image stats
rating
3.01
votes
134
views
2466
uploader
Anonymous
comments
25
date added
2006-02-14
category
Sport
previous votes
Loading..
Asshole of the Month
1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
Asshole of the Month

"a man in a suit speaking into a microphone"

Rate image:
[ | | ]
[ | ]
Comments for: Asshole of the Month
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 14, 2006 09:25PM

is that why dick was quail hunting?
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 14, 2006 09:41PM

There is something seriously wrong with this dude. Thank God he never became president.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 14, 2006 11:16PM

More like Fagot of the month, he sucks mohammeds cock..read the news
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 03:14AM

Look for a definition: Sedition. His behavior is the textbook definition. Perhaps even all the way to treasonus. He is pathetic, and now dangerous
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 06:53AM


Anonymous@121121

Horse manure. If dissent if wrong then the founding fathers are 100 times worse.

Anonymous@13621

Obviously you are retarded.

Gore has not supported internal resistance or insurrection within the US.

You fucks are too lame to cast judgement. Keep your mouths shut and the world will be better off.
Duane Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 11:10AM

The democratic party as a whole has by calling for impeachment and being obstructive instead of constructive during time of war.They have no real plan,only a hindsight 20/20 view.Those fucks are too lame to cast judgement.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 01:14PM

So beast, you are saying it is ok for people speak out against the government but it is not ok for people to speak out against the people speaking. Sorry but if it is right for people to talk against the government then it is also right for people to talk against those people.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 04:02PM

duane@3154
You saying that Bush had a plan besides:
1. invade Iraq and take oil
2. invade Iran and take oil
3. get drunk

jgoins
is calling someone a fagot and saying he sucks mohammeds cock in the same league as protesting against domestic spying and invading other countries on false pretexts?

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 04:03PM

If there are any Republican supporters ,why don't you list some of your great Republican accomplishments ,its been six years of bush. you own the house and the senate and the president. TELL ME!
tribucian Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 05:03PM

1. A bloodless coup that has been accepted as a legally binding election (the first time).

2. A "Stepford wife" in the White House; seriously, who can look at Laura's glazed eyes and silly grin and believe she isn't drugged to the gills?

3. People hunting; of course, the VP still needs to work on this one.

4. A new lexicon; for example, "strategery."

5. This is one of my favorites. Peace-of-mind in that I can fly the airways safely without fearing nailfile-welding crazies.
John_Stone Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 06:20PM

At least we have to take our shoes off in airports now. That's something.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 15, 2006 08:25PM

tribucian:
Yeah, not to mention they now check your tonsils from the rear end..
1.- thats why 90% voted (no shit)
2.- she's hot (really!)
3.- grow up and get out hunting more often asshole
4.- see #3
5.- you can always go greyhound
Kind Regards
A@121121
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 01:45AM


Duane@3154

The US is NOT at war. That is PR BS for the stupid.

WTF is being contructive during a time of war anyway ? Do you mean be a YES man and give someone whatever they want ? What horseshiite.

You seem to have forgotten history around the time of the revolution. The colonists told King George to suck it. And we know how that battle ended, don't we ?

jgoins

Once again your reading skills show their subpar levels.

Anonymous@13621 tried to introduce definition without consulting a dictionary first.

Labeling people with the intentional use of an incorrect definition is intellectually disingenuous.

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 02:48AM

Brainwashed dumbasses, mostly likely on the Federal government teat, particularly as paid murderers with a get out of jail free card.

Now I MIGHT be persuaded to think that even though a BAD bargain, it might have SOME value if the people they were murdering had possessed SOME SLIGHT connection to 9/11. But of course, THAT ain't happening. They're just the biggest recruitment tool AL-QUAEDA has.

This country would be in a HELL of a lot better shape now if Gore had been elected. I'll take boring over stupid SEVEN DAYS A WEEK....

9013052132 Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 09:58AM

BWAAAHH! It's Bush's fault!!
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 11:40AM

How do you deduce that 13621's 'use of an incorrect definition' was intentional? Maybe he's just ignorant or ill-informed, like you.
Duane Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 12:21PM

What the fuck is war you twit.Yeah I know my history and the colonist did not tell him to go suck it,I believe it was taxation without representation.
You really are an idiot Beast,you would give away your rights to a gun to your party lines and then talk of revolution.Kinda like showing up to a gunfight with a knife.More along the lines of you showing up with your brain in this discusion.
Reading skills,lets talk about your spelling"WTF is being contructive".You idiot,you would tear us apart from the inside during war time instead of coming up with a real plan(which your party cant)they critisize the administration at every turn.
You seem like the kind of moron that would enter a fight still wondering if you could win or if there is a way out.Its the fundamental difference between your party and mine.If I have any idea you will hit me at any time were going to go right then not after you get a chance to prepare.I also would'nt doubt whether your ass would be kicked or not,it would just happen.Your party is about hesitation and criticizing,its all your good for.You could tell someone why they lost but not how to win.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 03:00PM


Anonymous@2067

"How do you deduce that 13621's 'use of an incorrect definition' was intentional?"

Read his post. It says "Look for a definition: Sedition. His behavior is the textbook definition"

The word "textbook" says he intentionally use an incorrect definition.

when you claim to know the definition of something and claim it came from a textbook and you are wrong, you intentionally stated an incorrect definition. Otherwise you would not have claimed it was from a testbook at all. But this poster tried to make an argument from authority (refering to a textbook) to give creedence to his statement.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 03:03PM


Duane@3154

You really are a sad person. You want the conservative side to be right so bad that you lie to yourself and others.

The US is not at war. The US is conducting a military action without and enemy. War has very definite aims and declared enemies.

A "war on terror" is a bs bumber sticker slogan for stupid people. I guess we know where you fall. Sucker !
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 07:20PM

rubber baby buggy "bumbers"?

that doesn't work.

well maybe.

nope!
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 07:22PM

oh yes, and the oil that we "took" sure did help the price to go down too......not
Duane Report This Comment
Date: February 16, 2006 09:14PM

Beast your beyond reason,just need to go check yourself into the mental hospital.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: February 18, 2006 06:40AM


Duane the Tard

Prove the US is at war rather than trying to control the world through artificial means with puppet governments.

The fact is that 99.99% of the public is unaware of what Bush's aims and means are. You are in that minority.

Why do you think Democraps are selling the same BS of a "War on Terror" as republicans ? That should be a tipoff that something is a miss in these divisive times.

there is one basic element between dems and repubs. Promising security whether you can deliver it or not post 9-11 makes voters vote your direction. Nevermind that the US could not defend itself from attack any better today than it could on 9-11.

That is right MFer. The US is still just as vulnerable today as 9-11.

You like fools who believe politicians and TV have been suckered.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 18, 2006 10:36AM

WTF"The fact is that 99.99% of the public is unaware of what Bush's aims and means are. {You are in that minority."}
WTF{"Prove the US is at war},{rather than trying to control the world through artificial means with puppet governments."}I have never tried to control the world through pupet government.

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: February 18, 2006 12:11PM

As if Beast wan't boring enough, he's now trying to wear us down with his holiday pictures.