I don't ever really care how anyone rates any of my pics, I mean really, like I'm gonna win a trip to Paris or somethin

I do however take exception with 2 notions posted above.

1. Another very suspicious mention by an oddly "anonymous" poster about this chic bein 14 .... sounds like someone we all know is prone to such comments who otherwise posts under a username ... hmmmm, why doncha grind that ax some more dillweed

2. If Met Art were prone to airbrushing dudn it seem as if the moles and freckles would be the 1st things they'd take out? And why in the hell would they even bother to airbrush a non nude pic at all?

In my experiences Met Art is one of the premier sites who actually seek to do all natural photography of ones just like this chic, who are simply beautiful without trying to "play" with their images at all. With likely a few thousand Met Art pics in my collection I've yet to have come across even one that seems as if it's been manipulated.

Then again, all things are possible, so as always, YMMV