when Saddam's intelligence
service took them away from their families after the brutal invasion of Kuwait?
Or the Iraqi children who were blown to pieces by "Islamic freedom
fighters" while lining up for candy? Or the Iraqi men and women who were
blown up while shopping at the market? Simple, because some people have a very
narrow politically motivated focus and ignore anything that doesn't support
their agenda. On the other hand they flaunt to death anything that supports
their beliefs. I have come to the conclusion that people in general are
irrational, sentimental assholes who are in no way objective observers of the
real world. They let their bias twist and distort their view of the world.
Interesting but childish logic that because the Americans invaded Iraq they are
responsible for all the disgusting things the criminals are doing over there.
Yes they islamic insurgents are criminals because the overwhelming majority of
Iraqis view them that way and do not support their actions. These
"insurgents" cleary represent all that the average Iraqi and rational
people all over the world view as criminal. I would think there is a very good
possibility that a very large mob of average Iraqis would love to savagely beat
anyone living in their safe democracy that feels they have the right to judge
what is happening on the streets of Iraq today.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 01:26AM
One of the few things I have read here that make any sense.....how come the
bleeding heart that posted the pic of the child have to be balanced posted pics
of the children's prisons in Saddam's Iraq? Cuz it would have not registered in
that simpleton's childlike mind. How many children were brutalized by Saddam?
Huh? You don't care? Didn't think so.
madmex Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 02:10AM
SADDAM was bad .SO what! Let him kill them all for i fukn care. I am a liberal
and thats my stance. Why do you care about what Saddam did. Only one that had a
problem with him was people who wanted control overhis oil. More people die in
Afraica, why aint we helping them. if your a Republican then Jesus and Pals are
your best supporters. When did you become so weak........Some Rockn Roller you
are.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 03:09AM
Fucking Mexicans, dont seem to know what the hell is going on in their own
backyard, never mind the world, maybe we should bomb them, ( kidding ) but when
I see such dumbass comments like from mexican1685, you gotta wonder, well
actually you dont, he's an asshole
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 04:46AM
mexico is a shithole and we have a mexican criticizeing the U.S.? when
millions of mexicans swarm here every year? how many americans slip across the
border to work and live in mexico? how can any mexican with half a fucking
brain say america is fucked up. stupid mexican. stay there, ok?
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 05:28AM
Anonymous@67139
There was no such thing as a child's prison under Saddam. Saddam did not
brutalize children. He kept adults that threatened his regime in prison. That
way the US authorities aided him in doing.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 05:36AM
I think mexican1685 aught to wake up and smell the coffee, instead of smoking
his loco weed. If he thinks the US is so bad and we should get out of Iraq,
maybe we should also get out of Mexico and sent ALL the illegal Mexicans back,
sort of an ethnic clensing, then see what happens to him and his country. They
buy propane from us at 18cents a gallon and we have to pay $30 for a lousy 5
gallon tank. Who is getting the margin over there? What would they do for
jobs?, make adobe bricks? The only reason they have not been overrun by the
communist element is because they are so close to the US. Otherwize they would
be rounded up and slaughtered off like Castro did the insurgents when he took
over Cuba. He really sounds like one of those bleeding heart liberals that
smoked so much weed his brain can only think that he is the only one with a lick
of sense. I have a good suggestion, Mr. Mexican1685, go over to Syria or
Jourdan and live there, strap one of those bombs on your goofy ass and go out
into town and show those Syrians and/or Jourdanians just how important you
really are. You seem to know all about the reasons for all this foolishness, go
do something about it. In fact, I can bet you that we could get a collection up
to finance your adventure. If you are game, get back to us in this column and
show us where the bear shits in the woods!!!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 05:49AM
You kids don't see the underlying point: It's not "republican" or
"democrat"... it's fucking capitalism. It is an economic system based
on constant exploitation.
It needs new feeding grounds, always. Sometimes we can stall it, by giving it
the "digital market" or new products that people are fool enough to
buy, but other times it will infect new parts of the globe in order to make more
money.
