jgoins Report This Comment
Date: November 02, 2006 12:31PM

If he had been killed immediately then the world would stop trying to combat terrorism and someone else would take over Al Qaeda and nothing would have changed. We have had 5 years of destroying and taking apart Al Qaeda to make them less effective. Bin Ladin will not live forever and as long as he has no effective organization to bring terror on anyone then he will be powerless until the day he dies. Like it or not, but as long as he lives people around the world will continue to fight terrorism.

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: November 02, 2006 02:23PM

The ultimate goal of terrorism is to change society in an incremental or revolutionary way.

Since 9/11, Americans have lost many of their Consitutional freedoms, and the U.S. government has spent billions of dollars. Tight security measures interfere with the way people travel. The economy is beginning a downward spiral. We are losing soldiers every day to insurgents in Iraq (more than 2700 so far, with many more maimed). We are in an intractible war with no way to "win" (as the presidnet defines "winning" and no plan to get out of this quagmire. World attention is focused on the Middle East, and billions of dollars are puring into the region.

In essence, Osama Bin Laden has achieved what he wanted.

madmex2000 Report This Comment
Date: November 02, 2006 03:45PM

Remeber the "War on Drugs " are we winning that? So what makes you think we can win the war on drugs.

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: November 02, 2006 03:54PM

WHY HAVEN'T WE SEEN ANY MORE DANCING VIDEOS ?
MAYBE BECAUSE YOU ARE A "DEAD RAGHEAD"

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: November 02, 2006 04:11PM

binladen still an asshole!

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: November 02, 2006 04:38PM

Osama is alive because George Bush needs him alive. Bush has used the fear of Al Queda to get everything his cold little heart ever desired, from tax cuts to the wealthy to military occupation of oil rich lands.

He's not going to give that up. There's still money to be made.

aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: November 03, 2006 02:24AM

Posted by: Anonymous - Anonymous (IP Logged)
Date: November 02, 2006 10:11AM


Why so down on Bin Laden? CIA Director Bush I hired Bin Laden to fight the russians in the 80s. He served the CIA and the US well by defeating the russians.

Do you have any evidence that Bin Laden orchestrated 9-11 ? NO, You don't! This is a Bush II lie. Atta orchestrated 9-11.

Bin Laden is a former CIA (Bush I) asset that the CIA wants dead for what happened in the past. Saddam was a CIA (Bush I) asset. There is a theme here.

President Clinton, who pussied out by acting like a republican, acted the "kill bin laden" CIA garbage so he made attempts on Bin Ladens life. If you have ever been a CIA assest, your life is in danger. It's how they clean up their messes.

jgoins Report This Comment
Date: November 03, 2006 12:08PM

Bush only has one more year in office and you people think he will destroy America in that time. Our economy is good and getting better instead of the downward spiral that someone with no name stated. You guys spend all your time talking Bush down instead looking for his replacement in '08. While you are berating Bush the republican party will slip in a have a candidate ready to be elected. Spend you time trying to get the democrats to find something to stand for which the American public can support. Being antibush will not be a good enough platform to sway the American public, they will have to get something more substantial to win the election. The Amercan people want someone who will be strong against terrorism not someone who will treat terrorism only as a crime.

aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: November 04, 2006 02:54AM

jgoins ... chickenlittle

Bush started doing damage to the US before he ever became president.

Keep dreaming aout a Repub being president in 09. America is fed up with republican bullshit.

You have also made the stupid mistake that many republicans have made claiming that the anti-bush crowd are all dems or represent the ideology of the democratic party. This is propaganda to get listeners watching or listening for conservative TV and radio pundits.

Bush claims to be tough on terror yet has not proven that he is.

Unless you consider giving borrowed money from China to US defense contractors for useless or ineffective technologies tough on terror.

1. Terrorism has gone up after the invasion of Iraq.

2. Terrorism has gone up against american interests since March of 2003.

3. Invading Iraq has created 2 generations of terrorists.

4. Invading Iraq has angered moderate muslims meaning the US will only get their support or help when it serves their interests rather than principle.

5. Bin Laden, the man the Bush admin named the mastermind of 9-11, is still at large.


These facts says Bush is WEAK on terrorism.


It took 8 years for a major attack on american soil. Bush won't even be in office anymore to say he made the country safer for 8 years.

jgoins Report This Comment
Date: November 04, 2006 10:34PM

Well we only have a few more days to see which way the public is leaning. Everything you stated cannot be substantiated as fact. They are merely your beliefs and fortunately you seem to be in the minority. Just check vote.com to see how the majority of people feel.

Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: November 05, 2006 10:52AM

You mean, the majority of the people that visit that website, to see how they feel.

jgoins Report This Comment
Date: November 05, 2006 01:09PM

Well I saw nothing there which would just bring in people who feel only one way. It would seem to be a good cross section of people as it also corelates with what I see around here.

aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: November 06, 2006 12:06AM

jgoins ... reality avoider

All of the FACTS I cited above were stated with duplicity by the CIA, DIA, NSA, and foreign intelligence services.

You may want to deny the reports by these intelligence agencies like the Bush administration does but it shows that you have lost your grip on reality.

75% of americans believe these same facts before the reports even came out.

You and a minority of fools need to cling to your ideology so badly that admitting YOU WERE WRONG would kill you.

jgoins Report This Comment
Date: November 06, 2006 12:56PM

Well if 75 percent of the people really believed that then Bush never would have been elected. Evidentally the majority of the people didn't believe it.

aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: November 07, 2006 06:59AM

jgoins ... reality avoider


Nice going dumbass. Every one of the reports came out after the 2004 election.

Take your head out of the sand. Maybe you'll actually know what you are talking about.

The 06 elections today are the first elections since these reports.

The 06 elections are the first elections since the reports by David Kay found NO WMDS IN IRAQ!

The american people have not had a chance to show their displeasure with President Bush until today.

Today marks the day American people reclaim their country from the NEOCon fucks

jgoins Report This Comment
Date: November 07, 2006 12:13PM

And when that doesn't happen you will cry "wee wee wee" all the way home.