madmex2000 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well its a damn good thing there was someone to
> stop the war machine. Its east to comply and be
> obeident to the military. HISTORY HAS ALSO SHOWN
> WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO SOCIETYS THAT CLOSE THERE
> EYES AND NOT RESIST MILITARY RULE.


Military rule and allowing the military to suceed at a task they're given without decision making by NON military leaders are hardly the same thing. Tying the militarys hands in deciding what can and can't be targets in all other areas other than outright offensives/attacks upon non combatants is total BS.

The real tragedy is that these tactics by politicians make our military seem ineffective in their ability to do the job they're given, which is far from the reality that would occur if they were simply given a task and the freedom to get it done without non military personnel making the calls.

My feelings are that if the same campaign being conducted in Iraq had been carried out with the military makin all the calls it would have lasted a matter of a few months and at a lot less risk to the soldiers involved.

The politicians in their efforts at waging war within the confines of political correctness (a totally stupid and rediculous concept!) put our troops at far greater risk than what their commanders own decisions would.



> YOU DONT NEED THE US GOVERMENT TO PROTECT YOU.THEY
> LIE!!!!!!!ASK ME I AM INJUN.

Hmmm .... so on 9-11 when the shit hit the fan I suppose the government shouldn't have grounded all the other planes in the air in an attempt to stop any further possible attacks that might have been in progress? The tightening of airport/aircraft security measures mandated by the government in an attempt to avert similar future attacks should not have occured either then huh ? Or when foods are found to be contaminated with harmful bacteria the government again should do nothing, right ?

I'm not much for governmental intervention in my life either, but there is a definite need for the governments protection in the above mentioned and MANY other instances.

So .... to make a blanket statement that we don't need their protection only once points up your own lack of knowledge madnez and the roots of your heritage really have no more relevence in such a discussion than do modern blacks demanding retribution for the fact that their now long dead ancestors were slaves.

If you are indeed a native Indian by heritage YOU have more rights than I as a white native born American do. There is no such sanctuary in existance in the US for MY race to be allowed free reign as any native Indian does, I can't get ANY of the program benefits offered to the native Indians, nor am I awarded the same minority status rights or tax exemption status rights you posess by nothing more than the fact that you were ever born at all, so just get off that BS