Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 10:27AM
Throw the lying bastard in jail.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 12:59PM
A good man and a fine leader.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 03:05PM
Also he looks like a monkey.....
me_one Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 05:16PM
so only 49% of americans are completelly brainwashed, thats a lot less than i
thought
John_Stone Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 06:45PM
Hey Beast, don't just make unsupported allegations. Back your shit up with
links to information, or just shut up. The signal:noise ratio is getting worse.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 08:52PM
John_Stone
Zogby.com
John_Stone Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 09:40PM
You could have been a bit more specific, but thanks.
" *Impeachment Question Shows Bitterness of Divide*
In a sign of the continuing partisan division of the nation, more than
two-in-five (42%) voters say that, if it is found that President Bush did not
tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress should
hold him accountable through impeachment. While half (50%) of respondents do not
hold this view, supporters of impeachment outweigh opponents in some parts of
the country.
Among those living in the Western states, a 52% majority favors Congress using
the impeachment mechanism while just 41% are opposed; in Eastern states, 49% are
in favor and 45% opposed. In the South, meanwhile, impeachment is opposed by
three-in-five voters (60%) and supported by just one-in-three (34%); in the
Central/Great Lakes region, 52% are opposed and 38% in favor.
Impeachment is overwhelmingly rejected in the Red States—just 36% say they
agree Congress should use it if the President is found to have lied on Iraq,
while 55% reject this view; in the “Blue States” that voted for
Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry in 2004, meanwhile, a plurality of 48% favors
such proceedings while 45% are opposed.
A large majority of Democrats (59%) say they agree that the President should be
impeached if he lied about Iraq, while just three-in-ten (30%) disagree. Among
President Bush’s fellow Republicans, a full one-in-four (25%) indicate they
would favor impeaching the President under these circumstances, while
seven-in-ten (70%) do not. Independents are more closely divided, with 43%
favoring impeachment and 49% opposed."
[
zogby.com]
John_Stone Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 09:42PM
18867: pardon the sarcasm, I misread and thought that aDCBeast posted that
comment. Much obliged.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 29, 2005 11:11PM
John_Stone
No offense taken. But I didnn't have time to post more.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 31, 2005 05:05AM
Good strong leader of and for free people, not a pussy like Clinton. I didn't
vote for him to get pussy in the White house. I voted for him to keep us safe
and protect our way of life with his nose to the grind stone instead of up
Monica's ass. Clinton should be coming up for parole about now.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 31, 2005 05:49AM
Anonymous@238240
Then why was Clinton the president who did the ground work for the patriot act
and the occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan ? Clinton started the destruction of
the bill of rights and Bush torched it.
If you voted for president to keep you safe then Bush certainly wasn't the right
person. He has put you in more danger than you were in 5 years ago. Bush let
Usama go in a secret deal. Bush also invaded a country that was stable because
of his vanity.
Since when is getting a bj between consenting adults a crime ? Oh .. I get it.
It fits your lame political ideology.
Do you ask people who they voted for before you help them out ? Sell them
something in a store ? Or work with them at work ? If you are going to have
that lame brained ideology you better go all the way to support it. Wouldn't
want to be a pussy.
duane Report This Comment Date: September 01, 2005 01:11AM
Beast,you sound so stupid I dont even need to reply!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: September 01, 2005 01:37PM
See DCBeast's 23-y-o wife at:
[
www.porn613.com]
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: March 15, 2006 11:12PM
Anonymous@46115 .. you shouldn't talk about your mom that way.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 05, 2006 01:02PM
Thats all you idiots think of impeach the president if you liberal wacks
stopped trying to cause problems by protesting the U.S.A. would be a better
place. We should just drop a mega bomb and turn Iraq into rubble then our troops
could come home.
Richard_M_Nixon Report This Comment Date: August 08, 2006 01:13AM
under the articles of impeachment, how would Mr. Bush be impeached? He has not
lied to a grand jury (like Bubba Clinton). So what acticle of impeachment would
Mr. Bush be impeached??
"The subjects of [impeachment] jurisdiction are those offenses which
proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or
violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar
propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done
immediately to the society itself. The prosecution of them, for this reason,
will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide
it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused. In many cases
it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their
animosities, partialities, influence, and interest on one side or on the other;
and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision
will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real
demonstrations of innocence or guilt.
Q. What is the standard of proof at trial (in the Senate) of an impeachment?
A. "The standard of proof should be a high one, such as 'clear and
convincing evidence'--the standard used in important, noncriminal cases....
Clear and convincing evidence is typically defined as `that measure or degree of
proof which will produce in the mind of the trier of facts a firm belief or
conviction as to the allegation sought to be established. It is intermediate,
being more than a mere preponderance, but not to the extent of such certainty as
is required beyond a reasonable doubt as in criminal cases." R. Rotunda, An
Essay on the Constitutional Parameters of Federal Impeachment, 76 Ky. L.J. 707,
719 (1988).
The_Central_Scrutinizer Report This Comment Date: September 15, 2006 02:52AM
IN 2001, 2002, 2003, especially in 2004 AND EVEN in 2005 I told you people he
was the most vapid, banal and insipid blight on the United States in our
collective history. (Despite some stiff competition from all over the
ideological map especially fundmentalist theocrats)
And I WAS RIGHT.
Now, get to work getting rid of these stupid fucking morons (including the ones
who actually thought this crap up)and take back what's left of what used to be
the greatest nation on Earth.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: September 15, 2006 02:57AM
ahhhhhh hahahahahahahahaha good luck
The_Central_Scrutinizer Report This Comment Date: September 16, 2006 12:45AM
Maybe. But the shithole that used to be the United States is still your fault.
Ahhhhaaaaaahhhhhaaahhhha to you too.
shaDEz Report This Comment Date: September 19, 2006 03:19PM
this is top rated image on this site? wtf is going on?
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: September 19, 2006 04:20PM
daaaaaaaaamn, my vote counts that much?
I'm impressed!
madmex2000 Report This Comment Date: September 21, 2006 10:59PM
heheeh its me again lol....i snuck in here.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: October 02, 2006 01:43AM
Who cares why we went in, it needed to be done and none of the other pussy
countries had the balls to make the world a safer place. Just keep your
collective heads in the sand, ohh don't piss anyone off they not like us.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: October 07, 2006 02:36AM
Anonymous@1639
Funny you that.
"none of the other pussy countries had the balls to make the world a safer
place"
All intelligence agencies worldwide believe that going into Iraq has made the
world more dangerous than ever.
Makes you wonder if the rest of the world knew this would happen. That other
countries wanted terrorist groups to direct their anger at the country that was
responsible for the misuse of people, resources, and countries.
