Anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 21, 2005 01:11AM
and DPRK...
gruff Report This Comment Date: November 21, 2005 03:18AM
VIETNAM - 1965-1973 - CARPETBOMBED, LOST
LAOS - 1960s-1970s - CARPETBOMBED, SECRET WAR, LOST
EL SALVADOR - 1970s-PRESENT - DEATH SQUADS
NICARAGUA - 1970s-PRESENT - DEATH SQUADS
GUATEMALA - 1970s-PRESENT - DEATH SQUADS
COLOMBIA - PRESENT - CHAOS CONTINUES
CHILE - 1970s - INSTALLED RIGHT-WING DICTATOR
SOMALIA - 1990s - LOST
VENEZUELA - LAST YEAR - FOMENTED COUP WHICH FELL TO POPULAR UPRISING
SERBIA - 1990s - BOMBED, STATUS UNCERTAIN
cesiuminjector Report This Comment Date: November 21, 2005 03:36AM
we lost veitnam because we were politically handcuffed
Ninepointfiver Report This Comment Date: November 21, 2005 06:29AM
gruff, congratulations, you are the first dipshit to post nonsense. Nothing,
and I mean, NOTHING, that you posted has any.......anything to do with american
policy. Real quick, hurry and name the political party that most of all of these
failures were under......it shouldn't be too hard!!!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 21, 2005 09:33AM
The rest of the world dont care which american political party did what. All
they remember is that the americans did it.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: November 21, 2005 07:49PM
Ninepointfiver@16746
You fudgepacking asswipe.
I have never agreed with gruff until now.
It's really easy to to think you have won every war when you don't count the
losses.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: November 21, 2005 07:56PM
Revolutionary War
The French, Hessians, Spanish, Indians, Pirate Naval Merchants came to the aid
of colonists.
without this aid the colonist's revolt would have been soundly thwarted.
Something modern day colonists should remember.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 21, 2005 11:09PM
Germany wasn't free until 1987.
Kuwait is still ruled by a monarchy and was never under Saddam's control.
gruff Report This Comment Date: November 22, 2005 02:52AM
"Nothing, and I mean, NOTHING, that you posted has any.......anything to
do with american policy"
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA you moron!
Ninepointfiver Report This Comment Date: November 22, 2005 12:20PM
Beast, there is a difference between a war and a campaign. Just which of those
that gruff mentioned was a war? And of course, you had to resort to the
name-calling. BTW, the correst answer was "Dems".
gruff Report This Comment Date: November 22, 2005 01:02PM
Ninepointfiver, you've introduced two categories - namely "war" and
"political parties" - in order to allow yourself to stop thinking
about bad US foreign policies and pretend that America only does good things
overseas. And I could care less but it was Democrats who, in your terms, won the
Second World War, while it was Republican administrations that fucked Central
America six ways from Sunday.
Damn it boy read some history.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 22, 2005 08:13PM
...and DPRK......
......north korea?
Ninepointfiver Report This Comment Date: November 23, 2005 03:40AM
We have been carrying the Central Americas for the past 30 years.....period.
They are so screwed up down there, we can't possibly fix it, only train them.
That's not war, that's called an "on-going mission". As far as WWII, I
didn't say that all Democratic leaders failed, just that most of our failures
were under Democratic leaders (i.e. Johnson, Carter, Clinton). Clinton sent us
into more redundent places than any other leader, EVER! We're talin' major
campaigns too, not a special mission here and there.
gruff Report This Comment Date: November 23, 2005 04:42AM
Jesus Christ on a biscuit. You really do not have the slightest idea what the
Americans did down in Central America, do you? Well please do your country a
favor and read the following paper on US dealings with Nicaragua, written for
the Marine Corps Command and Staff College by a major in the US Marine
Corps:
[
www.globalsecurity.org]
Here's an excerpt to whet your appetite:
"A century and a half relationship with Nicaragua has witnessed a U.S.
policy which has 'alternated erratically between the obsessive and the
negligent.' Obsessive policy has culminated in active Marine Corps intervention
to establish client-governments, without regard to the exploitation and
corruption these governments generated. Negligent policy has resulted in sending
U.S. Ambassadors who could not speak Spanish and who insulated themselves from
fundamental cultural and sociological ills as well as the unique and dynamic
impact of Latin America military institutions upon society. [...] Although
staunchly pro-U.S., the [Somoza] dictatorship systematically developed the
machinery for graft and corruption which would eventually led to chaos and
revolution in Nicaragua."
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 25, 2005 05:03AM
Got to luv xspurts X = unknown quanity Spurts = a drip under pressure.
John_Stone Report This Comment Date: December 30, 2005 07:45AM
Ninepointfiver@16746 said : That's not war, that's called an "on-going
mission".
Sure, against "soft targets". I believe that's called
"terrorism" today in other parts of the world.
Too bad so many central american military types who carried out assassinations,
death squads and disappearances were trained at Ft. Benning, GA, the station
formerly known as The School of The Americas.