Actually it's probably extremely easy for us to put up when an image was posted. It's just in a standard posix timestamp, which is no different to forum or image comments. It's just converted.
I like the idea, the problem being that the whole point of having somebody go through the images and help us keep on top of the bad ones is to remove them from view. For example, on the porn site, I don't want people to delete kiddy porn, and all it does is put it in a special "this is too dodgy for the site, but come have a look at it here".
The problem being, plus/porn share their codebase. What happens to one effectively happens to the other.
We originally considered when a moderator deleted an image myself, revert or dk would manually inspect them, say at the end of the week, but to be honest.. I just haven't got any time. My girlfriend has moved in lately, my job is a nightmare at the moment, and real life commitments are just destroying any time I have to look at the site. I probably have only seen a handful of the last 10,000 images uploaded.
DK on the other hand is a lazy fucker, who really should be adding some of the new ideas he's had for a year to the site. Otherwise, I think this is a great idea, but if there was to be peer reviews of deleted images I think it's better off that it's myself or dk rather than 'the general public'.
As for the rest of it, you've all clearly spent too much time on here if you know in fairly good detail how the site works, ie image numbers, how things are moved etc. I'm impressed
And yes, the "safe" category just omits the erotica labelled images. Unfortunately, there's a pack of retards that vote porn images as .. non porn (not that there's many here anymore) and good stuff as erotic/adult. It's not funny, it's immature, and if you do it again I'm gonna send darkklown around to hump your leg. We know where you live.
Finally, woberto - how did you know we were too lazy to split the sites properly?