Had you chosen to have read the attached articles GAK you might have noticed that in discussions with the publisher they mentioned in most cases, while the authors agents submitted their bio information, the info was also typically proofed and approved by the individual authors prior to publication.

'Course it's not that great a stretch to believe a man who would lie about such personal life details like when and where his parents met (at a civil rights rally which took place 4 yrs after he was born), or about how his Mom had "battled with uncaring insurance companies before her death", which he carped on about in many of his speeches as he sought backing for his wildly unpopular Obozocare legislation when facts provided show no such battle, much less even any wrangling ever took place at all, would also fabricate other life details to best suit the scenario at hand, facts and truth be damned.

Show me a man that would lie about such intimate details of their life and I'll tellya that same individual is very likely a pathological liar, an observation psychological profilers will typically point to as well.

In typical social justice/libspeak fashion it's amazing how you'd choose to attack the messenger (his literary agent), as opposed to the message itself, which is in this case is either manipulation of the factual details, or indeed the real truth itself