An interesting set of ideas and explanations above shaDEz, and when I get home to my main computer this evening I'll forward along some links to a long conference given by a quite distinguished group of scientists relating to the concepts of "God vs Science" that seems quite relevant in such a discussion.
One thought for now though is that while science has no inherent need or function to disprove religon, as doing so can never validate science, religon seemingly does have a definite need and functions on many levels to disprove, disavow or downplay scientific logic or findings
You may optionally give an explanation for why this post was reported, which will be sent to the moderators along with the report. This can help the moderator to understand why you reported the post.
