"there are a handful of regulars to this site that suffer from confirmation bias as well as attitude polarization...you could hit them in the face with an oil tanker full of facts and they will rebut and stand firm on their toy sailboat full of misinformation, because that sailboat is what the want to be the truth...
they won't even bother to look up these conditions, let alone realize that they suffer from them..."

Seems clear enough to me that the above statements would seem to point to the idea that as one of the "handful of regulars" you are mentioning my logic is flawed in my beliefs so I'm askin for that "oil tanker full of facts" you mention to rebut the "toy sailboat full of misinformation" I hold as the truth.

And, since the discussion at hand is Obama, how could I draw any other conclusion than that you disagree with what's been stated which is why I then asked for a list of his accomplishments, though I see just as I expected, that's not to be forthcoming.

It's all well and good to sit on the sidelines and take pot shots at others ideas but if you really have anything of meaning to relate you have to be able to MAKE some relevant point, which it seems you are either incapable or ineffective in doing, again .... 'bout what I expected from a liberal backer

Takin the Captain Obvious approach and stating all politicians are basically dishonest is merely a diversionary tactic, though this too is a common tactic when liberals are pressed for an answer. Nothin seems to bother a liberal much more than askin them to actually PROVE their point by using logic and reason