The point seems to be that when you display a sign that states "Gun Free Zone" you might just as well place a substatement that says "Another Fine State Sponsored Shooting Gallery" beneath it.

When you implement a "Gun Free Zone: you've done 3 very disturbing things: 1. you've taken away every lawful citizens right to be armed for the protection of themselves and others 2. you've empowered the police/nanny state mentality and 3. you've placed in jeopardy every person who enters such a zone from the actions of any individual who bears the intent to do harm to others with a firearm. Honestly, does anyone really believe such a sign stops anyone intent on doing harm to others?

Anyone who thinks signs like this deter anyone from doing harm to others, let me introduce you to another cuppla similar fantasies .... Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.

If schools (and add to that list now, theaters) are so well protected by designations as "Gun Free Zones" and the gun carrying cops, perhaps we should ask the families of victims of mass shootings at these areas how well that worked in protecting their loved ones.

Better yet, how about asking some of the right to carry permit owning teachers and theater patrons who had to sit idly by and watch as others around them were injured and killed because they chose to obey the inane "Gun Free Zone" policies, making themseleves and those around them nothing more than moving targets in a government sanctioned shooting gallery