Lexx, which bible are you reading? King James version, written after many of Shakespeare's plays? Sorry but Zeus and the Greeks make more sense than your books that are poorly (or cleverly, depending on your taste for propaganda and control) translated renderings into English from older languages.

This is a major problem with Xtianity, so few people read the originals, and so few originals exist that the books cannot be trusted. It's like watching Romeo & Juliet and claiming to have read the first folio. On top of which I have sat in a room with two academics, bible experts who could read the latin and other languages, and listened while they argued about this and that. If the professors (English system, not American, so they had studied 10+ years) are unable to agree on interpretation of now dead languages then the King James and all of the contemporary (sic) versions are as good as useless. At least historically, and in the sense that they can be taken as gospel. The bible is the biggest con job the world has ever seen. It is as valid as if I had written it myself. And if you do use the King James, you might want to take a close, critical look at who King James I of England was and what his political (not religious) motivation was and who he employed to create his new, definitely not Catholic, story book.

I might as well tell you now that I am 100% with MrKim on this one, save you bother of trying to convince me there is a heaven, a hell or a god.

Embrace the universe and all there is in it, no god, no fear of retribution, just wonder and the love you, Lexx, fail to understand when you talk of it.