Just an observation, but here goes ...

Every word on every page of any version of the bible and every other religious text was written by men.

While every such text claims to have been divinely inspired or "dictated" one stark reality still exists in each instance, which is in fact, there's yet to have ever been verifiable proof that any such god existed, in the past or present.

It's always seemed decidedly odd that in science until a concept or construct is provable it's known as a theory. Yet for believers of the improvable construct of any deity such proof is similarly not required before acceptance of such a construct as factual.

In life, literature and moovies when people/characters announce "You'll have to have faith/trust in me" it tends to denote that no real truth exists and often that someone is attempting to mislead another. Curious how believers of improvable gods tend to use that same concept to assign some value to truth for their professions of belief in their god.

If believers of all camps of religious theorum would at least be honest with themselves and others and at least admit their postulations were indeed religious theory, instead of professing it to instead be some form of factual, provable information I'd have much more respect for their protestations.

Even Einsteins well respected and long held scientific Theory of Relativity is now being questioned as invalidateable since new experimentation has cast doubt on its validity.

Strangely however, religious theorums that date back thousands of years which can as yet still put forth no proof of their validity boldly still assert to hold forth that they are "the truth" while never offering any validateable evidence to support them and instead claim "You must have faith to believe"