Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 12, 2005 03:18AM
I LIKE ALL THE SHOTS OF THE MODELS...BUT THE "EXTREME" AND "WEIRD" PORN STUFF IS GETTING OUT OF CONTROL! I'VE ONLY BEEN CHECKING THIS SITE FOR COUPLE MONTHS NOW...BUT IT HAS DEFINATELY GONE DOWNHILL! THERE'S VERY LITTLE VARIETY ANYMORE...WAAAAAAY TOO MUCH PORN! KEEP THE SEXY MODELS COMING...BUT LOOSE THE GRAPHIC AND GROSS PORN!!
Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 12, 2005 03:48AM
except the old lady who lost her dentures, that was hilarious
Posted by: Mint [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 12, 2005 05:04AM
and lose the caps
Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 12, 2005 05:38AM
Maybe the weird and gross porn is a response to your model porn,one mans dream is anothers nightmare,stop the crotch shots everyother pic and maybe the other stuff will also stop.Once you have seen one pussy shot how many more do we have to see?Other than hair or no hair,size oflabia,they are all the same.Just Google your own jack off matieral and don't impose it on all.
Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 12, 2005 09:21AM
I don't reckon there's any more or less porn on here than has been the norm.

The question you're really putting out there is should the site be moderated (or moderated more than it is at present). If that's a road you want to go down then plus613 can hardly claim to have "one of the last truly free corners of the internet". But is that such a noble ideal to covet? Personally I don't think it is. If it were up to me I'd have eighty percent of the porn moderated off the site, leaving only suggestive model/amateur shots, celebrity/humourous nudes, girls nextdoor, and so forth. But hey, it ain't my site.
Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 14, 2005 07:21PM
I will solve your problem with this site.......quit looking at it
Posted by: Anonymous [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 15, 2005 12:32AM
Having the new catagories is a BIG plus...but if ANYONE can catagorize
a pic, then are bound to be mis-catagorized photos...which there
already
are...hopefully the few that are in the wrong catagory will be
corrected in the future by the guys who run this site...HOPEFULLY!
Posted by: Mint [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 15, 2005 04:53AM
normal maybe for the last couple months 116134
Posted by: pulse [x] - (205.188.116.---)
Date: January 15, 2005 07:26AM
An image requires 4 vote minimum to be categorised (that is, 4 different people). If 5 people come along and vote it into a different category, the new category is automatically selected.

It's done by whatever the most people vote it into, so if there's wrong categories, it's at least been done by a selection of people instead of just 1 smiling smiley
Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 
Message: