Report
Are you sure you want to report this post?

Re: Image comments for the only thing yanks understand
Posted by: strife
Date: 11/05/2005 10:56AM
duuuuuude has the second ammendment all wrong. What it really says is this:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

It does not say only militia should have guns. It says "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The "well regulated Militia" portion of it is simply giving the most logical rationale of the time for the right to keep and bear arms.

Just because that portion of it, the rationale given, is outdated, doesn't mean that it's suddenly no longer a right. There are several new explanations to keep and bear arms, not the least of which is to control the population of animals through hunting.

If we banned guns, seeing how many animals no longer have natural prey outside of humans, they would overpopulate, eat all of the farmer's crops while getting diseases that could spread to livestock. We couldn't eat the animals because we can't hunt them, couldn't eat the vegtables because they ate them all, and couldn't eat the livestock because they're diseased!

But if you're going to take our guns away, at least be man enough not to circumvent the Constitution and get an Ammendment passed to repeal or reword the 2nd Ammendment.

And by the way, I'm not a redneck. I'm college educated. I've never been drunk because that's an utter waste of braincells. I voted for Bush. Oh, and unlike you, I still gave respect to Bill Clinton even though I and half of the country never voted for him and he took the U.S. unilaterally (by the same definition of unilateral that's being used for the Iraq War, ignoring over 30 allies) to war in the Balkans without U.N. approval.

Oh, and I thought Bush did have the consent of congress to go to war in Iraq, dumbass, including people such as John Edwards and John Kerry. You might want to check the congressional record on that one, you retard. A president can't go to war without consent of congress (well, he can only for 90 days assuming congress isn't in session, but that's not the case here).

You may optionally give an explanation for why this post was reported, which will be sent to the moderators along with the report. This can help the moderator to understand why you reported the post.