image stats
rating
3.05
votes
466
views
10305
uploader
DoneGone
comments
15
date added
2009-02-24
category
Sport
previous votes
Loading..
Am I interrupting you?
1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
Am I interrupting you?

"a woman in lingerie lying on a table"

Rate image:
[ | | ]
[ | ]
Comments for: Am I interrupting you?
meeeee Report This Comment
Date: February 24, 2009 03:10PM

why now must you plaster plus 613 on the pics? we know where we are
SkullandChains Report This Comment
Date: February 24, 2009 05:00PM

If you're having a problem that has to do with this site, post your comments in the forum. You're less likely to get ignored there.
ToucanSam Report This Comment
Date: February 24, 2009 10:30PM

Why?
Lexx Report This Comment
Date: February 24, 2009 10:35PM

I think they added the logo for the same reason they deny requests to remove pictures.

Once you upload something here you are basically donating that image to the site with your name as uploader and the stats recorded and all that.

Correct me if I am wrong Pulse and DK but I think you added the logo so anyone who uses it after it's been uploaded here knows where it comes from. 90% of the other image hosting sites also add a logo or some kind of unique watermark to identify where the image was taken from.

If it was your image then you have a copy without the logo on it, if someone else uploaded it try contacting them via PM and see if they will give you a copy without the logo if you really want one that badly.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: February 25, 2009 12:34AM

there is also a time space discontinuum deviance from the parralel universe of comments and the destruction at the cellular level of all users in question, thus creating a dispertion of molecules large enough to drive a truck through creating a cascade effect

nevermind the 3 threads on the subject are better. spinning smiley sticking its tongue out
ORLANDO399 Report This Comment
Date: February 25, 2009 05:56AM

IOTW? smileys with beer
Lexx Report This Comment
Date: February 25, 2009 06:35AM

I didn't even know there were threads about it on the forums.

Sorry to say but the forums here are bland and boring with lame ass threads like 1 word stories and I stopped checking them a while ago.
zxz555 Report This Comment
Date: February 25, 2009 11:09AM

lexx, youcan start a new an interesting thread yourself, did you know that?
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 25, 2009 11:58AM

Putting the logo on them signifies that plus613 now owns them and holds the copyright which is not true for plus or porn613 or even the majority of uploaders. The copyright belongs to the person who originally created the image not anyone else who might have downloaded it from some other site. Plus and pron613 may run into trouble with this practice sometime in the future. I personally have had problems with this on my celebrity website I used to own. I was sued by Sophia Loren over the mere mention of her on my site and lost money on that deal.
SkullandChains Report This Comment
Date: February 25, 2009 03:34PM

I think, and you can correct me if I'm wrong DK, Pulse, that the purpose for adding the logo is not to claim ownership, but to get the word out about this site, generating more people, perhaps even generate more revenue. The logo doesn't bother me unless it interferes with the picture. Doesn't seem to happen too often.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 25/02/2009 03:45PM by SkullandChains.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: February 26, 2009 01:24PM

It doesn't bother me either but if an owner of a photo sees it on this site with the logo on it his lawyers will have no problem in court proving copyright infringement. You might better consult a lawyer about this before it becomes an issue with all the lawsuits happening to internet sites. Many people nowadays see this kind of thing as quick money and are bringing lawyers to bear in an effort to make money and they don't care who it hurts.
dowry Report This Comment
Date: March 05, 2009 02:46PM

so, theoretically, i could anonymously post a photo that i undeniably own the copyright to and then sue the shit out of yall when you put your logo on it? perhaps i don't need to get a job after all…
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: March 06, 2009 12:53PM

To be honest that could happen.
YEAH BABY Report This Comment
Date: March 18, 2009 07:40PM

Yes, Yes you are, and you snooty ass B to the I to the T to the C to the H, need something shoved up your arse and I'm the man with the equipment. Now this may hurt alittle but I'm sure a lady with your attitude has had this done before. I love the nasty.
pulse Report This Comment
Date: May 27, 2014 10:29AM

Interesting.

Incidentally we never ignored people's comments, there was just years we were both super busy and when people actually did post images and comments we couldn't keep up.

It's a lot easier now. Btw this site has never had revenue. These days I own the servers it runs on but my estimation would be $10k+ running costs over the years and less than $100 income when we did run ads.

Even porn site makes $0, but at least the running costs are shared with here