GAK, as one quite competent in the subtleties of language were it my intention to tell you to fuck off, that's what I'd have said. I strive diligently to leave as little as possible of what I write with any need for individual interpretation, so do yourself a favor and never try to put words in my mouth

What I did say is you have no dog in the fight and not living in this country, hence, no skin in the game, coupled with no real basic knowledge of the issues being discussed so why bother even entering into it at all?

Every assertion you've made about Obozo, the vetting process, his history/background and the intricacies of American legislative policies and jurisprudence have only related you have no educational basis to even enter into such a discussion.

If you want to make a case against anything I've said here would it not seem relevant that you at least have an idea of where it is you choose to position yourself from? Does it not seem foolhardy to enter into debate without even a basic understanding of the topic