THAT's the hand that is guiding policy in Iraq.. money.
The "Market" needs money, and Iraq is the key to breaking open the
very tightly controlled Middle Eastern economies. Iraq was out and out
command-economy under Saddam. Saudi Arabia is state-controlled too. Iran? Same
thing.
American corporations want arab money.
All the bullshit about "us" and "them" is largely invented
(and manipulated) into keeping the rest of us divided.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 06:00AM
Why don't they show pictures of Americans liberated by brown eyed people
wearing bombs??? Only because the liberals and Democrats in America want the
America to loose. They have lost the last two elections and they are slowly
decaying from the inside, what a bunch of loosers. 86 percent of Americans
believe in God, why do we have to listen to a lousy 14 percent. Democrats and
the French have a lot in common, LOOSERS!!
When is the last time either of you won a war? Another point, You cannot
negotiate freedom. All wars do not end up with the good guys winning, but with
the right tools and the right reasons, the good guys will win. If opression was
so popular, why don't all you liberals go over to Ruanda? If opression was so
popular why did the USSR fold?
It is very unfortunate that children should die in war or in peace. When they
die in war, usually it is because of the decisions of an opressive government
trying to hang on or to establish itself. I do not see why people in the
freedom of America think it is right and proper for the opressive insurgents of
the mideast to kill everyone that does not believe like they do. If you think
opression is good, I pity your family. I have seen opressive parents die in old
age and the family cheers and throws a party in celebration of their death. You
want to stop the war? Tell the insurgents to stop bombing and killing and get a
job in a cheese factory or something and let the country rebuild. Simple as
that.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 06:18AM
Well Anonymous@1485, I have a degree in commerce, and I can definitely say you
have no clue what you are talking about. You are one of the many people that
"think" you know a whole lot by watching TV or something, but
apparently have a very limited knowledge of things like economic theory. With
human nature what it is, ignorance always leads to conspiracy theories and
"guessing" based on emotional gut feeling on very complex issues. The
entire "war for Oil" theory is a classic example. The ignorant simply
grasp at the first thing that they feel is going on without ANY substantiation.
It is amazing how strongly these people stand by their convictions when they
must know they don't have a thorough understanding of the issue. Money isn't
the evil you make it out to be. It simply represents a person creating something
valuable. Capitalism needs people to create things in order to have the things
we take for granted. Otherwise we would still be living in caves. Under
capitalism, every free person is allowed to create whatever wealth they are
capable of, and every free person is allowed to trade their wealth for whatever
they want. Their trades represent an economic vote and therefore capitalism is
basically an extension of democracy, in that every single person is free to have
their say on the economy through their work and purchasing behavior. Essentially
this is a classic argument of individual freedom and state control of the
individual. Certain personality types will polarize and gravitate towards both
positions. Some personality types feel a need for authoritarian control over
everything and others value freedom.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 06:49AM
Anonymous@95205
Anonymous@1485's conclusion is on point even if he didn't explain it well.
American corporations want arab money.
fuk_bush Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 06:50AM
r u stupid yankee doodle fucks suggesting that american bombs dont kill
children, do u believe your smart bombs know the differance???u dummies still
believe 911 was a terrorist attack ,it was the biggest insurance fraud in
history ,building 7 sez it all .....america u suck the biggest cocks of all!!!!
ninepointfiver Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 06:52AM
ok......Thank you dick head, that was from a God - forbid.....INFIDEL!!!!!
ninepointfiver Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 08:58AM
Don't use my name "79212". I can place my own thoughts w/o your
input!
