image stats
rating
2.78
votes
189
views
2742
uploader
quasi
comments
6
date added
2009-06-07
category
Misc
previous votes
Loading..
getting screwed by going green
1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
getting screwed by going green

"a group of people standing on a roof with solar panels"

Rate image:
[ | | ]
[ | ]
Comments for: getting screwed by going green
quasi Report This Comment
Date: June 07, 2009 12:23PM

I'm all for alternative, renewable energy sources but there's always the law of unintended cosequences at work.


Published: Sunday, June 7, 2009 at 1:00 a.m.
Last Modified: Saturday, June 6, 2009 at 9:02 p.m.
A Sarasota County rancher and environmentalist spent $500,000 for one of the largest private solar projects in Florida, expecting big savings on energy costs while setting an example for others to follow.

But instead of cutting her monthly energy bills from roughly $5,000 to $1,000, Mary Clark's 300-panel solar array has saved little. Florida Power & Light buys the excess energy from Clark's ranch and sells it back to her for twice as much.

Though legal, the charges reveal flaws in a new state law designed to promote solar power by reimbursing private producers for their excess energy.

Clark's experience underscores the influence big utilities wield in Florida, as the state moves tentatively to diversify from fossil fuels into more renewable energy sources.

It could also discourage the grass-roots investment in alternative sources that advocates say is crucial to adoption of emerging sources and energy independence.

Clark's difficulties have implications for farmers, homeowners' associations, condominium and motel complexes and anyone else seeking to share solar energy between multiple buildings, electric meters and accounts.

"Instead of looking at this thing with pride, I get sick to my stomach," said the 88-year-old Clark. "I stepped up. I put up the biggest rig of anybody and I had visions of being a model that people could learn from. But that isn't the case at all."

Clark is fighting with the power company and writing state legislators for help. But power company officials blame Clark's solar contractor for a flawed design in her system and say there is nothing they can do. State regulators side with FPL.

"These aren't rules that we made up," said FPL spokeswoman Jackie Anderson. "We're just following the law."

10 barns, 11 wells

Ranches and farms have extensive roof space and open land that could help boost solar energy production around the state. But, as in Clark's case, many have more than one meter to measure power use.

A 2008 solar law fails to account for homes, farms and businesses with multiple electric meters. And that creates a potential barrier for people to profit from installing panels.

"If we're going to get where we need to be with solar we've got to make it as easy as possible for people like this," said Rep. Keith Fitzgerald, D-Sarasota.

The problem stems in part from the fact that energy consumption on ranches such as Clark's cover a large area, while the solar panels are more concentrated.

The 300-acre Triple J Ranch has 11 wells with electric pumps to distribute water. A big free-standing feed grinder uses electricity to ration food for 130 horses and 120 cows.

Ten barns, three show arenas, two bunk houses, a chow house and RVs also need power. Many of the buildings have separate electric meters.

But instead of spreading Triple J's solar panels across the ranch so they would feed into each of nine electric meters, Greenlaw Solar Group installed the panels in clusters of 150 on two horse stables with low-pitched roofs, feeding into two meters.

Simple and efficient, thought Greenlaw owner Doug Greenlaw.

He and Clark thought FPL could combine her nine meter bills into one and deduct from her total power bill the solar energy she produced at the retail rate of 12 cents per kilowatt hour.

'It has to be easier'

However, an archaic 1969 law generally prohibits combining multiple electric meters under one bill. That skews how rates are calculated and hurts other ratepayers, according to state regulators with the Public Service Commission.

Clark could save more if the solar panels were tied into meters for facilities that use a lot of power, instead of the low-consumption horse barns. The only way she can directly tap the energy is to run expensive wiring across the whole ranch.

Instead, all of the excess energy Clark is generating -- in just the last month alone, the two meters her panels are tied into have racked up enough extra power to run an average house for a year -- is sent to FPL.

But rather than crediting her at a rate of 12 cents per kilowatt hour, FPL buys her energy back for just 6 cents per kilowatt hour. It gives her a check at the end of the year, instead of deducting the amount from her monthly bills.

Greenlaw faults FPL, saying the power company opposes solar energy and is "doing everything they can to stop it."

"The design of the system is not the problem, it's the way FPL does billing," the solar contractor said.

Rex James of Solar Direct in Bradenton said the problem could have been avoided, but said the law makes it tougher to implement smaller-scale solar projects.

"It's a logistics problem," James said. "I've anticipated it and avoided it in projects but it shouldn't be such an issue. They need to change the law."

But FPL contends it is simply following the 2008 law regulating "net metering" of solar operations.

"The key is to put the renewable energy generation on a meter that's using a significant load," said FPL's Anderson.

Private solar producers can get only 6 cents for their energy because that is the "fuel" price FPL charges if the cost of providing transmission lines and other infrastructure is factored out, regulators say.

If Clark got the 12-cent rate, she essentially would be using FPL's transmission lines to spread the energy around her property for free, said Public Service Commission spokeswoman Cindy Muir.

Adding insult to injury is the different treatment given to farmers generating excess energy from anaerobic digesters, which burn methane from cows. These farmers are allowed to combine their bills under the 2008 law, and deduct excess energy from one bill.

The irony for Clark is that some utilities actually pay solar producers a premium for their energy. Gainesville pays 32 cents per kilowatt hour because solar power is considered a public benefit that should be encouraged and subsidized.

"When you look at it that way, I'm taking a real licking. But I don't regret it for a minute," said Clark, an ardent environmental advocate who spent five years in Newfoundland tagging humpback whales before moving to Florida. "No matter how you slice it, it's the right thing to do. But if they want more people to get involved, it has to be a lot easier."
DarkKlown Report This Comment
Date: June 08, 2009 09:19AM

In Australia if you have a solar setup you can actually sell the excess power to the companies for more than you can buy it from them. So for example if you pay 12 cents for power, you can sell it to them for 14 cents (taking into account government subsidies).

If she just spent $500,000 on solar arrays I'm sure the main cost of that wouldn't of been installation. Meaning she could now move the arrays around the farm and it would suit everyone. I think the thought behind not allowing people to mix meters is that different parts of the grid could be being fed by different power sources. If your going to spend 1/2 a million on solar one would think you'd want to be totally independent from the grid.

I guess people should think before spending is the moral of the story. Or maybe the government is evil?
quasi Report This Comment
Date: June 08, 2009 10:58AM

I think it's a matter of finding the pitfalls and loopholes as this technology works it's way more into the mainstream then filling in and closing those pitfalls and loopholes. It was the pioneers who ended up with the most arrows in their backs and so it is with technological pioneers. Florida is a natural for solar and wind generated power, Florida Power and Light is in the process of building what I think is the largest solar array in the world about thirty miles (48km) from where I sit, but photovoltaics and batteries are still in babyland. I hope to see the day when individuals can purchase an affordable system combining wind and solar that will provide all their electrical needs.
FrostedApe Report This Comment
Date: June 08, 2009 02:27PM

I'm changing my boiler to run on whale oil. It's a renewable resource, and carbon neutral.
quasi Report This Comment
Date: June 08, 2009 02:40PM

Glad I've lost a lot of weight; those harpoons hurt like a bitch.
FrostedApe Report This Comment
Date: June 08, 2009 03:10PM

Like the rest of the country, we have lots and lots of really fat people, but one whale lasts me all winter. Even a really, really fat person, you're lucky to get ten gallons of oil. Too much work.