image stats
date added
previous votes
log in


indent register
indent recover

I'd sexually harass the shit out of her

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
I'd sexually harass the shit out of her

Comments for: I'd sexually harass the shit out of her
woberto Report This Comment
Date: May 02, 2012 07:26AM

A former Commonwealth Bank business analyst ordered to pay almost $6 million in legal fees after losing a sexual harassment suit against her former employer has only a mobile phone and a computer to her name, a court has heard.

Vivienne Louise Dye sued the bank and its online broking arm, CommSec, for sexual harassment, bullying and discrimination in the Federal Court, claiming that two senior employees sexually harassed her.

In a scathing judgment in March, Justice Robert Buchanan found against Ms Dye, describing her as a fantasist and liar who had a "venomous desire for revenge".
Advertisement: Story continues below

She was ordered to pay the bank's $5.85 million legal costs on an indemnity basis, meaning the bank can recover all its costs, rather than the two-thirds usually awarded.

Ms Dye has launched an appeal based in part on Justice Buchanan's conduct during the 94-day trial.

CBA has asked the Federal Court in Sydney to issue a security for costs order before the appeal begins, arguing Ms Dye is unlikely to be able to pay the bank's legal fees if she loses.

In a directions hearing this morning, Ms Dye's barrister, Peter King, said his client's only assets were a mobile phone and personal computer.

Mr King admitted that Ms Dye would "probably" be unable to pay the bank's legal fees if the appeal was dismissed.

"How is there any doubt about it?" Justice Arthur Emmett said.
"They couldn't be worth more than $2000 at the most".

Mr King replied: "Lots of things could happen between now and then."

Justice Emmett said Ms Dye "could win the lottery" but what mattered was her current financial situation.

Mr King said if the court granted the security for costs application it was unlikely Ms Dye could go ahead with the appeal.

The matter was stood over until June 13.

In the primary judgment, Justice Buchanan found the two men Ms Dye accused, Michael Blomfield and Angus Patterson, were "blameless" and the allegations were "completely fabricated".

In fact, it was Ms Dye who made advances towards Mr Blomfield, hoping for a "close and intimate relationship" with him, Justice Buchanan found.

When Mr Blomfield, then the executive general manager in charge of local business banking, rebuffed her, Ms Dye "turned from seeking his attention to a desire to be revenged on him".

Mr Patterson testified that, in 2007, Ms Dye told him she was taking out a sexual harassment case against Mr Blomfield, saying: : ''I'm going to get that c---, and I'm going to f---ing destroy him and his family.''

When Mr Patterson, who was her friend and confidant, declined to assist her against Mr Blomfield, Ms Dye turned on him, claiming Mr Patterson violently sexually assaulted her.
Justice Buchanan said the "sad and distressing saga" had involved 94 days of oral hearings, 600 documentary exhibits and nearly 8000 pages of transcript, and, despite his judgment vindicating the men, the "stain" on their reputation would be impossible to remove.

"The allegations against them were false. They should not have been made. They should not have been pursued," he said.

Both Mr Patterson and Mr Blomfield have since left Commonwealth Bank and Justice Buchanan congratulated the bank for fighting to clear their names, rather than taking the cheaper option to settle the case.


Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2012 07:27AM by woberto.
Anon Sackman Report This Comment
Date: May 02, 2012 01:42PM

Great nipples and i would harass the fuck out of her too. But I wouldnt lend her a penny.
BlahX3 Report This Comment
Date: May 02, 2012 01:46PM

"A pretty face can hide an evil mind." She might smell bad too.
Anon Report This Comment
Date: May 02, 2012 04:53PM

I think your right Blah!!!, You know she could EARN that money she owes. But then again maybe not.
BlahX3 Report This Comment
Date: May 04, 2012 03:18PM

She could be another case of someone putting another shrimp IN the Barbie.