While it's a possibility he intended to make up some blunts outta the cigars, that's still an assumption, and one made without any factual basis, which means logic dictates it is then a baseless claim unless you have personal 1st hand knowledge to the contrary, which is highly doubtful.

To further extrapolate that because he wanted a carton of the cigars is evidence he was then a drug dealer is really stretchin shit waaaaay past the bounds of reasonability, and in fact, just points to how little you know about drug usage and culture.

To sum up dingo, you have stated a position predicated on a baseless claim, then trumped that with statements showing a total lack of understanding of what you're discussing. Like the saying goes, it's better to keep silent and appear wise than to display your thoughts openly and prove yourself otherwise