ninepointfiver Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 09:00AM
WTF!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 04:14PM
aDCBeast@11515, it is so simple to just say "American corporations want
Arab money" isn't it? It is more difficult to actually back the statement
up though. The more education one gets in such matters, the more one starts to
realize that issues like these cannot be reduced down to black and white like
you are doing. The issues are enormously complex and the average person just
cannot fathom it, and therefore compensates by filling in their huge gaps of
knowledge with conjecture completely determined by their political and
philosophical leanings. First of all, from a geopolitical strategy point of
view, it is very prudent for our leaders to encourage those that control a VITAL
world resource to trade it for fair market value. There is NOTHING MALEVOLENT
about that. If they did not do so they would be simply be incompetent and remiss
in their duties to protect and improve our society. (thank god people like you
are not making the big decisions for our societies) Demanding that someone trade
at fair market value is not stealing. If so, then I guess the western world has
been stealing fairly priced Toyotas from Japan for far too long. Of course the
difference between Toyotas and oil is that oil is a scarce non-renewable
resource that is the backbone behind a modern civilization. Most people do not
understand how incredibly important energy is to their own standard of living.
It goes WAY beyond making our cars move. Modern industry is the largest consumer
of energy. The modern world cannot afford to allow extremist sociopathic tyrants
to control and blackmail society with this vital resource. So I see nothing
wrong with encouraging moderate, reasonable, and rational regimes in oil
producing regions, the ends being to obtain oil for FAIR MARKET VALUE.
mexican Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 04:30PM
"I GOD WE TRUST".- USA
hahaha yeah of course... its incredible how blind are all the fucking
"americans".... i dont know why im saying "americans"
because the word "americans" is for all the peoble of north, south and
the center of the continent "america". not just US....
"Anonymous@6029" if all the illegal Mexicans are returned to our
contry. your country will be fucked up!... the mexican people have a very
important role in your economy... you shoud read before you "talk
shit"... and you shoud START thinking... "way all the world hate your
country?"... thats becuse you do shit arround the world... you do some good
stuff too... but mostly you do shit!!!
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 04:56PM
Anonymous@208121
LOL!
A president that uses the military in an illegal occupation and takeover of a
country to line the pockets of his daddy's friends is wrong.
The true "nice going dumbass" will come in a few years when Iraq
breaks out into civil war because Iran wants to Annex southern Iraq. And the US
will be powerless because the Russians and Chinese will be defending Iran.
American corporations want arab money. Thank you for simplifying the more
complex statements I made earlier. Rush Limbaugh thinking is lame.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 05:20PM
"On August 26, 2005, 12:28 am aDCBeast@11515 said :
Anonymous@67139
There was no such thing as a child's prison under Saddam. Saddam did not
brutalize children. He kept adults that threatened his regime in prison. That
way the US authorities aided him in doing."
You are more ignorant that I ever supposed. There WERE children's prisons in
Iraq.
Have you ever heard of Google? Next time you want to be an ignorant jackass,
try Google first.
[
www.command-post.org]
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 05:46PM
Anonymous@95205 said:
- "Capitalism needs people to create things in order to have the things we
take for granted. Otherwise we would still be living in caves. Under capitalism,
every free person is allowed to create whatever wealth they are capable of, and
every free person is allowed to trade their wealth for whatever they want. Their
trades represent an economic vote and therefore capitalism is basically an
extension of democracy, in that every single person is free to have their say on
the economy through their work and purchasing behavior. Essentially this is a
classic argument of individual freedom and state control of the individual.
Certain personality types will polarize and gravitate towards both positions.
Some personality types feel a need for authoritarian control over everything and
others value freedom."
This is all very nice and ideological, but irrelevant. The fact is that the
underlying mechanism of a positive-interest exchange medium requires that some
people will lose out.
Basically, the economic system we have inherited (from the midieval age of
expansion and exploration) forces either bankruptcy, or requires slave-type
labor.
This is because interest money has to come from somewhere. Some have the power
to make interest payments work for them, and their investments gain them extra
capital (that they didn't actually work for, btw), while other people are on the
ass-ream end of interest payments.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 06:13PM
Let me offer a simplistic example:
10 people in a tiny village barter. Chickens for beans, knitting for pots, etc.
But barter is limited, each person has to have what the other person wants.
