Blah, anyone with a brain would be hard put to claim racism is non-existent, yet a valid case can be also presented that only whites are held accountable as racists.

The actions of anyone can be racist, whites do not have a lock on that capability, nor does any other race. However, racism is discrimination or differential treatment of someone based on their race and .... differential treatment or discrimination because of their race. What many govt regulations effectively put into place is also discriminational policies as it then forces preferential treatment of minorities which itself is purely discriminatory against non-minorities.

But, remove all claims of racism from this argument and get to what is fact. When you get to the core of this discussion the simple unavoidable truth remains that Obozo has effectively sealed all personal records about his past and anyone even asking why this was done is cast as being infantile or racist for even posing such a question.

The burning question this raises to many people is why is it unreasonable to ask every effort possible be made to make this information available for public scrutiny? If open, honest and verifiable transparency of issues of such obvious import is unreasonable, I fail to see how a logical case can be made against asking for it.

Failing to allow release of these documents becomes at best questionable, if not outright suspect as to why they would need to be sealed at all if there's "nothing to see here" as is so vehemently claimed

BTW, even digital forensics that have already been done point to several discrepencies within the released document that certainly raise some concerns about what was released but I'm sure all of this will be vilified and swept under the racist rug too