Walks into town an interesting person. He says: "Here, let me help. Each
of you take 10 of these 'coins', and they will allow you to trade with each
other for anything you desire."
This is great, the 10 villagers can now simply 'buy' whatever they want, and the
method of exchange is greatly enhanced.
The stranger says, "I will return in one year, and I want each of you to
bring me 11 coins. The 11th coins is a token of appreciation for the
technological improvement I have made in your lives."
In one year's time, the stranger returns.
Where does the 11th coin each person must produce come from?
This is the mechanism of positive-interest. Some people get screwed. This is
the essence of capitalism.
I'll bet your Commerce degree never touched on that fundamental problem.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 07:44PM
Anonymous@67139
"It appeared to be" appeared is someone's opinion. Not fact.
LOL !!!!!
Propaganda. Like I said. There was NEVER a children's prison under Saddam.
Maybe you shouldn't you google any more. It's proving you can't figure out what
is fact or fiction.
usa_sucks Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 08:08PM
ok... let me under stand...
""You are more ignorant that I ever supposed. There WERE children's
prisons in Iraq.
Have you ever heard of Google? Next time you want to be an ignorant jackass, try
Google first.""
if i found something in google it has to be true??? if in the news said
something it has to be true?? because in the news and in google, they said that
the USA are murdering peopple around the world... why you dont try...
www.google.es or www.google.uk, or www.google.com.ar, or www.google.com.mx....
just see the news around the world you fucking idiot!!!!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 08:16PM
aDCBeast, I think you are nitpicking to prop up a very dubious viewpoint and
you are missing the point. Saddam was without question a sociopathic Stalin-type
brutal dictator. Without question, he had put to death many good people,
including children. Again, people like you only point out the little evidence
that supports your theories and ignore the overwhelming majority of evidence
that goes against your theories. In stastics terms, this would be called making
judgements based on "outliers" while ignoring the modal or most
frequent data. Obviously this will lead to extremely flawed determinations. This
is typical of people who have an agenda and are determined to see what they want
to see in the world. This can hardly be called an objective viewpoint. Just like
people who point out the rare events of accidental bombing deaths while ignoring
the thousands of lives saved by the elimination of a sociopathic regime.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 11:32PM
Anonymous@208121
That simply isn't true. Or most accurately, Saddam was not as bad as the US
propaganda machine made him out to be. Saddam was always at the mercy of the US.
Meaning he could be taken from power in a moments notice.
You have to remember. If we blame Saddam for keeping the kurds and shia in line
by means of torture (Saddam did live mostly on myth and tales to prop him up)
that you would be blaming him for doing the the US government wanted and
instructed him to do.
That should not be a revelation. You do know that the shia are the same strand
of islam as Iran. And the clerics that Iraqi shia listen to are Iranian. Saddam
stabilized the region be not allowing shia (Iraqi and Iranian) to control 50% of
the worlds oil supply.
That is why allowing the shia to control Iraq now is a blunder on Bush's part.
The shia have no reason to share with sunnis. Sunnis remember all too well how
shia tortured them earlier this century.
Muslim clerics will pressure the shia to be annexed to Iran very soon. Hence a
civil war. And possibly US intervention on behalf of the "insurgents"
we are currently fighting.
ninepointfiver Report This Comment Date: August 27, 2005 07:54AM
Hey, I "Googled" "aDCBeast", and all I got was a return
that said "traitor". Wow, go figure. I want to know where you live you
piece of shit, speak up!!!!!!!!!!
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 27, 2005 05:25PM
ninepointfiver@79212
Wow.. did you think of that all by yourself ?
my office:
935 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
Come on down.
McSugarman Report This Comment Date: September 05, 2005 10:21PM
CRIPPLE FIGHT!
slslea Report This Comment Date: September 10, 2005 04:18AM
Kick his ass dcbeast. O yeah that was proboley a suicide bomber that hurt that
poor little girl.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: October 28, 2005 09:39AM
slslea
No. She was killed in one of the first days of the american invasion of Iraq.
